-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
fallible offset conversion #145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
sylvestre
merged 1 commit into
uutils:main
from
yuankunzhang:fallible-offset-conversion
May 26, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In another PR I had the fuzzer fail on "m1y-12".
Maybe worth adding?
assert!(parse_datetime("m1y-12").is_ok());
(-12 is an acceptable offset)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I misunderstand something, but shouldn't it be:
and
With GNU
date
I get:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Goodness....
So I have no idea what
m1y
is supposed to parse to ,-P But it seems like we accept it, while GNU coreutils always rejects it. So I think this is orthogonal to the problem here. So maybe let's drop my suggestion. Filed #147.BUT, GNU coreutils accepts all offsets between -24 and +24, so we should do that too:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are using
chrono::FixedOffset
to represent offsets, which accepts offsets only in the range -24 to +24. Note that the literalm+12
will overflow because the letterm
already denotes a +12 offset. Achieving GNU date compatibility in this regard will require re-working the underlining data models. Since this PR is just a trivial fix, I suggest we merge it first and address the larger redesign in a separate effort.