fix: revert ratelimits #2535
fix: revert ratelimits #2535
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request implements significant changes across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 31
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-83: Approve preservation of core functionality with a minor suggestion.The core functionality, including input validation, database operations, and audit logging, has been maintained. This ensures that the procedure continues to function as intended.
For consistency, consider standardizing the error messages. For example:
- message: - "We were unable to update the name on this key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", + message: "Unable to update the key name. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",This change would make the error messages more concise and consistent throughout the file.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deleteRole.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-91: Consider refactoring for improved structure and error handling.While the current implementation works, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Extract the database queries into separate functions to improve readability and testability.
- Consolidate error handling to reduce repetition.
- Consider moving the audit logging outside the transaction for better performance and reliability.
Example refactoring:
const getWorkspaceWithRole = async (tenantId: string, roleId: string) => { // ... (implement the query here) }; const deleteRoleFromDb = async (tx: Transaction, roleId: string, workspaceId: string) => { // ... (implement the delete operation here) }; export const deleteRole = t.procedure .use(auth) .input(z.object({ roleId: z.string().uuid().max(36) })) .mutation(async ({ input, ctx }) => { try { const workspace = await getWorkspaceWithRole(ctx.tenant.id, input.roleId); if (!workspace) { throw new TRPCError({ code: "NOT_FOUND", message: "Workspace not found" }); } if (workspace.roles.length === 0) { throw new TRPCError({ code: "NOT_FOUND", message: "Role not found" }); } await db.transaction(async (tx) => { await deleteRoleFromDb(tx, input.roleId, workspace.id); }); // Audit logging moved outside the transaction await insertAuditLogs(db, { // ... (audit log details) }); return { success: true }; } catch (error) { // Centralized error handling if (error instanceof TRPCError) { throw error; } throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again or contact support.", }); } });This refactoring would improve code organization, reduce duplication, and potentially enhance performance.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectPermissionToRole.ts (1)
3-3: Remove unused import forrateLimitedProcedureandratelimit.The import for
rateLimitedProcedureandratelimitis no longer used in this file. To keep the codebase clean and prevent confusion, it's recommended to remove unused imports.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import { rateLimitedProcedure, ratelimit } from "@/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure";Also applies to: 6-6
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/createRootKey.ts (1)
152-162: LGTM: Improved transaction structure and error handling.The restructured transaction logic enhances readability and maintainability. The introduction of a separate variable for permissions and audit logs improves code organization and aligns with the overall improvements in error handling and logging.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
upsertPermissionsfunction for better code documentation.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateEnabled.ts (1)
Line range hint
34-37: Consider Logging Caught Errors InternallyIn the
.catchblocks, the caught errors_errare not utilized. Consider logging these errors internally to aid in debugging while still providing generic error messages to the user.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createPermission.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-12: Update error message to reflect allowed special charactersThe regex pattern permits the asterisk (
*) character, but the error message does not mention it. To avoid confusion, please update the error message to include all allowed special characters.Apply this diff to correct the error message:
message: - "Must be at least 3 characters long and only contain alphanumeric, colons, periods, dashes and underscores", + "Must be at least 3 characters long and only contain alphanumeric characters, colons, periods, dashes, underscores, and asterisks",apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectPermissionFromRole.ts (3)
Line range hint
16-27: Simplify Error Handling in Workspace RetrievalCatching errors during the workspace retrieval with
.catch()may suppress important error details and is unnecessary if you expect.findFirst()to throw only on critical failures. Consider removing the.catch()block to allow errors to propagate naturally, or use atry...catchblock if specific error handling is required.Apply this diff to simplify the error handling:
- const workspace = await db.query.workspaces - .findFirst({ - where: (table, { and, eq, isNull }) => - and(eq(table.tenantId, ctx.tenant.id), isNull(table.deletedAt)), - }) - .catch((_err) => { - throw new TRPCError({ - code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", - message: - "We are unable to remove permission from the role. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", - }); - }); + let workspace; + try { + workspace = await db.query.workspaces.findFirst({ + where: (table, { and, eq, isNull }) => + and(eq(table.tenantId, ctx.tenant.id), isNull(table.deletedAt)), + }); + } catch (err) { + throw new TRPCError({ + code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", + message: + "An unexpected error occurred while retrieving the workspace. Please try again or contact support.", + }); + }
Line range hint
28-34: Ensure Accurate Error MessagesThe error message for a missing workspace suggests contacting support but may not provide additional actionable information. Consider providing more context or guiding the user on how to resolve potential issues, such as verifying their access rights.
Line range hint
35-74: Enhance Transaction Error HandlingIn the transaction, the
.catch()method captures any errors but only logs them to the console before throwing a genericINTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR. This could obscure specific database errors that might aid in debugging. Consider logging detailed error information or handling specific error types to improve maintainability.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts (1)
Line range hint
41-52: Ensure Audit Log Description Accurately Reflects the ActionBased on previous feedback, the audit log description should clearly reflect the action performed without including less informative identifiers like
workspaceId. Consider revising the description to reference thekeyAuthIdand succinctly describe the change.Update the audit log description as follows:
description: `Changed ${keyAuth.workspaceId} default prefix from ${keyAuth.defaultPrefix} to ${input.defaultPrefix}`, + description: `Changed default prefix from ${keyAuth.defaultPrefix} to ${input.defaultPrefix} for KeyAuth ID ${keyAuth.id}`,apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateDeleteProtection.ts (4)
Line range hint
64-66: Fix the syntax error caused by an extra curly brace in the template literal.There is an extra closing curly brace
}at the end of the template literal for thedescriptionfield, which will result in a syntax error.Apply this diff to correct the syntax error:
- description: `API ${api.name} delete protection is now ${input.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled"}.}`, + description: `API ${api.name} delete protection is now ${input.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled"}.`,
Line range hint
31-31: Consider externalizing the support email address used in error messages.Hardcoding the support email
support@unkey.devdirectly in multiple error messages can make future updates cumbersome and might expose the email in logs unnecessarily. Consider externalizing this email address to a configuration file or an environment variable.Also applies to: 38-38, 54-54, 86-86
Line range hint
50-56: Simplify error handling within the transaction by relying on the outer catch block.Within the transaction, individual
.catchblocks are used after database operations. Since the entire transaction is wrapped in a.catchblock, these inner catches may be redundant and can be removed to streamline the code.Apply this diff to remove the inner
.catchblocks:await tx .update(schema.apis) .set({ deleteProtection: input.enabled, }) .where(eq(schema.apis.id, input.apiId)) - .catch((_err) => { - throw new TRPCError({ - code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", - message: - "We were unable to update the API. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev.", - }); - }); await insertAuditLogs(tx, { workspaceId: api.workspace.id, actor: { type: "user", id: ctx.user.id, }, event: "api.update",This allows any errors within the transaction to be caught by the outer
.catchblock starting at line 83.Also applies to: 83-88
Tenant ownership verification failed for API update.
The verification process indicates that the specified
API_IDdoes not belong to the providedTENANT_ID. Please ensure that the tenant ownership check is correctly implemented to prevent unauthorized updates.
- File:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateDeleteProtection.ts- Lines: 5-19
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
34-40: Verify tenant ownership before proceeding with the update.While the code checks if the
api.workspace.tenantIdmatchesctx.tenant.id, it's important to verify that this check is sufficient for ensuring the user has the necessary permissions to update the API. Ensure that there are no additional permission checks required.Run the following script to list all APIs accessible to the tenant and confirm that the API being updated is included:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the API belongs to the tenant. # Expectation: The API ID should be present in the list of APIs for the tenant. # Replace <TENANT_ID> with the actual tenant ID. TENANT_ID="<TENANT_ID>" ast-grep --pattern $'const ctx = {\n tenant: { id: "$TENANT_ID" },\n}' -A 10 | rg "id: \"${input.apiId}\""Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the API belongs to the tenant. # Replace <TENANT_ID> and <API_ID> with the actual tenant ID and API ID. TENANT_ID="<TENANT_ID>" API_ID="<API_ID>" # List all APIs for the tenant and check if the API_ID exists. ast-grep --pattern $'const ctx = {\n tenant: { id: "'${TENANT_ID}'" },\n}' -A 10 | rg "id: \"${API_ID}\""Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all APIs for the tenant and verify if the specified API_ID exists. # Replace <TENANT_ID> and <API_ID> with the actual tenant ID and API ID. TENANT_ID="<TENANT_ID>" API_ID="<API_ID>" # Step 1: List all APIs associated with the tenant. ast-grep --pattern $'const ctx = {\n tenant: { id: "'${TENANT_ID}'" },\n}' -A 20 | rg "apiId: \"" | awk -F'"' '{print $4}' # Step 2: Check if the specified API_ID exists in the listed APIs. echo "Verifying if API_ID ${API_ID} belongs to TENANT_ID ${TENANT_ID}:" ast-grep --pattern $'const ctx = {\n tenant: { id: "'${TENANT_ID}'" },\n}' -A 20 | rg "apiId: \"'${API_ID}'\"" && echo "API_ID ${API_ID} is valid for TENANT_ID ${TENANT_ID}" || echo "API_ID ${API_ID} not found for TENANT_ID ${TENANT_ID}"Length of output: 525
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createNamespace.ts (2)
75-76: Capitalize the first letter in error messageThe error message should start with a capital letter for consistency and professionalism.
Apply this diff to fix the capitalization:
- "duplicate namespace name. Please use a unique name for each namespace.", + "Duplicate namespace name. Please use a unique name for each namespace.",
Line range hint
84-87: Typographical error in error messageThere is a typo in the error message: "We are unable to create namspace." It should be "namespace."
Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- message: - "We are unable to create namspace. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", + message: + "We are unable to create namespace. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.ts (1)
80-81: Add Period for Consistency in Error MessageThe error message does not end with a period, unlike other error messages in the code. For consistency, consider adding a period at the end of the message.
Apply this diff to make the error message consistent:
message: - "Unable to create gateway, please contact support at support@unkey.dev" + "Unable to create gateway, please contact support at support@unkey.dev."apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateExpiration.ts (1)
Line range hint
17-27: Correct the error message for missing expiration dateThe error message when
input.expirationis not provided reads: "Expiration is not enabled. Please please enable expiration before setting an expiration date." This seems contradictory since the user is enabling expiration but hasn't provided a date. Updating the message will provide clearer guidance to the user.Apply this diff to correct the error message:
throw new TRPCError({ - message: - "Expiration is not enabled. Please please enable expiration before setting an expiration date.", + message: "Expiration date is missing. Please provide an expiration date.", code: "BAD_REQUEST", });apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/create.ts (1)
Line range hint
18-25: Redundant user authentication check after applying middlewareSince the
authmiddleware is applied using.use(auth), the user should already be authenticated, andctx.usershould be defined. The explicit check foruserIdmay be unnecessary. Consider removing this check to simplify the code, or ensure that the middleware handles unauthenticated access appropriately.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectRoleToKey.ts (1)
Line range hint
25-63: Refactor repetitive error handling to improve maintainabilityMultiple instances of
TRPCErrorare thrown with similar messages for error handling. Consider refactoring these into a helper function or constants to reduce code duplication and simplify future updates.Apply this refactor to extract common error handling:
+// Define a helper function for internal server errors +function throwInternalServerError(message: string) { + throw new TRPCError({ + code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", + message, + }); +} // Usage in the code const workspace = await db.query.workspaces .findFirst({...}) .catch((_err) => { - throw new TRPCError({ - code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", - message: "We are unable to connect the role to the key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", - }); + throwInternalServerError("We are unable to connect the role to the key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev"); }); // Repeat for other occurrencesapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (1)
63-63: Check for potential undefinedkey.permissionsBefore using
key.permissions.find(...), consider verifying thatkey.permissionsis defined and is an array to prevent potential runtime errors ifpermissionsis undefined or null.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/addPermissionToRootKey.ts (2)
Line range hint
29-29: Inconsistent terminology: "rootkey" vs. "root key" in error messagesThe error messages use both "rootkey" and "root key". For consistency and clarity, consider standardizing the terminology across all error messages to either "root key" or "rootkey".
Also applies to: 43-43
Line range hint
25-29: Add error logging for database operation failuresIn the catch blocks where database query errors are caught and rethrown as
TRPCError, consider logging the original errors internally. This will aid in diagnosing issues without exposing sensitive details to the client.Apply this change to log the errors:
.catch((_err) => { + console.error("Database query error:", _err); throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "We are unable to add permission to the root key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev.", }); });Also applies to: 76-80
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRatelimit.ts (1)
Line range hint
6-17: Ensure rate limit parameters are required when enabling rate limitingWhen
enabledistrue, the rate limit parametersratelimitAsync,ratelimitLimit, andratelimitDurationshould be required. Currently, they are marked as optional in the input schema, which may lead to runtime errors if they are missing or undefined. Consider updating the input schema to require these parameters when rate limiting is enabled.You can use Zod's conditional validation to enforce this requirement:
export const updateKeyRatelimit = t.procedure .use(auth) .input( z .object({ keyId: z.string(), workspaceId: z.string(), enabled: z.boolean(), - ratelimitAsync: z.boolean().optional(), - ratelimitLimit: z.number().int().positive().optional(), - ratelimitDuration: z.number().int().positive().optional(), + ratelimitAsync: z.boolean(), + ratelimitLimit: z.number().int().positive(), + ratelimitDuration: z.number().int().positive(), }) + .refine( + (data) => (!data.enabled) || (data.ratelimitAsync !== undefined && data.ratelimitLimit !== undefined && data.ratelimitDuration !== undefined), + { + message: "Rate limit parameters are required when rate limiting is enabled.", + path: ["ratelimitAsync", "ratelimitLimit", "ratelimitDuration"], + } + ) )apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changePlan.ts (3)
38-39: Consider Logging the Caught Error for Better DebuggingIn the catch block, the caught error
_erris not logged. Logging the error can provide valuable context for debugging when an internal server error occurs.Apply this diff to log the error:
.catch((_err) => { + console.error(_err); throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "We are unable to change plans. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", }); });
47-47: Fix Punctuation in Error MessageThe error message should use a period instead of a comma to separate sentences. Also, "Please" should not be capitalized after a comma.
Apply this diff to fix the punctuation:
- "Workspace not found, Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev." + "Workspace not found. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev."
166-167: Clarify Error Message for No Payment Methods FoundThe error message could be more specific to indicate that no valid payment methods are available, even though a Stripe customer ID exists. This provides clearer guidance to the user.
Apply this diff to improve the error message:
- "You do not have a payment method. Please add one before upgrading." + "No valid payment methods found. Please add a payment method before upgrading."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/delete.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultBytes.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateDeleteProtection.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateIpWhitelist.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/create.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/createRootKey.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/delete.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/deleteRootKey.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateEnabled.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateExpiration.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateMetadata.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateOwnerId.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRatelimit.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRemaining.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRootKeyName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/delete.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createNamespace.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createOverride.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteNamespace.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateNamespaceName.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateOverride.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/addPermissionToRootKey.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectPermissionToRole.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectRoleToKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createPermission.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createRole.ts (5 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deletePermission.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deleteRole.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectPermissionFromRole.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectRoleFromKey.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updatePermission.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updateRole.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changeName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changePlan.ts (5 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/create.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/optIntoBeta.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts (1)
Learnt from: chronark PR: unkeyed/unkey#2146 File: apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts:80-80 Timestamp: 2024-10-04T17:27:08.666Z Learning: Ensure that audit log descriptions accurately reflect the action being performed, such as updating the `defaultPrefix`, and avoid incorrect references like 'name' when not applicable.
🪛 Biome
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRootKeyName.ts
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (90)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts (2)
6-8: Approve changes and verify authentication middleware.The transition from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through authentication. This change is consistent with the modifications observed in other files.To ensure the authentication middleware is correctly implemented, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Authentication middleware correctly implemented across all procedures.
All procedures, including
updateKeyName.ts, consistently use the authentication middleware as intended. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent use of authentication middleware across all procedures. # Test: Search for all procedure definitions and their use of auth middleware rg -U --multiline-dotall 'export const \w+ = t\.procedure(\s|\n)*\.use\(auth\)'Length of output: 7445
7-8: Clarify strategy for preventing API abuse after removing rate limiting.While the removal of rate limiting aligns with the PR objective, it's important to consider the potential risks of unrestricted API access.
Could you please clarify:
- Is there an alternative mechanism in place to prevent API abuse?
- Are there plans to implement a different rate limiting strategy in the future?
To help assess the impact, let's check for any global rate limiting mechanisms:
✅ Verification successful
To gather more information about the specific changes related to rate limiting in the updateKeyName procedure, let's run some additional checks.
To confirm the current state of rate limiting in the updateName procedure and gather more context about recent changes, let's run some additional checks.
It appears that the removal of rate limiting from the updateKeyName procedure is intentional, while rate limiting is still widely used across the codebase. Let's address the reviewer's concern with this information.
Removal of rate limiting for updateKeyName is intentional, but rate limiting is still used extensively in the codebase.
The updateKeyName procedure no longer uses the rateLimitedProcedure, which is a deliberate change. However, rate limiting remains an important feature in the codebase:
- The ratelimitProcedure.ts file defines global rate limiting logic.
- Many other procedures still use rateLimitedProcedure and ratelimit.
- Recent commits show active management of rate limiting features.
This specific change for updateKeyName might be due to performance considerations or a reassessment of the need for rate limiting on this particular operation. If you have concerns about potential abuse, we can discuss implementing alternative safeguards or monitoring for this specific procedure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for global rate limiting implementations # Test 1: Check for rate limiting middleware or configurations rg -i 'rate.?limit|throttle' # Test 2: Look for common rate limiting libraries rg -i 'express-rate-limit|rate-limiter-flexible|bottleneck'Length of output: 311091
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for recent changes related to rate limiting in updateKeyName procedure git log -p -- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts | grep -i "ratelimit" # Look for configuration files or environment variables related to rate limiting grep -r "RATELIMIT" .env* config* apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/ # Search for comments explaining rate limiting changes grep -r "rate limit" apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.tsLength of output: 670
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the current state of updateName.ts cat apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts # Look for recent pull requests or issues related to rate limiting git log --grep="rate limit" --grep="ratelimit" --since="2 weeks ago" -- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/ # Check for global rate limiting configurations grep -r "ratelimit" apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/Length of output: 18768
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/delete.ts (6)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement added for authentication.The new import for
authandtis correctly added to support the transition fromrateLimitedProceduretot.procedurewith authentication middleware.
8-9: LGTM: Procedure updated with authentication middleware.The change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)successfully implements the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through authentication.
13-13: LGTM: Minor formatting improvement.The slight adjustment in formatting enhances code readability while maintaining the existing input validation logic.
55-57: LGTM: Improved formatting in database query.The formatting changes in the
inArraycondition enhance code readability while maintaining the original query logic.
82-83: LGTM: Standardized error message formatting.The error message has been reformatted for consistency, aligning with the overall effort to standardize error messages across the codebase. The error code and general content remain unchanged.
Line range hint
1-85: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement PR objectives.The modifications in this file effectively revert the rate limits by replacing
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedureand adding authentication middleware. These changes enhance security while maintaining the core functionality of thedeleteKeysprocedure. The error handling and formatting improvements contribute to better code consistency across the codebase.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultBytes.ts (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import changes align with new procedure structure.The addition of
tandauthimports is consistent with the changes in the procedure definition, supporting the removal of rate limiting.
19-19: LGTM: Minor changes improve consistency.The core logic remains intact, with only minor formatting changes and error message modifications. These changes enhance the overall consistency of the codebase.
To ensure consistent error messaging across the codebase, let's verify the error messages:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent error messaging across the codebase # Test: Search for TRPCError instances with INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR rg -A 5 'new TRPCError\(\{.*code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR"' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers # Test: Search for support email mentions in error messages rg -A 5 'contact support@unkey\.dev' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routersAlso applies to: 28-31, 48-51, 75-78
8-9: LGTM: Procedure definition updated to remove rate limiting and add authentication.The change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through authentication.To ensure consistent implementation across the codebase, let's verify the usage of
t.procedure.use(auth):✅ Verification successful
: Confirmation that
t.procedure.use(auth)is consistently used across the codebase, including its centralized usage intrpc.ts. No issues found with the changes insetDefaultBytes.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of t.procedure.use(auth) across the codebase # Test: Search for t.procedure.use(auth) usage rg -A 5 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routersLength of output: 87497
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of t.procedure.use(auth) across the entire codebase # Test: Search for 't.procedure.use(auth)' in all files rg 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' .Length of output: 125
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deleteRole.ts (1)
28-29: Approve error handling improvements.The error messages have been standardized for better consistency across different scenarios. This improves the overall quality and maintainability of the API responses.
Also applies to: 50-55
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRootKeyName.ts (7)
Line range hint
22-29: Improved error handling for workspace queryThe addition of this error handling block enhances the robustness of the procedure. It provides clear feedback to the user in case of a database query failure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
31-37: Improved error handling for non-existent workspaceThis error handling block enhances user experience by providing a clear message when the workspace is not found. It uses the appropriate error code and message.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
39-45: Improved error handling for key validationThis error handling block enhances security and user experience by providing a clear message when the key is not found or doesn't match the workspace. It uses the appropriate error code and message.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
53-60: Improved error handling for key update operationThe addition of this error handling block enhances the robustness of the key update operation. It provides clear feedback to the user in case of a database update failure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
61-77: LGTM: Audit log insertionThe audit log insertion is correctly implemented within the same transaction as the key update. This ensures consistency between the key update operation and the corresponding audit log.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
78-85: Improved error handling for the entire transactionThe addition of this error handling block enhances the overall robustness of the procedure. It provides a fallback error message in case of any unexpected errors during the transaction execution.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Line range hint
1-85: Overall assessment: Improved error handling and robustnessThe changes in this file significantly enhance the error handling capabilities of the
updateRootKeyNameprocedure. Each potential point of failure now has a specific error message, improving the overall user experience and making debugging easier. The core functionality remains intact, which is good.However, there's a minor issue with a redundant import statement that needs to be addressed. Once that's fixed, these changes will greatly improve the reliability and maintainability of this procedure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts (2)
18-19: LGTM! Improved query readability.The reformatting of the query construction enhances code readability without changing the underlying logic. The use of the
andfunction makes the query conditions more explicit, which is a good practice.
8-9: LGTM! Verify consistent implementation across the codebase.The transition from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)enhances security by enforcing authentication for thedeleteOverrideoperation. This change aligns with the PR objective and is consistent with modifications in other files.Let's verify if this change has been consistently applied across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) across the codebase # Test: Look for occurrences of t.procedure.use(auth) rg -n 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers # Test: Look for any remaining occurrences of rateLimitedProcedure rg -n 'rateLimitedProcedure' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routersapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateNamespaceName.ts (5)
7-7: LGTM: New import for authentication middleware.The new import statement for
authandtis correctly added and necessary for the updated procedure implementation.
12-17: LGTM: Minor formatting improvements.The formatting changes in the input validation schema improve readability without altering the functionality. The validation logic remains correct and unchanged.
27-30: LGTM: Improved query condition formatting.The query conditions have been reformatted for better readability without changing the underlying logic. This improves code maintainability.
49-51: LGTM: Simplified namespace retrieval.The namespace retrieval logic has been simplified using the
findmethod, which improves code readability without changing the functionality.
Line range hint
1-100: Summary: Successful implementation of authentication middleware and code improvements.The changes in this file successfully implement the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through the addition of authentication middleware. The core functionality of updating namespace names remains intact, with improvements in code readability and structure. Error handling and input validation continue to provide robust checks throughout the process.
Key improvements:
- Replaced
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure.use(auth)for enhanced security.- Improved code formatting and readability in several sections.
- Simplified namespace retrieval logic.
These changes contribute to a more maintainable and secure codebase.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/delete.ts (6)
11-12: Approve minor formatting change.The input validation logic remains intact, and the minor formatting change improves code readability.
33-34: Approve improved error message.The updated error message for API not found is more specific and user-friendly. It maintains consistency with error handling in other procedures, which is a good practice.
104-104: Approve minor formatting change.The audit log insertion logic remains intact, and the minor formatting change improves code readability.
111-112: Approve improved error message.The updated error message for internal server error is more specific and user-friendly. It maintains consistency with error handling in other procedures, which is a good practice.
Line range hint
1-115: Summary of changes and their impact.The changes in this file successfully implement the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through authentication middleware. The modifications also improve error handling and maintain consistency with other procedures. However, the removal of rate limiting requires careful consideration.
Please ensure that:
- The removal of rate limiting doesn't expose the API to potential abuse.
- Alternative protection mechanisms are in place or planned.
- The impact of these changes has been thoroughly tested across the system.
Consider running load tests to verify the system's behavior under high traffic conditions without rate limiting.
6-8: Approve changes with a suggestion to verify impact.The transition from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective and enhances security by incorporating authentication middleware. However, the removal of rate limiting could potentially expose the API to abuse.Please verify the impact of removing rate limiting. Consider implementing alternative protection mechanisms if necessary. Run the following script to check for any remaining rate limit implementations:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/create.ts (5)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The new import
{ auth, t } from "../../trpc"is correctly added to support the updated procedure definition, aligning with the PR objective of reverting rate limits.
Line range hint
11-37: LGTM: Input validation preserved.The input validation schema is correctly maintained within the new procedure definition. This ensures that all necessary data integrity checks remain in place, which is crucial for the security and reliability of the key creation process.
Line range hint
38-138: LGTM: Core functionality and error handling preserved.The core functionality of the
createKeyprocedure, including database queries, transactions, and audit logging, remains intact. Error handling and messages are consistent with the previous implementation, ensuring proper user feedback. The preservation of transaction logic for key insertion and audit logging maintains the integrity of atomic operations.
Line range hint
1-138: Summary: Successfully implemented rate limit reversion with enhanced security.The changes in this file effectively revert the rate limits as per the PR objective. The key improvements are:
- Replaced
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure.use(auth), enhancing security through authentication.- Preserved input validation, core functionality, and error handling, ensuring the reliability of the key creation process.
- Maintained transaction logic and audit logging for data integrity.
These changes align well with the PR's goal while also improving the overall security of the API.
9-10: LGTM: Procedure definition updated correctly.The change from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create)tot.procedure.use(auth)correctly removes rate limiting and adds authentication middleware, aligning with the PR objective. This enhances security by requiring authentication for the operation.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All procedures use authentication middleware correctly.
All procedure definitions across the
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routersdirectory consistently use.use(auth), ensuring authentication middleware is applied as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all procedures in the routers directory use authentication middleware # Test: Search for procedure definitions. Expect: All to use .use(auth) rg -g '*.ts' -A 1 'export const \w+ = t\.procedure' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routersLength of output: 7486
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/createRootKey.ts (6)
4-4: LGTM: Import changes align with new authentication approach.The import of
authandtfrom "../../trpc" is consistent with the transition fromrateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth), aligning with the PR objective of reverting rate limits.
14-15: LGTM: Function signature updated to use new authentication approach.The transition from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)successfully implements the new authentication approach, removing rate limiting as intended. This change is consistent with the PR objective and similar modifications in other files.
20-22: LGTM: Minor formatting improvements in input validation.The input validation logic remains intact, with minor formatting changes that enhance readability and maintain consistency with the codebase style.
185-185: LGTM: Minor formatting improvement in audit log creation.The audit log creation logic remains intact, with a minor formatting change that enhances readability and maintains consistency with the codebase style.
193-193: LGTM: Minor formatting improvement in permission insertion.The permission insertion logic remains unchanged, with a minor formatting adjustment that enhances readability and maintains consistency with the codebase style.
Line range hint
1-205: Overall LGTM: Successful implementation of new authentication approach and improved error handling.The changes in this file successfully transition from the rate-limited procedure to the new authentication approach using
t.procedure.use(auth). The modifications align well with the PR objectives and are consistent with changes in other files mentioned in the AI-generated summary.Key improvements include:
- Removal of rate limiting
- Enhanced error handling and logging
- Improved transaction management
- Better code organization and readability
These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase while addressing the primary goal of reverting rate limits.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectRoleFromKey.ts (2)
6-8: Procedure updated with authentication middlewareThe procedure now uses
t.procedure.use(auth), replacing the previousrateLimitedProcedure. This change ensures that only authenticated users can invoke this mutation, which aligns with the goal to revert rate limits and enhance security through authentication.
43-44: Verify the additionalkeyIdcondition in the deletion criteriaAdding
eq(schema.keysRoles.keyId, input.keyId)to the.whereclause further narrows down the deletion to a specific key-role association. This seems appropriate to prevent unintended deletions of other associations. Please confirm that this change aligns with the intended behavior and ensure consistency across related operations.Run the following script to check for other deletions from
schema.keysRolesand verify if they include thekeyIdcondition:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
keyIdcondition is consistently applied in all deletion operations.
- All deletions from
schema.keysRolesinclude thekeyIdcondition, ensuring targeted removal of specific key-role associations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all deletion operations on 'schema.keysRoles' and display their where clauses. # Search for delete operations on schema.keysRoles in TypeScript files rg -t ts $'delete(schema.keysRoles)' -A 5 # Expected Result: Review the output to ensure that deletions consistently include the 'keyId' condition where appropriate.Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all deletion operations on 'schema.keysRoles' using various patterns and display their where clauses. # Search for delete operations on schema.keysRoles with different possible patterns in TypeScript files rg -t ts 'schema\.keysRoles\s*\.\s*delete' -A 5 rg -t ts 'delete\s*\(\s*schema\.keysRoles' -A 5 # Expected Result: Review the output to ensure that deletions consistently include the 'keyId' condition where appropriate.Length of output: 2159
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateEnabled.ts (5)
6-6: Correct Import ofauthandtThe import statement correctly imports
authandtfrom"../../trpc", ensuring that the authentication middleware and procedure creator are available.
7-8: Removal of Rate Limiting from ProcedureThe procedure has been changed from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing the rate limiting. Confirm that removing rate limiting is intentional and aligns with the PR objective to revert rate limits.
13-13: Input Validation Remains ConsistentThe input schema remains unchanged, correctly validating
keyIdas a string andenabledas a boolean.
Line range hint
25-33: Consistent and Clear Error HandlingThe use of
TRPCErrorprovides consistent and clear error messages for internal server errors and not found conditions, enhancing user feedback.
Line range hint
55-60: Audit Logging Implemented CorrectlyThe
insertAuditLogsfunction captures all necessary details, including workspace ID, actor information, event type, description, resources, and context, ensuring comprehensive audit trails.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/optIntoBeta.ts (1)
6-8: Verify the implications of removing rate limiting from this procedureBy replacing
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)witht.procedure.use(auth), rate limiting has been removed from theoptWorkspaceIntoBetaprocedure. Ensure that this change is intentional and that removing rate limiting does not expose the system to potential abuse or performance issues.Run the following script to identify other procedures that still use rate limiting, to assess the overall impact:
✅ Verification successful
Rate Limiting Removal in 'optWorkspaceIntoBeta' Procedure Verified
Rate limiting has been successfully removed from the specified procedure as intended. Other procedures continue to enforce rate limiting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all procedures using rateLimitedProcedure # Search for usages of rateLimitedProcedure in the codebase rg 'rateLimitedProcedure'Length of output: 6981
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createPermission.ts (1)
16-17: Confirm the removal of rate limiting on this procedureThe
rateLimitedProcedurehas been replaced witht.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing rate limiting from thecreatePermissionendpoint. Ensure that this change is intentional and that the application can handle potential increases in request volume without impacting performance or security.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/delete.ts (2)
7-9: Appropriate use of authentication middlewareThe transition from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)correctly incorporates authentication, ensuring that only authenticated users can access thedeleteLlmGatewayprocedure. This change enhances security and aligns with the intent to remove rate limiting.
35-36: Consistent and clear error messagingThe updated error message provides clarity and maintains consistency with other error messages in the codebase, improving the user experience when the LLM gateway is not found.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectPermissionFromRole.ts (3)
7-8: Procedure Transition to Auth Middleware ConfirmedThe change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)successfully updates the procedure to use authentication middleware, enhancing security for this operation.
Line range hint
38-45: Check Deletion Result for ConfirmationAfter attempting to delete the role-permission association, it's good practice to check if any records were affected. This can help detect if the specified association did not exist, allowing for more informative feedback to the user.
Consider modifying the deletion to capture the result:
await tx .delete(schema.rolesPermissions) .where( and( eq(schema.rolesPermissions.workspaceId, workspace.id), eq(schema.rolesPermissions.roleId, input.roleId), eq(schema.rolesPermissions.permissionId, input.permissionId) ) + ) + .then(result => { + if (result.rowCount === 0) { + throw new TRPCError({ + code: "NOT_FOUND", + message: "The specified role-permission association does not exist.", + }); + } });
Line range hint
67-74: Avoid Suppressing Errors in Transaction Catch BlockSimilar to the earlier error handling, catching errors in the transaction's
.catch()block and throwing a generic error can hide useful debugging information. Consider refining the error handling to capture and log specific errors, or allow unhandled exceptions to propagate to a global error handler.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateOwnerId.ts (1)
6-8: Ensure removing rate limiting is intentional and acceptableBy replacing
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure.use(auth), the rate limiting functionality has been removed from this procedure. Confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the application's performance and security requirements.Run the following script to identify any remaining usages of
rateLimitedProcedurein the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Rate Limiting Removal Confirmed
The removal of
rateLimitedProcedureinupdateOwnerId.tsis intentional and does not impact other parts of the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `rateLimitedProcedure` in the codebase. # Test: Expect to find no unintended usages of `rateLimitedProcedure`. rg 'rateLimitedProcedure'Length of output: 6981
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateName.ts (1)
10-11: Confirm that removing rate limiting is acceptable.The procedure has been updated from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing rate limiting. Ensure that this change aligns with the application's security and performance requirements to prevent potential abuse of the endpoint.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deletePermission.ts (2)
6-8: Confirming the transition to authentication middlewareReplacing
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure.use(auth)ensures that only authenticated users can access thedeletePermissionprocedure, enhancing security.
54-55: Ensuring permission deletion is scoped to the workspaceAdding the condition
eq(schema.permissions.workspaceId, workspace.id)in the delete operation ensures that only permissions belonging to the current workspace can be deleted, preventing cross-workspace deletions.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/deleteRootKey.ts (2)
43-43: Approved: Added filter to exclude already deleted keys.Adding
isNull(table.deletedAt)ensures that only keys that are not marked as deleted are selected. This prevents redundant operations on keys that have already been deleted.
57-58: Approved: Correct extraction of key IDs for deletion.Using
rootKeys.map((k) => k.id)accurately extracts the IDs of the keys to be deleted, which are then used in theinArraycondition. This ensures that the update operation targets the correct records.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changeName.ts (2)
12-14: Input Validation is CorrectThe input validation for the
namefield is appropriate, enforcing a minimum length of 3 characters.
7-9: Verify Removal of Rate LimitingThe procedure has been updated from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth), which removes rate limiting. Please ensure that this change is intentional and that removing rate limits does not introduce potential abuse vectors.Run the following script to identify any remaining usages of
rateLimitedProcedurein the codebase:apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updateRole.ts (2)
15-16: Confirm that removing rate limiting is acceptable.Changing from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedureremoves rate limiting from this procedure. Ensure that this change aligns with the application's security requirements and that removing rate limiting will not lead to potential abuse or performance issues.If this change is intentional as part of reverting rate limits, consider verifying that other security measures are in place to prevent abuse.
6-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove unused imports of
rateLimitedProcedureandratelimit.Since you've replaced
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure, the importsrateLimitedProcedureandratelimitfrom"@/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure"are no longer needed. Removing unused imports helps keep the code clean.Apply this diff to remove the unused imports:
-import { rateLimitedProcedure, ratelimit } from "@/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure";Likely invalid or redundant comment.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.ts (1)
8-10: Confirm Removal of Rate LimitingThe
rateLimitedProcedurehas been replaced witht.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing rate limiting from this procedure. If this change aligns with the PR objective to revert rate limits, please ensure that removing rate limiting does not expose the endpoint to abuse or excessive usage. Consider whether alternative measures are needed to protect this endpoint.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updatePermission.ts (2)
6-6: Import statement is appropriateThe import of
authandtfrom"../../trpc"is correct and necessary for the updated procedure definition.
15-16: Update to authentication middleware aligns with PR objectivesReplacing
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)witht.procedure.use(auth)removes the rate-limiting middleware in favor of authentication. This change fulfills the PR's goal to revert rate limits and ensures that only authenticated users can access theupdatePermissionprocedure.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts (1)
6-6: Import statement correctly adds authentication middleware.The import of
authandtfrom"../../trpc"is necessary for utilizing the authentication middleware with the procedure.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateExpiration.ts (2)
6-8: Transition aligns with PR objectives by removing rate limitingThe change from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth)removes rate limiting and enforces authentication via middleware, which aligns with the PR's intent to revert rate limits.
83-85: Ensure 'input.expiration' is safely used in audit log descriptionWhen constructing the audit log description,
input.expiration.toUTCString()is called. To prevent potential runtime errors ifinput.expirationisnullor undefined, ensure that it is a validDateobject before this call.Run the following script to check for all usages of
input.expirationand confirm it is properly validated:apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectRoleToKey.ts (2)
6-8: Confirm the removal of rate limitingThe
connectRoleToKeyprocedure has been changed fromrateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth), which removes rate limiting from this endpoint. Please ensure that this change is intentional and that it aligns with the application's security and performance requirements.
6-8: Code changes are appropriate and align with authentication practicesSwitching to
t.procedure.use(auth)correctly applies the authentication middleware to the procedure. This change is consistent with the updated pattern and enhances the security by ensuring authenticated access.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateIpWhitelist.ts (3)
8-9: Imports updated to include 't' and 'auth'The new imports correctly bring in
tandauthfrom"../../trpc"for use in defining the procedure.
70-71: Validation and transformation of IP whitelistThe concatenation of
input.ipWhitelistinto a comma-separated string appears correct. Since IP addresses are validated earlier using Zod's schema, this transformation should be safe.
10-11: Removal of rate limiting in procedure definitionThe change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)removes rate limiting and adds authentication middleware. Please confirm that removing the rate limiting aligns with the PR's objective and does not adversely affect the application's functionality.Run the following script to ensure that
rateLimitedProcedureis no longer used elsewhere in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Rate limiting removal confirmed for updateIpWhitelist.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining usages of 'rateLimitedProcedure' rg 'rateLimitedProcedure'Length of output: 6981
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRemaining.ts (1)
6-8: Verify the removal of rate limitingThe
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)has been replaced witht.procedure.use(auth). Ensure that removing the rate limiting is intentional and that it doesn't adversely affect the application's performance or expose it to abuse.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateOverride.ts (2)
7-9: Verify the removal of rate limiting middlewareThe procedure has been changed from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing the rate limiting middleware. If the intention is to revert rate limits as per the PR title, please ensure that this change doesn't introduce any security vulnerabilities or expose the endpoint to potential abuse due to the lack of rate limiting.
21-22: Confirm the correctness of the query conditionsThe
whereclause in thefindFirstquery has been updated. Please verify that the use ofand,eq, andisNullaccurately reflects the intended logic to find the correctratelimitOverride. This ensures that the override is correctly fetched without any unintended records.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (3)
6-8: Verify the removal of rate limitingThe procedure has been changed from using
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth), effectively removing rate limiting. Ensure that removing rate limiting is intentional and does not expose the system to potential abuse or excessive requests.
44-44: Appropriate addition ofisNull(table.deletedAt)Including
isNull(table.deletedAt)in the query ensures that only active keys are considered, preventing operations on deleted entries.
77-85: Enhanced readability of thewhereclauseThe expanded
whereclause improves readability and maintainability by clearly outlining each condition.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createOverride.ts (1)
59-60: Appropriate Filtering of Deleted OverridesAdding
isNull(schema.ratelimitOverrides.deletedAt)ensures that only active overrides are counted, excluding any that have been deleted. This change improves data accuracy when checking the existing number of overrides.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteNamespace.ts (1)
7-7: Import statement is appropriateThe
authandtare correctly imported from"../../trpc"to support the updated procedure structure.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/addPermissionToRootKey.ts (1)
8-10: Ensure the removal of rate limiting is intentionalBy replacing
rateLimitedProcedurewitht.procedure.use(auth), the rate limiting middleware has been removed from this procedure. Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with our security policies, as removing rate limiting may expose the endpoint to abuse through excessive requests.apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createRole.ts (2)
7-7: Import of authentication middleware is appropriateThe addition of
authandtfrom"../../trpc"correctly supports the new authentication mechanism in the procedure.
16-17: Verify the impact of removing rate limiting on the 'createRole' procedureBy replacing
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create)witht.procedure.use(auth), the rate limiting has been removed from thecreateRoleprocedure. Ensure that this change aligns with the application's security requirements and does not expose the endpoint to potential abuse through excessive requests.Consider implementing alternative protective measures if rate limiting is still necessary to prevent abuse.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changePlan.ts (1)
9-11: Authentication Middleware Correctly AppliedThe procedure is correctly updated to use the authentication middleware with
t.procedure.use(auth). This change ensures that only authenticated users can change the workspace plan.
| .input( | ||
| z.object({ | ||
| roleId: z.string(), | ||
| }), | ||
| }) | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing input validation.
While the current input validation checks for the presence of roleId as a string, consider adding more robust validation:
- Validate the format of
roleId(e.g., UUID format if applicable). - Add a maximum length constraint to prevent overly long inputs.
Example enhancement:
z.object({
roleId: z.string().uuid().max(36),
})This would improve data integrity and security by ensuring the roleId matches expected formats.
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | ||
| export const deleteRole = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete removal of rate limiting in the codebase.
Several files still import and use rateLimitedProcedure, which indicates that rate limiting has not been fully removed as intended:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/delete.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.ts- (and others as listed in the shell script output)
Please ensure that all instances of rateLimitedProcedure are removed or appropriately refactored.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve changes to procedure definition and suggest verification.
The changes from rateLimitedProcedure to t.procedure.use(auth) align with the PR objective of reverting rate limits. The authentication middleware is now explicitly added, which is a good practice for security.
To ensure the rate limiting has been consistently removed, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify removal of rate limiting across the codebase
# Test: Search for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Searching for remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg "rateLimitedProcedure" -g '!package-lock.json'
# Test: Confirm t.procedure.use(auth) pattern is used consistently
echo "Confirming t.procedure.use(auth) pattern:"
rg "t\.procedure\.use\(auth\)" -g '!package-lock.json'
Length of output: 7371
| @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ import { db, eq, schema } from "@/lib/db"; | |||
| import { TRPCError } from "@trpc/server"; | |||
| import { z } from "zod"; | |||
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | |||
|
|
|||
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant import statement
This import statement is redundant as it's already present at line 5. Please remove this line to avoid redeclaration errors.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-import { auth, t } from "../../trpc";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'auth'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'auth' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 't'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
't' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| @@ -4,17 +4,19 @@ import { z } from "zod"; | |||
| import { insertAuditLogs } from "@/lib/audit"; | |||
| import { db, eq, schema } from "@/lib/db"; | |||
| import { rateLimitedProcedure, ratelimit } from "@/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure"; | |||
|
|
|||
| export const deleteOverride = rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create) | |||
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove Unused Import rateLimitedProcedure
The rateLimitedProcedure import in deleteOverride.ts is not used and can be safely removed to clean up the code.
- File:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider cleaning up unused imports.
The addition of auth and t imports aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits. This change supports the transition from rateLimitedProcedure to t.procedure.use(auth).
To ensure code cleanliness, let's verify if there are any unused imports:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for unused imports in the file
# Test: Look for potentially unused imports
rg -n '(rateLimitedProcedure|ratelimit)' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts
Length of output: 6907
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if 'rateLimitedProcedure' and 'ratelimit' are used in deleteOverride.ts
# Search for usage of 'rateLimitedProcedure' and 'ratelimit' in deleteOverride.ts
rg -n '(rateLimitedProcedure|ratelimit)' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts
Length of output: 485
| export const updateNamespaceName = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Inconsistent application of rate limit changes.
Multiple files still use rateLimitedProcedure, indicating the changes to t.procedure.use(auth) are not consistently applied across the codebase. Please ensure all relevant areas are updated to maintain consistency and security.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Authentication middleware added.
The change from rateLimitedProcedure to t.procedure.use(auth) aligns with the PR objective and enhances security by adding authentication middleware.
Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) across the codebase
# Test: Search for occurrences of t.procedure.use(auth)
echo "Occurrences of t.procedure.use(auth):"
rg -c "t\.procedure\.use\(auth\)"
# Test: Search for any remaining occurrences of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Remaining occurrences of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg "rateLimitedProcedure"
Length of output: 7239
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | ||
| export const createOverride = t.procedure |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possible Removal of Rate Limiting
The change from rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create) to t.procedure.use(auth) may have unintentionally removed the rate limiting functionality from this procedure. If rate limiting is still required for createOverride, please ensure it is correctly re-implemented to prevent potential abuse.
Consider reintroducing rate limiting by applying the rateLimitedProcedure as follows:
-import { auth, t } from "../../trpc";
+import { auth, t, rateLimitedProcedure } from "../../trpc";
-export const createOverride = t.procedure
+export const createOverride = rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create)
.use(auth)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ export const deleteNamespace = rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.delete) | |||
| location: ctx.audit.location, | |||
| userAgent: ctx.audit.userAgent, | |||
| }, | |||
| })), | |||
| })) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the error message in the catch block
The error message in the catch block incorrectly states, "We are unable to delete the namespaces," which may cause confusion. Since this block handles errors related to deleting rate limit overrides, consider updating the message to accurately reflect the issue.
Apply this diff to correct the error message:
throw new TRPCError({
code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR",
- message:
- "We are unable to delete the namespaces. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",
+ message:
+ "We are unable to delete the rate limit overrides. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",
});Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| export const deleteNamespace = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Rate Limiting Removed from deleteNamespace Procedure
The deleteNamespace procedure no longer uses the rateLimitedProcedure, which means rate limiting is not enforced for this operation. To maintain rate limiting and prevent potential abuse, consider reintroducing the rate limiting middleware.
- File:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteNamespace.ts- Lines: 8-9
🔗 Analysis chain
Potential removal of rate limiting
Replacing rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.delete) with t.procedure.use(auth) removes the rate limiting middleware from the deleteNamespace procedure. If rate limiting is still required for this operation, consider reintroducing it to prevent potential abuse.
To verify if rate limiting is enforced elsewhere, you can search the codebase for rate limiting implementations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if rate limiting is applied to the `deleteNamespace` procedure elsewhere.
# Search for rate limiting middleware usages in TRPC routers.
rg 'rateLimitedProcedure|ratelimit' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 87028
| message: | ||
| "We are unable to create role. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider logging caught errors internally for debugging
In the catch blocks where errors are rethrown with a generic message, the original errors are not logged. While it's appropriate to present a generic message to the client, logging the original error internally would aid in debugging and monitoring.
Apply this diff to log the errors internally:
// First catch block
.catch((err) => {
+ console.error("Error fetching workspace:", err);
throw new TRPCError({
code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR",
message:
"We are unable to create role. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",
});
});
// Second catch block
.catch((err) => {
+ console.error("Error during role creation transaction:", err);
throw new TRPCError({
code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR",
message:
"We are unable to create role. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",
});
});Also applies to: 122-123
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| const paymentMethods = await stripe.customers.listPaymentMethods( | ||
| workspace.stripeCustomerId, | ||
| workspace.stripeCustomerId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Missing 'type' Parameter in Stripe's listPaymentMethods Call
The call to stripe.customers.listPaymentMethods is missing the required type parameter. According to the Stripe API, you need to specify the type of payment method to retrieve, such as 'card'.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const paymentMethods = await stripe.customers.listPaymentMethods(
workspace.stripeCustomerId
+ { type: 'card' }
);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateName.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-17: Address unusedworkspaceIdin input schema.The
workspaceIdis still present in the input schema but not utilized within the procedure. This could lead to confusion or potential security oversights.Consider incorporating
workspaceIdinto the database query to ensure the API belongs to the specified workspace:const api = await db.query.apis .findFirst({ where: (table, { eq, and, isNull }) => - and(eq(table.id, input.apiId), isNull(table.deletedAt)), + and( + eq(table.id, input.apiId), + eq(table.workspaceId, input.workspaceId), + isNull(table.deletedAt) + ), with: { workspace: true, }, })This change will enhance security by validating that the API belongs to the specified workspace before allowing updates.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts (1)
Line range hint
53-93: LGTM: Transaction implementation ensures data integrity.The use of a database transaction for API creation and audit logging is a good practice, ensuring atomicity of operations.
Consider consolidating error handling within the transaction:
await db .transaction(async (tx) => { await tx .insert(schema.apis) .values({ id: apiId, name: input.name, workspaceId: ws.id, keyAuthId, authType: "key", ipWhitelist: null, createdAt: new Date(), - }) - .catch((_err) => { - throw new TRPCError({ - code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", - message: - "We are unable to create the API. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", - }); }); await insertAuditLogs(tx, { // ... (audit log details) }); + }) + .catch((_err) => { + throw new TRPCError({ + code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", + message: "We are unable to create the API. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", + }); });This change would handle errors for both the API insertion and audit log creation in a single catch block, reducing code duplication.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (3)
Line range hint
18-25: Approve error handling with a minor suggestion.The addition of error handling for the workspace query improves the function's robustness. The use of
TRPCErroris consistent with tRPC best practices.Consider slightly modifying the error message for clarity:
- message: - "We are unable to remove permission from the root key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", + message: + "An error occurred while fetching the workspace. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev if the issue persists.",This change more accurately reflects the specific operation that failed.
Line range hint
40-53: Approve transaction changes with logging improvement suggestion.The reformatting of the key query and the addition of error handling for the entire transaction improve code readability and robustness.
Consider enhancing the error logging in the catch block:
.catch((err) => { - console.error(err); + console.error('Error in removePermissionFromRootKey transaction:', err); throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "We are unable to remove permission from the root key. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", }); });This change will provide more context in the error logs, making it easier to diagnose issues in production.
Also applies to: 86-93
Incomplete Removal of Rate Limiting and Inconsistent Authentication Middleware
Several instances of
rateLimitedProcedureremain in the codebase, andt.procedure.use(auth)is not consistently applied across all procedures:
Remaining
rateLimitedProcedureinstances:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac.tsInconsistent use of
t.procedure.use(auth):
- Only found in
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/trpc.tsPlease address these issues to ensure the removal of rate limiting is complete and authentication middleware is uniformly applied.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-93: Approve overall structure and functionality.The changes to the
removePermissionFromRootKeyprocedure maintain its core functionality while improving error handling and security. The procedure follows tRPC best practices, including:
- Input validation using zod schema
- Proper authorization checks
- Comprehensive audit logging
- Consistent error handling using
TRPCErrorThe removal of rate limiting aligns with the PR objectives and appears to be consistently applied across the codebase.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help confirm that the changes have been applied uniformly across all relevant files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent removal of rate limiting and addition of auth middleware # Test 1: Check for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure echo "Checking for remaining rateLimitedProcedure instances:" rg "rateLimitedProcedure" --type ts # Test 2: Verify consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) echo "Verifying consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth):" rg "t\.procedure\.use\(auth\)" --type tsLength of output: 2225
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the removal of rate limiting and the consistent use of auth middleware # Test 1: Re-check for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure echo "Re-checking for remaining rateLimitedProcedure instances:" rg "rateLimitedProcedure" --type ts # Test 2: Correctly verify the consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) echo "Verifying consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth):" rg "t\\.procedure\\.use\\(auth\\)" --type tsLength of output: 2087
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createRole.ts (1)
Line range hint
29-33: Consider logging caught errors internally for debuggingWhile this isn't directly related to the current PR objectives, the suggestion from a previous review to log caught errors internally is still valid and would improve debugging capabilities.
Consider applying the following changes to both catch blocks:
.catch((err) => { + console.error("Error in createRole:", err); throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "We are unable to create role. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", }); });This change would help with internal error tracking without exposing sensitive information to the client.
Also applies to: 116-120
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createNamespace.ts (1)
Line range hint
75-77: Typo in error messageThe error message in the
INTERNAL_SERVER_ERRORcase has a typo: "We are unable to create namspace" should be "We are unable to create namespace."Apply this diff to fix the typo:
message: - "We are unable to create namspace. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev", + "We are unable to create namespace. Please try again or contact support@unkey.dev",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/delete.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultBytes.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateDeleteProtection.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateIpWhitelist.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/create.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/createRootKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/delete.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/deleteRootKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateEnabled.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateExpiration.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateMetadata.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateOwnerId.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRatelimit.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRemaining.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRootKeyName.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/delete.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createNamespace.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createOverride.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteNamespace.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateNamespaceName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateOverride.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/addPermissionToRootKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectPermissionToRole.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectRoleToKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createPermission.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createRole.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deletePermission.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deleteRole.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectPermissionFromRole.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectRoleFromKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updatePermission.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updateRole.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changeName.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changePlan.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/create.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/optIntoBeta.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRootKeyName.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (32)
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/delete.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultBytes.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/setDefaultPrefix.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateDeleteProtection.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateIpWhitelist.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/create.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/createRootKey.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/delete.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/deleteRootKey.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateEnabled.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateExpiration.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateMetadata.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateName.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateOwnerId.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRatelimit.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/key/updateRemaining.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/delete.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteNamespace.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/deleteOverride.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateOverride.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/addPermissionToRootKey.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectPermissionToRole.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createPermission.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deletePermission.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/deleteRole.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectPermissionFromRole.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/disconnectRoleFromKey.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updateRole.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changeName.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/changePlan.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/create.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/workspace/optIntoBeta.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (17)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/updateName.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The new import statement brings in the necessary
authandtobjects, which are used in the updated procedure definition. This change aligns well with the modifications made to theupdateApiNameprocedure.
9-10: LGTM: Procedure definition updated correctly.The change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits while enhancing security through authentication.Please verify that removing rate limiting doesn't negatively impact the system's protection against abuse. Run the following script to check for any remaining rate limit implementations:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/llmGateway/create.ts (3)
Line range hint
29-35: Improved error handling for workspace query.The new error handling provides a more specific and user-friendly message when a workspace is not found. The use of the "NOT_FOUND" error code is appropriate for this scenario.
Line range hint
66-76: Enhance error handling for duplicate entries and prevent potential runtime errors.The improved error message for duplicate entries is more informative and provides clear instructions to the user. However, there's still a potential runtime error when accessing
err.body.message.To address both improvements and prevent potential runtime errors, apply this diff:
-if (err instanceof DatabaseError && err.body.message.includes("Duplicate entry")) { +if (err instanceof DatabaseError && err.body?.message?.includes("Duplicate entry")) { throw new TRPCError({ code: "PRECONDITION_FAILED", message: "Gateway subdomains must have unique names. Please try a different subdomain. <br/> If you believe this is an error and the subdomain should not be in use already, please contact support at support@unkey.dev", }); } throw new TRPCError({ code: "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", message: "Unable to create gateway, please contact support at support@unkey.dev", });This change prevents potential runtime errors by safely accessing
err.body.messagewhile maintaining the improved error handling.
7-9: LGTM: Authentication middleware replaces rate limiting.The change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits and enhances security by incorporating authentication middleware.Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/updatePermission.ts (3)
5-5: LGTM: Import change aligns with authentication update.The new import
{ auth, t } from "../../trpc"correctly supports the transition from rate limiting to authentication-based access control.
Line range hint
16-93: LGTM: Function body appropriately preserved.The core logic, error handling, and audit logging remain intact, which is correct given that the authentication change doesn't affect the internal workings of the function.
To ensure consistency in error handling across similar functions, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Error handling is consistent across RBAC-related functions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency in error handling across similar functions # Test: Check for consistent use of TRPCError in RBAC-related functions rg -p 'new TRPCError\(\{' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac # Test: Verify consistent error messages rg -p 'message:.*"We are unable to' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbacLength of output: 3387
14-15: LGTM: Function signature updated to use authentication.The change from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.update)tot.procedure.use(auth)correctly implements the authentication-based access control, aligning with the PR objective.To ensure the
authmiddleware is correctly implemented, please run the following verification script:apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts (2)
Line range hint
22-31: LGTM: Standardized error handling.The error handling for database operations has been standardized, which improves consistency and maintainability across the codebase.
Also applies to: 39-45, 66-72, 95-101
Line range hint
1-108: Summary: Improved authentication and database operations, rate limiting removed.The changes in this file align with the PR objectives:
- Rate limiting has been removed and replaced with authentication middleware.
- Database operations are now wrapped in a transaction, improving data integrity.
- Error handling has been standardized across the procedure.
These changes enhance the overall code quality and maintainability. However, ensure that the removal of rate limiting doesn't expose the API to potential abuse.
To further verify the implications of removing rate limiting, consider reviewing the following:
- Check if there's a global rate limiting middleware applied elsewhere in the application.
- Verify if there are any API gateway or infrastructure-level rate limiting measures in place.
- Review the authentication middleware (
auth) to ensure it provides adequate protection against potential abuse.✅ Verification successful
Rate Limiting Remains Globally Applied
Rate limiting is still enforced globally across the application, ensuring protection against abuse even after its removal from this specific API route.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for global rate limiting or protection measures # Search for global middleware or rate limiting configurations rg -i '(global|app).*(middleware|rate.?limit)' --type ts # Check for authentication middleware implementation rg 'export const auth' --type tsLength of output: 875
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/updateNamespaceName.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objective.The import of
authandtfrom "../../trpc" is consistent with the PR's goal of reverting rate limits and aligns with the changes observed in other files.
7-8: LGTM: Procedure definition updated correctly.The change from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)is correct and consistent with the PR objective. This update:
- Addresses the previous inconsistency in applying rate limit changes.
- Enhances security by adding authentication middleware.
- Maintains the original functionality of the procedure.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/connectRoleToKey.ts (2)
Line range hint
29-33: Approve enhanced error handling.The error handling has been significantly improved with more specific and informative error messages for various scenarios. The consistent use of
TRPCErrorwith appropriate error codes enhances the API's robustness and aligns with the changes seen in other files of this PR.Also applies to: 39-43, 46-50, 53-57, 72-76, 101-105
6-7: Approve authentication changes and verify consistency.The addition of authentication middleware via
.use(auth)enhances the security of the API endpoint while preserving the core functionality. This change aligns with the PR objectives and is consistent with modifications in other files.To ensure consistent implementation of authentication across the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent implementation of authentication middleware # Test: Check for consistent use of auth middleware in procedure definitions echo "Checking for consistent use of auth middleware in procedure definitions:" rg '\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' -g '!*.md' -A 5apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/removePermissionFromRootKey.ts (1)
5-7: Approve changes with security considerations.The switch from
rateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth)aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits. The addition of authentication middleware enhances security. However, the removal of rate limiting might impact API abuse prevention.To ensure this change doesn't introduce security vulnerabilities, please verify:
- The
authmiddleware provides sufficient protection against potential API abuse.- There are alternative measures in place to prevent excessive API calls.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other rate limiting or API protection mechanisms # Test 1: Search for other rate limiting implementations echo "Searching for other rate limiting implementations:" rg -i "rate.?limit|throttle" --type ts # Test 2: Check for API Gateway or middleware that might handle rate limiting echo "Checking for API Gateway or middleware configurations:" fd -e yaml -e json -e js -e ts | xargs rg -i "api.?gateway|middleware|rate.?limit"apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createOverride.ts (1)
7-9: Verify the intentional removal of rate limitingThe change from
rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create)tot.procedure.use(auth)removes the explicit rate limiting for this endpoint. While this aligns with the PR objective of reverting rate limits, please confirm if this change is intentional and doesn't expose the endpoint to potential abuse.Consider the following:
- Is rate limiting still necessary for this endpoint?
- If yes, how will it be implemented now?
- Are there any security implications of removing the rate limit?
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script to check for other usages of
rateLimitedProcedurein the codebase:This will help determine if this change is consistent across the codebase or if it's an isolated modification.
✅ Verification successful
Rate limiting removal in
createOverride.tsis intentional and scoped correctlyThe removal of
rateLimitedProcedureinapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/createOverride.tsis isolated to this endpoint. Other parts of the codebase still enforce rate limiting, ensuring that the system remains protected against potential abuse.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of rateLimitedProcedure in the codebase # Test: Search for rateLimitedProcedure usage echo "Searching for rateLimitedProcedure usage:" rg "rateLimitedProcedure" --type ts # Test: Search for ratelimit.create usage echo "\nSearching for ratelimit.create usage:" rg "ratelimit\.create" --type tsLength of output: 2596
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac/createRole.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives.The modification of the import statement to include
authandtfrom "../../trpc" is consistent with the PR's goal of reverting rate limits. This change supports the transition fromrateLimitedProceduretot.procedure.use(auth), centralizing authentication handling.
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const createApi = rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create) | ||
| export const createApi = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Security Issue: Missing Rate Limiting
Removing rate limiting from createApi may expose this endpoint to abuse since no global rate limiting is enforced across the application.
- File:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/api/create.ts - Lines: 7-10
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Authentication middleware added.
The change from a rate-limited procedure to t.procedure.use(auth) aligns with the PR objective and implements consistent authentication across routes.
To ensure this change doesn't compromise security, let's verify the rate limiting implementation elsewhere:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of rate limiting in other parts of the application.
# Search for rate limiting implementations
rg -i 'rate.?limit' --type ts
Length of output: 142632
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if authentication middleware includes rate limiting protections.
# Search for middleware that uses both 'auth' and 'ratelimit' in their setup
rg -i 'use\(' --type ts | grep -iE 'auth.*ratelimit|ratelimit.*auth'
Length of output: 583
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for global rate limiting configurations or services applied across the entire application.
# Look for global rate limit settings in configuration files
rg -i 'rate.?limi?t' --type ts,cjs,json,yml,yaml,env,js | grep -iE 'global|application|server|middleware'
# Search for rate limiting implemented in a centralized service or utility
rg -i 'export\s+.*ratelimit' --type ts,js | grep -iE 'global|central'
# Check for any rate limiting applied at the server level (e.g., within server setup files)
rg -i 'use\(' --type ts,js | grep -iE 'rate.?limit|limiter|throttle'
Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for global rate limiting configurations or services applied across the entire application.
# Look for global rate limit settings in configuration files
rg -i 'rate.?limi?t' -g '*.ts' -g '*.cjs' -g '*.json' -g '*.yml' -g '*.yaml' -g '*.env' -g '*.js' | grep -iE 'global|application|server|middleware'
# Search for rate limiting implemented in a centralized service or utility
rg -i 'export\s+.*ratelimit' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' | grep -iE 'global|central'
# Check for any rate limiting applied at the server level (e.g., within server setup files)
rg -i 'use\(' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' | grep -iE 'rate.?limit|limiter|throttle'
Length of output: 2647
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | ||
| export const updateNamespaceName = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent application of authentication changes detected.
There are 16 remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure across the codebase. Please update these instances to ensure consistency:
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/ratelimitProcedure.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistency of authentication changes across the codebase.
The changes in this file look good and align with the PR objectives. To ensure complete implementation:
- Verify that similar changes have been applied consistently across all relevant files.
- Check for any remaining instances of
rateLimitedProcedurethat might need updating.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent application of authentication changes
# Check for remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg "rateLimitedProcedure" --type ts
# Check for new instances of t.procedure.use(auth)
echo "New instances of t.procedure.use(auth):"
rg "t\.procedure\.use\(auth\)" --type ts
# Compare the counts
rateLimitedCount=$(rg "rateLimitedProcedure" --type ts | wc -l)
authCount=$(rg "t\.procedure\.use\(auth\)" --type ts | wc -l)
echo "Count of rateLimitedProcedure: $rateLimitedCount"
echo "Count of t.procedure.use(auth): $authCount"
if [ $rateLimitedCount -eq 0 ] && [ $authCount -gt 0 ]; then
echo "All instances appear to have been updated successfully."
else
echo "There might be inconsistencies in the updates. Please review the results."
fi
Length of output: 2504
| import { auth, t } from "../../trpc"; | ||
| export const connectRoleToKey = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Rate limiting still present in multiple files.
Several instances of rateLimitedProcedure remain in the codebase, indicating that rate limiting has not been fully removed.
apps/www/content/blog/learn-by-building.mdxapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve changes and verify rate limit removal.
The changes to import statements and function signature align with the PR objective of reverting rate limits. The shift from rateLimitedProcedure to t.procedure.use(auth) introduces authentication middleware, which is consistent with changes across other files in this PR.
To ensure that rate limiting has been completely removed, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify removal of rate limiting across the codebase
# Test: Search for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Searching for remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg 'rateLimitedProcedure' -g '!*.md'
# Test: Confirm consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) pattern
echo "Confirming consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) pattern:"
rg 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' -g '!*.md'
Length of output: 453
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify removal of rate limiting and ensure consistent use of auth middleware
# Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Searching for remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg 'rateLimitedProcedure' -g '!*.md'
# Test 2: Confirm consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) pattern
echo "Confirming consistent use of t.procedure.use(auth) pattern:"
rg 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' -g '!*.md' -A 5
Length of output: 2298
| export const createRole = t.procedure | ||
| .use(auth) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Remaining Rate Limiting Instances Detected
The shell script results indicate that rateLimitedProcedure is still present in multiple router files:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.tsapps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/rbac.ts
Please ensure that all instances of rateLimitedProcedure are addressed to fully align with the PR's objective of removing rate limiting.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Procedure definition updated as per PR objectives.
The change from rateLimitedProcedure(ratelimit.create) to t.procedure.use(auth) successfully removes the rate limiting while introducing authentication middleware. This aligns with the PR's goal of reverting rate limits and is consistent with changes across other files in this PR.
To ensure the effectiveness of the new authentication mechanism, please verify that:
- The
authmiddleware correctly authenticates requests. - There are no unintended side effects from removing rate limiting.
You can use the following script to check for consistent usage of t.procedure.use(auth) across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of t.procedure.use(auth) across the codebase
# Test: Search for occurrences of t.procedure.use(auth)
echo "Checking for consistent usage of t.procedure.use(auth):"
rg -n 't\.procedure\.use\(auth\)' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers
# Test: Search for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of rateLimitedProcedure:"
rg -n 'rateLimitedProcedure' apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers
Length of output: 1999
What does this PR do?
Fixes # (issue)
If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists
Type of change
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
t.procedure, enhancing the overall codebase organization.