-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 8_use_unkey_blog.md #2580
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new blog entry to the existing list related to the use of Unkey in applications. Specifically, it adds a post by Rajeev Dewangan dated 27-October-2024, which discusses the integration of Hanko for authentication. The previous entry by Atharva Deshmukh remains unchanged, and the overall structure of the document is preserved. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@rajeevDewangan is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Details:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1)
25-26
: Consider simplifying the blog URL by removing tracking parameters.The blog entry is well-formatted and maintains chronological order. However, the blog URL contains several tracking parameters that aren't necessary for the documentation.
Consider simplifying the URL to:
-» 27-October-2024 by [Rajeev Dewangan](https://oss.gg/rajeevDewangan) Blog Link: [Blog](https://open.substack.com/pub/rajeevdewangan/p/integrating-hanko-for-authentication?r=4lly3x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true) +» 27-October-2024 by [Rajeev Dewangan](https://oss.gg/rajeevDewangan) Blog Link: [Blog](https://open.substack.com/pub/rajeevdewangan/p/integrating-hanko-for-authentication)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
oss.gg/8_use_unkey_blog.md (1)
25-26
: LGTM! Entry follows the required format.The new blog entry:
- Follows the specified schema
- Maintains chronological order
- Includes all required information (date, author, and blog link)
What does this PR do?
I wrote a technical blog on medium and published it. I've attached the link to blog post below.
Fixes #2581
Points
1500
Description
No response
Provide proof that you've completed the task
Link to my repo : https://github.com/rajeevDewangan/LawVisor
Link to Blog: https : https://open.substack.com/pub/rajeevdewangan/p/integrating-hanko-for-authentication?r=4lly3x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true