Update Unicode to version 16.0.0, bump to 0.1.24

[Marcondiro]

Yet another tables update to Unicode 16.0.0
Thanks!

[Manishearth]

It's possible there are algorithm changes as well in 16.0

[Marcondiro]

There is some issue in the nfc computation for two new characters: U+105C9 and U+105E4

[Marcondiro]

Likely a bug here

unicode-normalization/scripts/unicode.py

Lines 379 to 396 in 79687ca

	def gen_composition_table(canon_comp, out):
	table = {}
	for (c1, c2), c3 in canon_comp.items():
	if c1 < 0x10000 and c2 < 0x10000:
	table[(c1 << 16) | c2] = c3
	(salt, keys) = minimal_perfect_hash(table)
	gen_mph_data('COMPOSITION_TABLE', table, '(u32, char)',
	lambda k: f"(0x{k:08X}, '\\u{{{table[k]:06X}}}')", 1)
	out.write("pub(crate) fn composition_table_astral(c1: char, c2: char) -> Option<char> {\n")
	out.write(" match (c1, c2) {\n")
	for (c1, c2), c3 in sorted(canon_comp.items()):
	if c1 >= 0x10000 and c2 >= 0x10000:
	out.write(" ('\\u{%s}', '\\u{%s}') => Some('\\u{%s}'),\n" % (hexify(c1), hexify(c2), hexify(c3)))
	out.write(" _ => None,\n")
	out.write(" }\n")
	out.write("}\n")

My hypotheses is that if (c1 < 0x10000 && c2 >= 0x10000) || (c1 > 0x10000 && c2 <= 0x10000) the entry is ignored