feat: dbfixture.New to accept IDB interface
#900
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hirasawayuki
force-pushed
the
enhance-idb-interface-support-dbfixture
branch
from
42d9515
to
71b2c90
Compare
hirasawayuki
changed the title
dbfixture.New to accept IDB interfacedbfixture.New to accept IDB interface
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses the limitation where the dbfixture.New function only accepts a pointer to
bun.DB. Bothbun.DBandbun.TXimplement theIDBinterface. By allowingdbfixture.Newto accept theIDBinterface, we provide more flexibility, especially during testing.close #899