Review RFC for Probabilistic Error Amplification technique

[Misty-W]

RFC ready for review:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l-74EFdMA0CSFUpHjqCyQYb3ZKCmY77seB1_mOZo5Co/edit?tab=t.0

License

• I license this contribution under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 3 and grant Unitary Fund the right to provide additional permissions as described in section 7 of the GNU GPL, version 3.

Before opening the PR, please ensure you have completed the following where appropriate.

• I added unit tests for new code.
• I used type hints in function signatures.
• I used Google-style docstrings for functions.
• I updated the documentation where relevant.
• Added myself / the copyright holder to the AUTHORS file

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.73%. Comparing base (e813b14) to head (09dc6c6).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2550   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.73%   98.73%           
=======================================
  Files          92       92           
  Lines        4193     4193           
=======================================
  Hits         4140     4140           
  Misses         53       53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[natestemen]

Purva's comments have been resolved, and I've added mine. Looking good! Should be ready to merge this shortly.

@Misty-W can you add a row to the techniques table in the README to show PEA will be under development?

[purva-thakre]

Also add the RFC here: https://mitiq.readthedocs.io/en/stable/contributing.html#list-of-accepted-rfcs

[Misty-W]

@natestemen @purva-thakre this is ready to go in today's release if you agree!

[purva-thakre]

Thanks Misty!