Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create decision-process.md #75

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 24, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions guidelines/decision-process.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# Decision making process


## Definitions
1. *Consensus* is defined as lack of sustained opposition.
2. *Good standing* is a characteristic of group members who fullfill their implicit and explicit obligations and hence are allowed to excercise all of their rights within the group without restriction.
3. *Blacklist* (*blacklisted*, *blacklisting*) is a taxative enumeration of group members who are temporarily excluded from exercising their rights within the group.
4. *Normative keywords* as defined in [BCP 14](https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp14)

## Rules
1. Any current group member is deemed to be in good standing unless blacklisted.
2. Any group member in good standing MAY make a proposal to the group via
- raising an issue,
- PR (against the repo or wiki), or
- orally in a monthly group meeting.
3. Approval or rejection of proposed solutions and decisions SHOULD be driven by consensus.
4. Consensus MAY be reached as part of the PR or issue resolution process.
5. The monthly group meeting has the ultimate decision making authority.
- Chair Group or Chair don't have a decision making authority, see [chair-group.md](chair-group.md) and [chair-group-members.md](chair-group-members.md).
6. In case consensus cannot be found over multiple iterations of arguments and counter arguments, a monthly group meeting MAY reach consensus to mandate the Chair Group to organize a ballot among all group members in good standing. The ballot wording, options, and success criteria SHOULD be explicitely defined in a monthly meeting. The Chair Group only administers and implements the ballot and its results.
7. Blacklisting procedure is TBD by monthly meeting consensus if and when needed.