Consider using DataProvider<ErasedDataStruct> instead of ErasedDataProvider #434
Labels
A-design
Area: Architecture or design
C-data-infra
Component: provider, datagen, fallback, adapters
R-obsolete
Resolution: This issue is no longer relevant
S-small
Size: One afternoon (small bug fix or enhancement)
T-core
Type: Required functionality
I realized through the course of working on #422 and #431 that it may be possible to take what I currently have proposed as
ErasedDataProvider
and instead make it simply a generic DataProvider with the type parameter set to ErasedDataStruct:DataProvider<ErasedDataStruct>
.Putting on the backlog for now, because I want to move on to other tasks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: