Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi-class NMS #2162

Closed
PareshKamble opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed

Multi-class NMS #2162

PareshKamble opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 11 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon

Comments

@PareshKamble
Copy link

🚀 Feature

Can we have multi-class NMS so that we can assign only one class per object?

Motivation

While detecting more than one classes, most of the times, one object is detected as class A as well as class B with same or almost similar bounding box values. Ideally, one object should be labelled as only one class. Due to similar inter-class features, such multiple labelling occur.

@PareshKamble PareshKamble added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 8, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2021

👋 Hello @PareshKamble, thank you for your interest in 🚀 YOLOv5! Please visit our ⭐️ Tutorials to get started, where you can find quickstart guides for simple tasks like Custom Data Training all the way to advanced concepts like Hyperparameter Evolution.

If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide screenshots and minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, otherwise we can not help you.

If this is a custom training ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset images, training logs, screenshots, and a public link to online W&B logging if available.

For business inquiries or professional support requests please visit https://www.ultralytics.com or email Glenn Jocher at glenn.jocher@ultralytics.com.

Requirements

Python 3.8 or later with all requirements.txt dependencies installed, including torch>=1.7. To install run:

$ pip install -r requirements.txt

Environments

YOLOv5 may be run in any of the following up-to-date verified environments (with all dependencies including CUDA/CUDNN, Python and PyTorch preinstalled):

Status

CI CPU testing

If this badge is green, all YOLOv5 GitHub Actions Continuous Integration (CI) tests are currently passing. CI tests verify correct operation of YOLOv5 training (train.py), testing (test.py), inference (detect.py) and export (export.py) on MacOS, Windows, and Ubuntu every 24 hours and on every commit.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@PareshKamble you are referring to single-label NMS, not single-class NMS. Multi-label NMS is enabled by default as it increases mAP. You can disable it by setting this line to False:

multi_label = nc > 1 # multiple labels per box (adds 0.5ms/img)

You can enable agnostic NMS here, to apply NMS across all classes rather than per class:

def non_max_suppression(prediction, conf_thres=0.25, iou_thres=0.45, classes=None, agnostic=False, labels=()):

@PareshKamble
Copy link
Author

Thank you @glenn-jocher
I shall try that out right away.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

BTW agnostic NMS can be used like this:
python detect.py --agnostic

parser.add_argument('--agnostic-nms', action='store_true', help='class-agnostic NMS')

@iceisfun
Copy link

@glenn-jocher We have been having issues with non_max_suppression multi class trying to constrain nms to a group of classes. It seems like there is a bug in the non_max_suppression and we have been trying to hunt it down with only partial success.

I've been trying to get a full test case that exposes the issue

One useful thing here is using pickle to serialize the full pre nms data to help run minimal test cases. We just have not come up with enough concrete data for a issue report.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@iceisfun yes if you can spot a reproducible issue please let us know. There are two main settings in NMS, agnostic (default False) and multi-label (default True). Agnostic runs NMS on all boxes togethor rather than per class, multi-class can assign multiple classes of detection per box. You can modify these two settings below.

@PareshKamble you are referring to single-label NMS, not single-class NMS. Multi-label NMS is enabled by default as it increases mAP. You can disable it by setting this line to False:

multi_label = nc > 1 # multiple labels per box (adds 0.5ms/img)

You can enable agnostic NMS here, to apply NMS across all classes rather than per class:

def non_max_suppression(prediction, conf_thres=0.25, iou_thres=0.45, classes=None, agnostic=False, labels=()):

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon label Mar 17, 2021
@alucor-it
Copy link

alucor-it commented Oct 26, 2021

@iceisfun yes if you can spot a reproducible issue please let us know. There are two main settings in NMS, agnostic (default False) and multi-label (default True). Agnostic runs NMS on all boxes togethor rather than per class, multi-class can assign multiple classes of detection per box. You can modify these two settings below.

@PareshKamble you are referring to single-label NMS, not single-class NMS. Multi-label NMS is enabled by default as it increases mAP. You can disable it by setting this line to False:

multi_label = nc > 1 # multiple labels per box (adds 0.5ms/img)

You can enable agnostic NMS here, to apply NMS across all classes rather than per class:

def non_max_suppression(prediction, conf_thres=0.25, iou_thres=0.45, classes=None, agnostic=False, labels=()):

Hi,
Should I change "multi_label &= nc > 1" to multi_label &= False ?

Thanks

@abhiagwl4262
Copy link

@glenn-jocher We have been having issues with non_max_suppression multi class trying to constrain nms to a group of classes. It seems like there is a bug in the non_max_suppression and we have been trying to hunt it down with only partial success.

I've been trying to get a full test case that exposes the issue

One useful thing here is using pickle to serialize the full pre nms data to help run minimal test cases. We just have not come up with enough concrete data for a issue report.

I am also facing the issues with nms -
[OP_ERROR] <class 'RuntimeError'> : Trying to create tensor with negative dimension -1905798436: [-1905798436]
when I call torchvision.ops.nms

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

glenn-jocher commented Nov 25, 2021

@abhiagwl4262 👋 hi, thanks for letting us know about this possible problem with YOLOv5 🚀. We've created a few short guidelines below to help users provide what we need in order to get started investigating a possible problem.

How to create a Minimal, Reproducible Example

When asking a question, people will be better able to provide help if you provide code that they can easily understand and use to reproduce the problem. This is referred to by community members as creating a minimum reproducible example. Your code that reproduces the problem should be:

  • Minimal – Use as little code as possible to produce the problem
  • Complete – Provide all parts someone else needs to reproduce the problem
  • Reproducible – Test the code you're about to provide to make sure it reproduces the problem

For Ultralytics to provide assistance your code should also be:

  • Current – Verify that your code is up-to-date with GitHub master, and if necessary git pull or git clone a new copy to ensure your problem has not already been solved in master.
  • Unmodified – Your problem must be reproducible using official YOLOv5 code without changes. Ultralytics does not provide support for custom code ⚠️.

If you believe your problem meets all the above criteria, please close this issue and raise a new one using the 🐛 Bug Report template with a minimum reproducible example to help us better understand and diagnose your problem.

Thank you! 😃

@DoSquared
Copy link

@iceisfun yes if you can spot a reproducible issue please let us know. There are two main settings in NMS, agnostic (default False) and multi-label (default True). Agnostic runs NMS on all boxes togethor rather than per class, multi-class can assign multiple classes of detection per box. You can modify these two settings below.

@PareshKamble you are referring to single-label NMS, not single-class NMS. Multi-label NMS is enabled by default as it increases mAP. You can disable it by setting this line to False:

multi_label = nc > 1 # multiple labels per box (adds 0.5ms/img)

You can enable agnostic NMS here, to apply NMS across all classes rather than per class:

def non_max_suppression(prediction, conf_thres=0.25, iou_thres=0.45, classes=None, agnostic=False, labels=()):

Where can i disable the multi label please? in which script?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants