add a cache delete action #4
Conversation
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 97524b0 in 1 minute and 29 seconds
More details
- Looked at
149lines of code in4files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/main.ts:22
- Draft comment:
EnsureBLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKENis defined before using it in theAuthorizationheader to avoid sending requests with an empty token. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. rollup.config.js:13
- Draft comment:
Ensure that@actions/coreis installed as a dependency since it's marked as external and used at runtime. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Therollup.config.jsfile specifies@actions/coreas an external dependency, which is correct since it's a runtime dependency.
Workflow ID: wflow_dZeY5ioMV8fO6GFz
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
97524b0 to
aebdad4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on aebdad4 in 36 seconds
More details
- Looked at
150lines of code in4files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/main.ts:22
- Draft comment:
EnsureBLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKENis set in the environment variables to avoid authorization errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_HReECT8GQlkRg1Hz
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
aebdad4 to
02d4638
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 02d4638 in 32 seconds
More details
- Looked at
154lines of code in4files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_DEbREpIvtXve4C98
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
02d4638 to
e72e5ff
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on e72e5ff in 37 seconds
More details
- Looked at
177lines of code in5files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:12
- Draft comment:
The workflow is usingmkdir-action, which is not relevant to the new cache delete action. Update this to use the new action. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_xGolGO8gcwfjTGt9
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
e72e5ff to
20e89c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 20e89c0 in 41 seconds
More details
- Looked at
210lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:21
- Draft comment:
ThepackageManagerfield still listsyarn, but the workflow files have been updated to usenpm. Consider updating this field to reflect the change tonpm. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
Theruns-onvalue is set toblacksmith, which is not a standard GitHub runner. Ensure this is intentional and that the runner is correctly configured in your environment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thetest.yamlworkflow file has aruns-onvalue ofblacksmith, which is not a standard GitHub runner. This might be intentional, but it's worth noting in case it's an oversight.
Workflow ID: wflow_XLojdiZqXTfzExjW
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
20e89c0 to
829272e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 829272e in 52 seconds
More details
- Looked at
212lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
Theruns-on: blacksmithmight not be available in all environments. Ensure that the runner is properly configured and available. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. package.json:22
- Draft comment:
ThepackageManageris set toyarn@4.5.1, but the workflows usenpm. Consider updating for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_qwHLQt8s6ASSwxlv
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
829272e to
ed6e784
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on ed6e784 in 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
213lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
Theruns-onvalueblacksmithis not a standard GitHub runner. Ensure that this custom runner is correctly set up and available for use. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_oyrVMyQjr6YgX1mN
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
ed6e784 to
b016748
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on b016748 in 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
215lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
Ensure that theblacksmithrunner is correctly set up and available. If not, consider using a standard runner likeubuntu-latest. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_PCc6DHzxEceqPGFU
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
b016748 to
f0ea7bc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f0ea7bc in 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
218lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
The 'runs-on' directive has been changed to 'blacksmith', which might not be a standard runner. Ensure this is intentional and that the runner is correctly configured for the environment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. .github/workflows/build.yaml:21
- Draft comment:
Ensure that 'npm ci' is the correct command for installing dependencies in your CI environment, as it assumes a package-lock.json is present and up-to-date. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The PR description mentions switching from yarn to npm, but the test.yaml file still contains references to 'mkdir-action', which seems unrelated to the cache deletion functionality. This might be an oversight or leftover from previous configurations.
3. package.json:8
- Draft comment:
The 'test' script is missing from the package.json file. If testing is part of the CI/CD process, consider adding a test script. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, which is the removal of the 'test' script. However, the comment is speculative, as it suggests adding the script back only if testing is part of the CI/CD process. This does not indicate a definite issue that needs to be addressed.
The comment could be seen as informative rather than actionable, as it does not point out a definite problem but rather suggests a potential action based on an assumption.
The comment does not provide strong evidence of a necessary code change, as it is based on an assumption about the CI/CD process.
The comment should be deleted because it is speculative and does not point out a definite issue that requires a code change.
Workflow ID: wflow_gLY9jDNeukqu6jp3
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3805309 to
d189f84
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 3805309 in 52 seconds
More details
- Looked at
227lines of code in6files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:8
- Draft comment:
Thetestscript is missing in thescriptssection. Since the CI/CD workflow usesnpm test, consider adding a test script to thepackage.json. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the removal of the 'test' script. If the CI/CD workflow indeed relies on 'npm test', then the removal could break the workflow, making the comment valid. However, without more context on the CI/CD setup, it's speculative.
I might be missing the context of the CI/CD setup, which could mean the 'test' script is no longer needed. The comment assumes a dependency on 'npm test' without evidence.
The removal of the 'test' script is a change in the diff, and if the CI/CD workflow is known to use 'npm test', the comment is valid. However, without explicit evidence, it's speculative.
The comment is speculative without evidence of the CI/CD workflow's reliance on 'npm test'. It should be deleted unless there's strong evidence supporting the claim.
2. .github/workflows/test.yaml:12
- Draft comment:
Theuses: ./mkdir-actionstep seems unrelated to the current action's purpose of deleting caches. Ensure this step is relevant to the cache deletion functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
3. .github/workflows/build.yaml:32
- Draft comment:
Thetestscript is missing in thescriptssection ofpackage.json. Since this workflow usesnpm test, consider adding a test script to thepackage.json. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
4. action.yml:16
- Draft comment:
Thetestscript is missing in thescriptssection ofpackage.json. Since the CI/CD workflow usesnpm test, consider adding a test script to thepackage.json. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_QqdeBP2nJ4k0Gjsw
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on d189f84 in 43 seconds
More details
- Looked at
226lines of code in6files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:13
- Draft comment:
Consider settingsparse-checkout-cone-modeto true for more efficient sparse checkouts unless there's a specific reason not to. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thesparse-checkout-cone-modeis set to false in.github/workflows/test.yaml, which might not be necessary. Cone mode is generally more efficient and should be used unless there's a specific reason not to.
2. package.json:17
- Draft comment:
Consider removingtypescript-eslintfromdevDependenciesif it's not being used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thepackage.jsonfile still containstypescript-eslintindevDependencies, but there is no script or configuration indicating its use. It might be unnecessary.
Workflow ID: wflow_PEoCnNxm0KqBug1n
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
| logError(err); | ||
| process.exitCode = 1; | ||
| import { getInput, setFailed, info } from "@actions/core"; | ||
| import fetch from "node-fetch"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using the native fetch API available in Node.js 18 and later instead of node-fetch.
| import fetch from "node-fetch"; |
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
d189f84 to
cb5aa96
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cb5aa96 in 42 seconds
More details
- Looked at
230lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
The 'runs-on' value 'blacksmith' is not a standard GitHub runner. Ensure this is intended and configured correctly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. .github/workflows/build.yaml:20
- Draft comment:
Ensure that 'npm ci' is the correct command for installing dependencies, as it removes the existing node_modules folder and installs only the dependencies listed in package-lock.json. This is a change from 'yarn', so verify that this behavior is intended. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The PR description mentions switching from yarn to npm, but the test.yaml file still contains a reference to 'mkdir-action', which seems unrelated to the current action. This might be a leftover from previous configurations and should be updated or removed if not needed.
3. package.json:7
- Draft comment:
The 'test' script is missing from the package.json. If testing is required, consider adding a test script. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the removal of the 'test' script. However, the comment is speculative, suggesting adding a test script if testing is required, which is not a definite issue. The rules specify not to make speculative comments.
The comment might be useful if testing is a critical part of the project, but without context, it's speculative. The rules advise against speculative comments.
The rules are clear about not making speculative comments, and without strong evidence that the removal of the 'test' script is an issue, the comment should be deleted.
The comment is speculative and does not point out a definite issue, so it should be deleted.
4. src/main.ts:23
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the 'BLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKEN' environment variable is set and securely managed, as it is used for authorization. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_vA98Kh2dCjAl67mS
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
cb5aa96 to
f6f7b62
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on f6f7b62 in 43 seconds
More details
- Looked at
274lines of code in7files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:12
- Draft comment:
The step using./mkdir-actionseems unrelated to the cache deletion functionality. Consider removing or updating it to reflect the current action's purpose. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
2. package.json:6
- Draft comment:
Ensure the syntaxprettier --write --cache . !distcorrectly excludes thedistdirectory. Consider usingprettier --write --cache "**/*" "!dist/**"for better compatibility. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thepackage.jsonfile has aformatscript that excludes thedistdirectory, which is a common practice to avoid formatting built files. However, the syntax used might not work as intended with some shell environments.
Workflow ID: wflow_WZVgjfwND8eRwQl0
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
src/main.ts
Outdated
| method: "DELETE", | ||
| headers: { | ||
| Accept: "application/json; version=6.0-preview.1", | ||
| "X-Github-Repo-Name": process.env["GITHUB_REPO_NAME"] ?? "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a check to ensure BLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKEN is set before making the request. This will help in providing a clear error message if the token is missing.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
f6f7b62 to
334971f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 334971f in 50 seconds
More details
- Looked at
251lines of code in7files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yaml:10
- Draft comment:
Ensure thatruns-on: blacksmithis intentional, asblacksmithis not a standard GitHub runner. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Theruns-onfield in the test workflow has been changed toblacksmith, which is not a standard GitHub runner. This might be intentional, but it's worth noting in case it's an error.
2. package.json:3
- Draft comment:
Consider whether removing"type": "module"is intentional, as it affects module resolution and usage in Node.js. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thepackage.jsonfile has removed thetype: "module"field. This might affect how modules are imported and used, especially if ES modules were being used before.
Workflow ID: wflow_MCfFSx5nDHPNR6B5
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
| logError(err); | ||
| process.exitCode = 1; | ||
| import { getInput, setFailed, info } from "@actions/core"; | ||
| import fetch from "node-fetch"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using the native Fetch API available in Node.js 18 and later instead of node-fetch, as node-fetch is deprecated for these versions.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
334971f to
c1ffa8b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on c1ffa8b in 57 seconds
More details
- Looked at
270lines of code in7files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:6
- Draft comment:
Theformatscript uses an invalid exclusion pattern!dist. Consider using a.prettierignorefile to exclude thedistdirectory. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. action.yml:15
- Draft comment:
Theusingfield specifiesnode20, which is not a standard version. Consider usingnode16ornode18, which are supported by GitHub Actions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_H5aLYNY8yJiccXdu
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
| const baseUrl = | ||
| process.env.BLACKSMITH_CACHE_URL || | ||
| (process.env.PETNAME?.includes("staging") | ||
| ? "https://stagingapi.blacksmith.sh/cache" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider checking if the BLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKEN environment variable is set before making the request. If it's not set, you can fail early with a clear error message.
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
c1ffa8b to
4d5a61b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 4d5a61b in 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
270lines of code in7files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:11
- Draft comment:
node-fetchis deprecated. Consider removing it if you switch to the nativefetchAPI available in Node.js 18 and later. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
2. package.json:6
- Draft comment:
Ensure the exclusion syntax!distin theformatscript is correct for your setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thepackage.jsonfile has aformatscript that excludes thedistdirectory, which is good. However, ensure that the exclusion syntax is correct for your setup.
3. action.yml:15
- Draft comment:
node20supports the nativefetchAPI, consider using it instead ofnode-fetch. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_VZVBcHrnbxTDwFQW
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
| logError(err); | ||
| process.exitCode = 1; | ||
| import { getInput, setFailed, info } from "@actions/core"; | ||
| import fetch from "node-fetch"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
node-fetch is deprecated. Consider using the native fetch API available in Node.js 18 and later.
| import fetch from "node-fetch"; |
aayushshah15
force-pushed
the
11-24-add_a_cache_delete_action
branch
from
4d5a61b to
aeea819
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on aeea819 in 46 seconds
More details
- Looked at
270lines of code in7files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:6
- Draft comment:
Theformatscript should exclude thedistdirectory correctly. Consider using a.prettierignorefile to specify ignored paths. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
Thepackage.jsonfile has aformatscript that uses Prettier with a--cacheoption. However, the!distpattern is incorrect for excluding thedistdirectory. The correct way to exclude a directory in Prettier is to use the--ignore-pathoption with a.prettierignorefile.
2. .github/workflows/build.yaml:26
- Draft comment:
Consider usinggit diff --exit-codeinstead ofgit diff && git diff-index --quiet --exit-code HEADfor a more reliable check for changes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
In thebuild.yamlfile, thegit diffcommand is used to check for changes after formatting and building. However, this command will not work as expected if there are untracked files. Usinggit diff --exit-codeis more reliable for checking if there are any changes.
Workflow ID: wflow_Su7KlpntCpKJNGMO
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 4 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
| headers: { | ||
| Accept: "application/json; version=6.0-preview.1", | ||
| "X-GitHub-Repo-Name": process.env["GITHUB_REPO_NAME"] ?? "", | ||
| Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env["BLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKEN"]}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider checking if process.env["BLACKSMITH_CACHE_TOKEN"] is set before making the request. If not, set a failed status with a clear error message.
Important
Adds a GitHub Action to delete Blacksmith caches, updates dependencies, and switches CI/CD workflows from yarn to npm.
action.ymlto delete Blacksmith caches usingkeyand optionalversioninputs.src/main.ts, handling success, cache not found, and errors.@actions/coreandnode-fetchtodependenciesinpackage.json.devDependencieswith@vercel/ncc,@types/node,@types/node-fetch, andtypescript.rollupwithnccinpackage.jsonbuild script.yarnwithnpminbuild.yamlworkflow.This description was created by
for aeea819. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.