Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ordering models #4592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

ordering models #4592

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

domdinicola
Copy link
Collaborator

@domdinicola domdinicola commented Jan 26, 2025

improve code readability and admin fields order

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.31%. Comparing base (e4f483c) to head (180f68b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4592      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    85.31%   85.31%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          535      535              
  Lines        36836    36837       +1     
===========================================
- Hits         31427    31426       -1     
- Misses        5409     5411       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 60.59% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unittests 83.60% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@domdinicola domdinicola force-pushed the ordering-models branch 5 times, most recently from d24a609 to f6c0cef Compare January 27, 2025 01:34
@domdinicola domdinicola merged commit 445dd41 into develop Jan 27, 2025
13 checks passed
@domdinicola domdinicola deleted the ordering-models branch January 27, 2025 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants