Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Renaming of policy #17594

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

Renaming of policy #17594

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

elit0451
Copy link
Member

Details

Test

  • The renaming shouldn't affect the functionality reported in the original issue.

Zeegaan and others added 4 commits November 18, 2024 13:50
@Zeegaan
Add access to datatypes if you have access to member section
98f1506
@elit0451
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/v15/dev' into v15/b…
3a29f9c 
…ugfix/expand-access-to-datatype
@elit0451
Rename policy
1337f46
@elit0451
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/v15/dev' into v15/b…
fd08309 
…ugfix/expand-access-to-datatype

# Conflicts:
#	src/Umbraco.Cms.Api.Management/Controllers/DataType/DataTypeControllerBase.cs
#	src/Umbraco.Cms.Api.Management/DependencyInjection/BackOfficeAuthPolicyBuilderExtensions.cs
#	src/Umbraco.Web.Common/Authorization/AuthorizationPolicies.cs
andr317c
andr317c approved these changes Nov 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@andr317c andr317c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@elit0451 elit0451 merged commit c363b78 into v15/dev Nov 20, 2024
18 checks passed
@elit0451 elit0451 deleted the v15/bugfix/expand-access-to-datatype branch November 20, 2024 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@andr317c andr317c andr317c approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@elit0451 @andr317c @Zeegaan