Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Add new workflow for publish docs #2018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

dearchap
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

(REQUIRED)

  • documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

(REQUIRED)

New workflow to publish docs separately from test

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

(REQUIRED)

Special notes for your reviewer:

(fill-in or delete this section)

Testing

(fill-in or delete this section)

Release Notes

(REQUIRED)

Use new workflow for publishing docs

@dearchap dearchap requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 20:50
Copy link
Member

@Juneezee Juneezee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The latest publish job failed.

https://github.com/urfave/cli/actions/runs/12075203049/job/33674585639

go run scripts/build.go  deploy-mkdocs 
# ---> /usr/bin/git rev-parse --show-toplevel
# ---> /home/runner/.local/bin/mkdocs gh-deploy --force
Error: MkDocs encountered an error parsing the configuration file: while constructing a Python object
cannot find module 'material.extensions.emoji' (No module named 'material.extensions')
  in "/home/runner/work/cli/cli/mkdocs.yml", line 9[5](https://github.com/urfave/cli/actions/runs/12075203049/job/33674585639#step:5:6), column 20
exit status 1

I think the error is introduced in this commit adccc52?

@dearchap dearchap merged commit 5bb1617 into urfave:main Nov 29, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants