-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update MOM6 templates for coordination with global-workflow updates #1979
Update MOM6 templates for coordination with global-workflow updates #1979
Conversation
and update 5 deg template to be in line with g-w and OM4 settings
Here's the new log file from hera, comparing against a newly created baseline: |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Can we delay this pr one or two days more? RRFS operation application requires to merge #2021 ASAP. This week's schedule is not that busy. So, I think we can commit this pr tomorrow or 12/06 right after Dusan's PR. |
Please prioritize the work needed for RRFS and thank you for communicating the reasons for the delay. |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA can you sync up branch? we can working on this pr. |
@jkbk2004 this branch has been sync'd. |
Jenkins-ci ORTs passed |
Testing is complete, let's move to review. |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA looks like there is one outdated conversation. Can you resolve it for us, please? |
I don't understand the hercules log. Why is control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel showing up as test 235? It should be around test #30. It also shows up as a different rt_ directory. Is this a appended log? If so, the original log showing test failures should not be removed. If a second log is appended, it should clearly indicate that it is from a re-run. Test 235 control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel PASS The test seems to have failed at the initial run, but does not show as a "failure" ufs-weather-model/tests/logs/RegressionTests_hercules.log Lines 1976 to 1983 in aa7dea8
The RT seems to simply skip the reporting line? There should be a line like "Test 034 control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel FAIL" |
done |
Yes, it's the nccmp failure on Hercules. I have to run that case a second time to get it to pass. I did clean up the combined logs afterwards, so going forward I won't. |
@zach1221 OK, thanks. I'm also concerned though that there is an actual problem w/ the RT failure detection. I assume you didn't remove the line that reported the original test 034 failed "Test 034 control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel FAIL"? |
No I didn't remove the actual failed 034 control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel results piece, that should still in there. |
@junwang-noaa It seems we do have an issue w/ failure detection. It seems that when we get the "ALT CHECK ERROR" failure, the job is not always correctly reported. |
61404c0
Ok re-pushed the original logs without any edits. |
@zach1221 Thanks for posting the original logs. I see that at the end, the test 034 is noted as failed, but at the point where the files are being compared, it doesn't catch the fact that the comparison gives an error. It seems like after this line Comparing atmf024.nc ............ALT CHECK......ERROR We should get a report, something like Test 034 control_wrtGauss_netcdf_parallel_intel FAIL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve as new Hercules log has enough information for the failed case.
Ok, yah that's not happening it looks like. I can create a issue for it. |
@@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ export CHLCLIM='' | |||
export FRUNOFF='' | |||
export MOM6_RIVER_RUNOFF=False | |||
export MOM6_RESTART_SETTING=r | |||
export MOM6_DIAG_COORD_DEF_Z_FILE=oceanda_zgrid_25L.nc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Does this MOM6_DIAG_COORD_DEF_Z_FILE need to be added to the cpld_warmstart_c48 and cpld_restart_c48? Those tests are currently commented out (I need to recreate the warmstart files that they use). Will we need this variable set for those two tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DeniseWorthen good catch, yes you will want to set that for the other C48 tests.
PR Author Checklist:
RegressionTests_hera.log
Description
Updates to MOM6 templates for coordination with recent changes in global-workflow for NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#1944 and for the 5 deg template file to include wave-coupling variables, update the EPBL_LANGMUIR_SCHEME value and update the output to match workflow.
Linked Issues and Pull Requests
Associated UFSWM Issue to close
Subcomponent Pull Requests
None
Blocking Dependencies
None
Subcomponents involved:
Anticipated Changes
Input data
The file on hera /scratch1/NCEPDEV/global/glopara/fix/mom6/20220805/500/oceanda_zgrid_25L.nc needs to be added to @[INPUTDATA_ROOT]/MOM6_FIX/500/
Regression Tests:
Due to the change in output and the change of EPBL_LANGMUIR_SCHEME in the 5deg MOM input, the cpld_control_c48_intel will change answers.
Libraries
Code Managers Log
Testing Log: