-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
GNU/CI: use the aggregated-result.json files and move to python #7471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
I think it needs more work:
|
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
a6bf62e to
cc25ca9
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
and it works: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Much easier to read than the bash code :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn't it ? :)
Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <daniel.hofstetter@42dh.com>
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <daniel.hofstetter@42dh.com>
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
…ls#7471) * GNU/CI: use the aggregated-result.json files and move to python Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <daniel.hofstetter@42dh.com> * simplify code Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <daniel.hofstetter@42dh.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <daniel.hofstetter@42dh.com>
No description provided.