-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Allow surrogates in content, issue #895 #906
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 5 commits
461555f
617e39d
41ed959
6fc5d68
4a26e5d
d7de9de
16b90b3
07d6fe5
17f2bbc
b7877a4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ The syntax specification takes into account the following design restrictions: | |||||||||
| control characters such as U+0000 NULL and U+0009 TAB, permanently reserved noncharacters | ||||||||||
| (U+FDD0 through U+FDEF and U+<i>n</i>FFFE and U+<i>n</i>FFFF where <i>n</i> is 0x0 through 0x10), | ||||||||||
| private-use code points (U+E000 through U+F8FF, U+F0000 through U+FFFFD, and | ||||||||||
| U+100000 through U+10FFFD), unassigned code points, and other potentially confusing content. | ||||||||||
| U+100000 through U+10FFFD), unassigned code points, unpaired surrogates in messages and | ||||||||||
| quoted literals only (U+D800 through U+DFFF), and other potentially confusing content. | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| U+100000 through U+10FFFD), unassigned code points, unpaired surrogates in messages and | |
| quoted literals only (U+D800 through U+DFFF), and other potentially confusing content. | |
| U+100000 through U+10FFFD), unassigned code points, | |
| unpaired surrogates (U+D800 through U+DFFF), and other potentially confusing content. |
aphillips marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This note would be better placed a bit further down in this section, and it needs to be separated from the surrounding content by an empty line. This would also be a more appropriate place for the concerns that are currently hidden away in the Security Considerations appendix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How/why is this important to note as a security consideration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I previously suggested the same thing:
I think that location is a good one because we put a whole wodge of notes there that are "read once and forget" about the content of messages.