Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update 8_use_unkey_blog.md #2500

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

utkarshml
Copy link

@utkarshml utkarshml commented Oct 19, 2024

What does this PR do?

Fixes # (issue)

If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Here is the Link:
(https://readwithutkarsh.hashnode.dev/rate-limiting-on-product-search-in-e-commerce-with-unkey)

Unkey

  • New Features
    • Added a new blog post about using Unkey in applications, authored by Utkarsh Jaiswal, dated 19-October-2024.
    • Included links to the blog and associated GitHub repository for further reading.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new blog post by Utkarsh Jaiswal, dated 21-October-2024, enhancing the content available to users.
    • Included a link to the new blog post for easy access.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 24bbc6b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 8:34pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve the addition of a new blog entry to the existing list in the file oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md. The new entry, authored by Utkarsh Jaiswal and dated 21-October-2024, includes a link to the associated blog. The structure of the document remains unchanged, maintaining consistency with the existing entries.

Changes

File Change Summary
oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md Added a new blog entry by Utkarsh Jaiswal (21-October-2024) with a link to the blog.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Needs Approval, 🕹️ oss.gg, :joystick: 1500 points

Suggested reviewers

  • mcstepp
  • chronark
  • perkinsjr
  • MichaelUnkey

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e834c0f and 24bbc6b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 19, 2024

@utkarshml is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1)

25-26: LGTM! Minor formatting suggestion.

The new entry adheres to the required format and provides all necessary information. It's correctly placed in chronological order. Great job!

A minor suggestion to improve consistency:

Consider adjusting the spacing in "App Link :" to match the format of "Blog Link:". Here's the suggested change:

-» 19-October-2024 by [Utkarsh Jaiswal](https://oss.gg/utkarshml) Blog Link: [Blog](https://readwithutkarsh.hashnode.dev/protecting-your-api-with-unkey-a-guide-to-api-security-and-rate-limiting) App Link : [Github Repo](https://github.com/utkarshml/unkey_application)
+» 19-October-2024 by [Utkarsh Jaiswal](https://oss.gg/utkarshml) Blog Link: [Blog](https://readwithutkarsh.hashnode.dev/protecting-your-api-with-unkey-a-guide-to-api-security-and-rate-limiting) App Link: [Github Repo](https://github.com/utkarshml/unkey_application)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d774a4c and e834c0f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@utkarshml utkarshml changed the title Update 8_use_unkey_blog.md chore: Update 8_use_unkey_blog.md Oct 19, 2024
@chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @utkarshml, this issue is specifically for using Unkey in your product in production, which this post does not mention at all.

@chronark chronark self-assigned this Oct 20, 2024
Update my blog based on your feedback
@utkarshml
Copy link
Author

Hey @chronark , i update my blog based on your feedback

@chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

/award 1500

@chronark chronark closed this Oct 28, 2024
Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Awarding utkarshml: 1500 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/utkarshml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants