Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: "Read the docs button" on /ratelimits page was redirecting users to the home documentation page now after this fix it is redirecting users to specific Rate Limits documentation. #2635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

BadriVishalPadhy
Copy link
Contributor

@BadriVishalPadhy BadriVishalPadhy commented Nov 2, 2024

What does this PR do?

Read the docs button on /ratelimits page was redirecting users to the home documentation page now after this fix it is redirecting users to specific Rate Limits documentation.

Fixes #2396

If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • [ x] Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ x] Ran pnpm build
  • [ x] Ran pnpm fmt
  • [ x] Checked for warnings, there are none
  • [ x] Removed all console.logs
  • [ x] Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • [ x] My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated link in the Ratelimit Overview Page to direct users to more specific documentation on rate limiting.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced response format for the verifyKey operation, providing clearer validation codes for key management.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 2, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 30ed80a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 2, 2024 0:14am
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 2, 2024 0:14am
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 2, 2024 0:14am
workflows ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 2, 2024 0:14am
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 2, 2024 0:14am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 2, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the RatelimitOverviewPage component in apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/page.tsx. The href attribute of the Link component has been updated from /docs to /docs/ratelimiting/introduction, directing users to a more specific documentation page related to rate limiting. No other functional changes or adjustments were made.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/page.tsx Updated href attribute of Link from /docs to /docs/ratelimiting/introduction.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Redirect Read the Docs button to specific Rate Limits documentation (#2396)

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12a6def and 30ed80a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/page.tsx (1)

84-84: LGTM! The link now correctly points to the rate limiting documentation.

The change aligns perfectly with the PR objectives, fixing the redirection issue by pointing to the specific rate limiting documentation page instead of the general docs page.

Let's verify that the documentation path exists:

✅ Verification successful

Documentation path exists and is properly referenced across the codebase

The verification confirms that /docs/ratelimiting/introduction is a valid documentation path:

  • Found in apps/docs/mint.json configuration which defines the documentation structure
  • Referenced consistently across multiple blog posts and documentation files
  • The path follows the same pattern used in other documentation links
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the rate limiting documentation path exists
# Expected: Find references to this documentation path in the codebase

# Search for any references to this documentation path
rg -i "ratelimiting/introduction" 

# Additionally check if there are any other components linking to the same documentation
ast-grep --pattern 'Link href="/docs/ratelimiting/introduction"'

Length of output: 2046


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 2, 2024

@BadriVishalPadhy is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@BadriVishalPadhy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Cherry @notrab @edouardb @dca123 plz do check

@chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

chronark commented Nov 2, 2024

please don't ping random contributors

Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Awarding BadriVishalPadhy: 50 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/BadriVishalPadhy

@BadriVishalPadhy BadriVishalPadhy deleted the bug-fix branch November 3, 2024 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants