Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove multiselect until errors fixed #2530

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MichaelUnkey
Copy link
Collaborator

@MichaelUnkey MichaelUnkey commented Oct 22, 2024

What does this PR do?

Can get the permissions to show. No selection can be made and still shows some errors.
For now I removed the multi select, After role creation the next page allows you to select permissions anyway. For now it will at least stop errors.

Fixes # (issue)
eng-1418

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

Role can still be created.

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Commented out the broken functionality for selecting existing permissions in the role creation form.
  • Chores

    • Added comments to clarify the current state of the permissions selection feature.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: eca01f1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 4, 2024 1:29pm
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 4, 2024 1:29pm
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 4, 2024 1:29pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 4, 2024 1:29pm
workflows ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 4, 2024 1:29pm

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@MichaelUnkey MichaelUnkey marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 05:20
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the CreateNewRole component within create-new-role.tsx. The primary update involves commenting out the conditional rendering logic for selecting existing permissions, which indicates that this feature is currently non-functional. The overall structure of the form remains unchanged, including submission logic and error handling. Minor formatting adjustments were also made, including comments to denote the broken state of the permissions feature.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx Modified CreateNewRole component to comment out the permissions selection logic; minor formatting adjustments made.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: reset form fields in delete dialog on reopen #2546: This PR modifies the CreateNewRole component, adding a function to manage the dialog's open state and reset the form, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also involves modifications to the CreateNewRole component.

Suggested labels

Bug, 🕹️ oss.gg, :joystick: 150 points, hacktoberfest

Suggested reviewers

  • chronark
  • mcstepp

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx (1)

Incomplete Removal of permissionOptions References

Several references to permissionOptions still exist within create-new-role.tsx, which may lead to potential bugs or inconsistent behavior:

  • permissionOptions: z
  • permissionIds: values.permissionOptions?.map((o) => o.value),
  • name="permissionOptions"
  • return form.setValue("permissionOptions", cb(field.value ?? []));

Recommended Actions:

  • Complete Removal: Ensure all instances of permissionOptions are removed if the feature is no longer needed.
  • Proper Handling: If permissionOptions is intended to be temporarily disabled, implement proper error handling or feature flags to manage its state without leaving residual references.
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 145-175: Temporary fix applied, follow-up required

The temporary removal of the permissions selection aligns with the PR objectives to address issues with the multi-select functionality. However, this change has several implications:

  1. User Experience: Users can no longer select permissions during role creation, which may impact their workflow.
  2. Functionality: The ability to assign permissions to roles at creation time is now limited, potentially affecting the completeness of role definitions.
  3. Technical Debt: Commenting out code instead of proper error handling or feature flagging introduces technical debt.

To ensure this change meets the PR objectives and doesn't introduce new issues:

Would you like assistance in creating a follow-up task to properly implement the permissions selection feature?

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that roles can still be created and that there are no lingering references to the commented-out functionality

# Check for any remaining references to permissionOptions in the file
echo "Checking for remaining references to permissionOptions:"
rg 'permissionOptions' apps/dashboard/app/\(app\)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx

# Verify that the role creation mutation is still intact
echo "Verifying role creation mutation:"
rg 'createRole.mutate' apps/dashboard/app/\(app\)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx

# Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to this change
echo "Checking for TODO or FIXME comments:"
rg -i 'TODO|FIXME' apps/dashboard/app/\(app\)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx

Length of output: 796


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of 'permissionOptions' in the codebase to identify dependencies

echo "Searching for all references to 'permissionOptions' in the repository:"
rg 'permissionOptions'

Length of output: 663

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34831dc and 7332f9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/dashboard/app/(app)/authorization/roles/create-new-role.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

@chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

@MichaelUnkey please fix the lint issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants