Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use ungridded dimensions for stokes drift exchange #1527

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Jan 4, 2023

Conversation

DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen commented Dec 8, 2022

PR Checklist

  • This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.

  • This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR

  • An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
    are specified below.

  • Results for one or more of the regression tests change and the reasons for the changes are understood and explained below.

  • New or updated input data is required by this PR. If checked, please work with the code managers to update input data sets on all platforms.

Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.

The information provided below allows the code managers to understand the changes relevant to this PR, whether those changes are in the ufs-weather-model repository or in a subcomponent repository. Ufs-weather-model code managers will use the information provided to add any applicable labels, assign reviewers and place it in the Commit Queue. Once the PR is in the Commit Queue, it is the PR owner's responsibility to keep the PR up-to-date with the develop branch of ufs-weather-model.

Description

Enables the use of ungridded dimensions for the exchange of partitioned stokes drift between MOM6 and WW3.

Issue(s) addressed

Testing

All baselines were run on Cheyenne.intel and Cheyenne.gnu. Since this PR changes the field names within the mediator restart files, the restart file was removed from the file comparison list for all wave-enabled tests. All tests were B4B at 9805fea. New baselines will be required solely because of the field name changes in the mediator restart files.

How were these changes tested? What compilers / HPCs was it tested with? Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?) Have regression tests and unit tests (utests) been run? On which platforms and with which compilers? (Note that unit tests can only be run on tier-1 platforms)

  • hera.intel
  • hera.gnu
  • orion.intel
  • cheyenne.intel
  • cheyenne.gnu
  • gaea.intel
  • jet.intel
  • wcoss2.intel
  • acorn.intel
  • opnReqTest for newly added/changed feature
  • CI

Dependencies


DeniseWorthen and others added 6 commits December 6, 2022 15:27
* removing cmeps restart file from comparison passes
cpld control/restart pair to pass
* cmeps art will appear as different because field names
changes
* all baselines pass if cmeps restart file is removed from
comparison list
@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen added Baseline Updates Current baselines will be updated. labels Dec 8, 2022
@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen If not necessary to wait for another wave pr, we can start working on this pr.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jkbk2004 There is a comment on NOAA-EMC/WW3#863 from @MatthewMasarik-NOAA that this PR won't be merged until after Jan 3.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the note. We will move to #1529.

@MatthewMasarik-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen I don't plan to merge develop into dev/ufs-weather-model while Jessica is away. I have tested this PR on my end though running the RT suite, and all runs ran fine, with some failing in run_check, though you've noted a baseline change. If you're able to proceed with this PR please go ahead.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@MatthewMasarik-NOAA The baselines will change only because the name of the fields stored in mediator restart files will change.

But I'm confused by saying "If you're able to proceed with this PR please go ahead." We need need to be able to merge the component level PRs in order to commit to UWM. So we won't be able to work on the UWM PR until we're sure that WW3 will also be able to be merged.

@MatthewMasarik-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen sure we should probably wait then.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@DeniseWorthen please bring these up to date with respective authoritative repositories

  • ufs-weather-model NOT up to date

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@DeniseWorthen please bring these up to date with respective authoritative repositories

  • ufs-weather-model NOT up to date

@BrianCurtis-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Automated RT Failure Notification
Machine: orion
Compiler: intel
Job: BL
[BL] Repo location: /work/noaa/nems/emc.nemspara/autort/pr/1154306112/20230103150020/ufs-weather-model
[BL] Error: Test compile_001 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_002 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_003 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_004 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_005 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_006 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_007 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_020 failed in run_compile failed
[BL] Error: Test compile_021 failed in run_compile failed
Please make changes and add the following label back: orion-intel-BL

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There appears to have been an issue checking out MOM6....it is empty.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

jkbk2004 commented Jan 3, 2023

There appears to have been an issue checking out MOM6....it is empty.

It could be git/orion issue. Let me see if it runs on my account.

@BrianCurtis-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Automated RT Failure Notification
Machine: gaea
Compiler: intel
Job: BL
[BL] Repo location: /lustre/f2/pdata/ncep/emc.nemspara/autort/pr/1154306112/20230103210011/ufs-weather-model
[BL] Error: Test regional_atmaq 115 failed in run_test failed
Please make changes and add the following label back: gaea-intel-BL

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

jkbk2004 commented Jan 4, 2023

@DeniseWorthen two cases fail on cheyenne.intel: cpld_restart_c192_p8 and hafs_global_multiple_4nests_atm. Path is /glade/scratch/jongkim/rt-1527-intel/jongkim/FV3_RT/rt_43747.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

jkbk2004 commented Jan 4, 2023

develop branch has no problem for those cases. MPT ERROR: process_vm_readv() had error: 3

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The HAFS case does is standalone and this PR has no impact. I ran both intel and gnu for this pr for testing, so either it is a glitch, or something in the meantime has changed.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have obtained the same two failures independently. I will need time to debug. The restart c192 case is core-dumping on the FV3/CMEPS PEs. The hafs case for me failed w/ the usual "MPT: shepherd terminated" error.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The c192 tests do not currently use the same TPN=18 setting that the c96 uses (we don't run the bmark on cheyenne). I can get the c192 test to run w/ TPN=18.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

jkbk2004 commented Jan 4, 2023

The c192 tests do not currently use the same TPN=18 setting that the c96 uses (we don't run the bmark on cheyenne). I can get the c192 test to run w/ TPN=18.

Yeas, both cpld_restart_c192_p8 and hafs_global_multiple_4nests_atm work on cheyenne now with TPN=18.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@BrianCurtis-NOAA Can you please review?

@BrianCurtis-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@BrianCurtis-NOAA Can you please review?

Yes. One moment.

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 merged commit 2b99f09 into ufs-community:develop Jan 4, 2023
@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen deleted the feature/pstokes branch February 7, 2023 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Baseline Updates Current baselines will be updated.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use ungridded dimensions for partitioned stokes drift exchange between wav<->ocn
4 participants