Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metaschema unittesting oct2020 #88

Conversation

wendellpiez
Copy link
Collaborator

Committer Notes

Includes XSpec unit testing for Metaschema composition and XSD development.

Creating the PR so as to see any conflicts.

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change? Investigating this
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all website](https://pages.nist.gov/metaschema) and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the website can be made in the website/content directory of your branch.

david-waltermire and others added 30 commits September 17, 2020 23:16
…tions to catalog metaschema (omitted flags are restored)
wendellpiez and others added 27 commits November 10, 2020 14:26
… Also, notes towards supporting the JSON side.
…initions are exported to other metaschemas that import a given metaschema.

Added uniqueness constraints for constraint definitions.
Added a key/keyref constraint for index and index-has-key.
* Refactored metadata metaschema to use new metaschema features and to add constraints.
* updated to latest metaschemas published in master as of commit 53e3c8377a2043d33ec91efdf06d934ca642f4e7
* moved OSCAL metaschema to the OSCAL repo
…matron checks (validating integrity of standalone modules)
… declared to be 'local' at top level (usnistgov#76); now with unit testing
@wendellpiez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

According to #81 this work was merged into metaschema-m4-integration so deleting this PR (along with the branch behind it).

@wendellpiez wendellpiez deleted the metaschema-unittesting-oct2020 branch November 10, 2020 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants