Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define resolved value formally #678

Closed
aphillips opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #728
Closed

Define resolved value formally #678

aphillips opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #728
Labels
blocker-candidate The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate normative Seek-Feedback-in-Preview Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

There have been multiple comments on the need to define the term "resolved value", which we use formally but have defined somewhat informally.
@aphillips aphillips added normative Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference formatting labels Feb 22, 2024
@catamorphism
Copy link
Collaborator

Note that this is the goal of #645

@aphillips aphillips added LDML46 LDML46 Release (Tech Preview - October 2024) and removed Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference labels Feb 28, 2024
@gibson042 gibson042 mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2024
Merged
@aphillips aphillips added the Seek-Feedback-in-Preview Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period label Mar 1, 2024
@eemeli eemeli mentioned this issue Mar 14, 2024
Merged
@mihnita mihnita added the blocker-candidate The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview label Aug 28, 2024
@aphillips aphillips added LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate and removed LDML46 LDML46 Release (Tech Preview - October 2024) labels Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
blocker-candidate The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate normative Seek-Feedback-in-Preview Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add Resolved Values and Function Handler sections to formatting unicode-org/message-format-wg
3 participants
@aphillips @catamorphism @mihnita