Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance: combine scheduling logic for practice quizzes into publication logic #4374

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: v3
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sjschlapbach
Copy link
Member

@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach commented Nov 13, 2024

Screenshot 2024-11-13 at 18 53 21

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added the courseStartDate property to enhance quiz context across various components.
    • Introduced the PracticeQuizPublishingModal for improved quiz publication management, including immediate and scheduled options.
    • Enhanced quiz scheduling and publication workflows in the Cypress end-to-end tests.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined the publication process by refining the handling of availability dates.
  • Documentation

    • Updated localization strings for clarity regarding scheduling and start date requirements for practice quizzes.
  • Chores

    • Removed outdated references and streamlined imports in several components for better performance.

Copy link

aviator-app bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This pull request is currently open (not queued).

How to merge

To merge this PR, comment /aviator merge or add the mergequeue label.


See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new property, courseStartDate, across multiple components related to practice quizzes, enhancing their functionality by providing context about the course's start date. Key components affected include PracticeQuizElement, PracticeQuizList, and PublishPracticeQuizButton, which now accept and utilize this new prop. Additionally, several GraphQL mutations have been updated to reflect changes in how quizzes are created, edited, and published, particularly regarding the handling of availability dates.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/PracticeQuizElement.tsx Added courseStartDate to PracticeQuizElementProps and updated component usage.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/PracticeQuizList.tsx Added courseStartDate to PracticeQuizTileProps and updated component props accordingly.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/actions/PublishPracticeQuizButton.tsx Updated props to include courseStartDate and modified internal logic and imports.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PracticeQuizPublishingModal.tsx New component added for managing quiz publication with courseStartDate prop.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PublishConfirmationModal.tsx Removed PracticeQuiz type references and simplified mutation handling.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/CourseSelectionMonitorPracticeQuiz.tsx Removed availableFrom from state management logic while retaining course date settings.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/WizardLayout.tsx Removed optional availableFrom property from PracticeQuizFormValues interface.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/practiceQuiz/PracticeQuizSettingsStep.tsx Updated availability section layout and messaging to reflect scheduling changes.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/practiceQuiz/PracticeQuizWizard.tsx Removed availableFrom validation from settings step and simplified state management.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/practiceQuiz/submitPracticeQuizForm.ts Removed dayjs import and related formatting for availableFrom.
apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/courses/[id].tsx Updated PracticeQuizList, GroupActivityList, and MicroLearningList to accept courseStartDate.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MCreatePracticeQuiz.graphql Removed $availableFrom parameter from CreatePracticeQuiz mutation.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MEditPracticeQuiz.graphql Removed $availableFrom parameter from EditPracticeQuiz mutation.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MPublishPracticeQuiz.graphql Added optional $availableFrom parameter to PublishPracticeQuiz mutation.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json Updated GraphQL schema to reflect new types and fields related to practice quizzes.
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json Updated hash values for CreatePracticeQuiz, EditPracticeQuiz, and PublishPracticeQuiz.
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql Updated mutation signatures for createPracticeQuiz, editPracticeQuiz, and publishPracticeQuiz.
packages/graphql/src/public/server.json Updated mutation signatures and added new fragments related to practice quizzes.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts Modified Mutation type to include new fields and adjust existing ones for practice quizzes.
packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts Updated functions to handle availableFrom for quiz scheduling and publication.
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts Updated German localization strings related to practice quizzes and group activities.
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts Updated English localization strings, removing and adding messages for clarity.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • rschlaefli

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sjschlapbach has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fa9c1c and 478801d.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/PracticeQuizList.tsx (1)

12-12: Consider using Date type for courseStartDate

Using a string type for dates can lead to inconsistencies in date handling and validation. Consider using the Date type for better type safety and date manipulation capabilities.

-  courseStartDate: string
+  courseStartDate: Date
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/actions/PublishPracticeQuizButton.tsx (1)

11-15: Consider using a more specific type for courseStartDate

While the type narrowing for practiceQuiz using Pick is excellent, the courseStartDate type could be more specific to ensure date format consistency.

Consider using a more specific type:

-  courseStartDate: string
+  courseStartDate: `${number}-${number}-${number}` // YYYY-MM-DD format

Or add runtime validation:

function isValidDateFormat(date: string): boolean {
  return /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/.test(date) && !isNaN(Date.parse(date))
}
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PublishConfirmationModal.tsx (2)

Line range hint 54-61: Consider adding error handling.

While the logic is correct, consider adding error handling to catch and process potential mutation failures gracefully.

 onClick={async () => {
+  try {
     if (elementType === ElementInstanceType.Microlearning) {
       await publishMicroLearning()
     } else if (elementType === ElementInstanceType.GroupActivity) {
       await publishGroupActivity()
     }
     setOpen(false)
+  } catch (error) {
+    // Handle error (e.g., show error message)
+    console.error('Failed to publish:', error)
+  }
 }}

Line range hint 1-99: Consider enhancing modal reusability.

The modal component could be made more reusable by:

  1. Extracting the mutation logic into a custom hook
  2. Using a strategy pattern for different element types
  3. Making the modal more generic with pluggable actions

This would make it easier to add support for new element types in the future without modifying the modal component itself.

apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PracticeQuizPublishingModal.tsx (1)

32-32: Address the TODO comment for translations.

The comment indicates that translations are missing for the component's content.

Would you like me to help generate the translation keys and their corresponding English values for this component?

apps/frontend-manage/src/components/sessions/creation/practiceQuiz/PracticeQuizSettingsStep.tsx (1)

163-170: Enhance accessibility and user guidance

While the warning message about moved scheduling functionality is well-implemented, consider these improvements:

  1. Add ARIA attributes for better accessibility
  2. Provide more specific guidance about where to find the scheduling functionality

Consider applying these changes:

 <div className="flex flex-row items-center gap-4">
   <FontAwesomeIcon
     icon={faWarning}
     className="text-orange-500"
+    aria-hidden="true"
   />
-  <div className="mt-1 text-sm">
+  <div className="mt-1 text-sm" role="alert" aria-live="polite">
     {t('manage.sessionForms.practiceQuizSchedulingMoved')}
   </div>
 </div>

Also, consider updating the translation key 'manage.sessionForms.practiceQuizSchedulingMoved' to include information about where users can now find the scheduling functionality (e.g., in the publication flow).

apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/courses/[id].tsx (1)

Line range hint 248-275: Consider standardizing date prop handling across components

To improve maintainability and consistency, consider:

  1. Creating a common interface for date-related props
  2. Documenting the expected date format and timezone handling
  3. Adding prop-types or TypeScript interfaces to enforce consistent usage

This will help ensure consistent behavior across all components that handle course dates.

packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (1)

1028-1029: LGTM! Added optional availableFrom parameter to publishPracticeQuiz.

The addition of an optional availableFrom parameter to the publication mutation provides flexibility in scheduling:

  • Immediate publication when availableFrom is not provided
  • Scheduled publication when a future date is provided

This change follows the principle of separation of concerns by:

  1. Separating content management (create/edit) from publication workflow
  2. Consolidating scheduling logic into the publication phase
  3. Providing a more intuitive API where availability is determined during publication
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)

15067-15069: Add description for the availableFrom parameter.

Consider adding a description to document the parameter's purpose and behavior, especially since this is part of a significant change in how scheduling works.

 {
   "name": "availableFrom",
-  "description": null,
+  "description": "Optional date when the practice quiz should become available. If not provided, the quiz will be available immediately upon publication.",
   "type": {
packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts (1)

2989-2996: Simplify the availableFrom parameter type

Since availableFrom is optional and can be omitted, you can simplify its type by removing | null, changing it to availableFrom?: Date. This avoids allowing null when it's not necessary.

Apply this diff to simplify the parameter type:

 export async function publishPracticeQuiz(
   {
     id,
     availableFrom,
   }: {
     id: string
-    availableFrom?: Date | null
+    availableFrom?: Date
   },
   ctx: ContextWithUser
 ) {
🛑 Comments failed to post (4)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PracticeQuizPublishingModal.tsx (2)

46-53: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Move hard-coded strings to translation keys.

Several UI strings are hard-coded in English. These should be moved to translation keys for internationalization support:

  • "Publish Immediately"
  • The entire explanation text about immediate publication
  • "Confirm Publication"

Example refactor:

-<H3 className={{ root: 'mb-0' }}>Publish Immediately</H3>
+<H3 className={{ root: 'mb-0' }}>{t('practiceQuiz.publishImmediately')}</H3>

Also applies to: 73-73


80-88: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Move remaining hard-coded strings to translation keys.

Additional strings that need translation:

  • "Schedule Publication"
  • The explanation text about scheduled publication
  • "Confirm Scheduling"

Also applies to: 140-140

packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)

1166-1167: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in the translation key name.

The key name contains a typo: practiceQuizStartReqeuired should be practiceQuizStartRequired.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-      practiceQuizStartReqeuired:
+      practiceQuizStartRequired:
        'Please choose the start date of the practice quiz.',
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      practiceQuizStartRequired:
        'Please choose the start date of the practice quiz.',
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (1)

1172-1173: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in translation key name.

The key name contains a typo: practiceQuizStartReqeuired should be practiceQuizStartRequired.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-      practiceQuizStartReqeuired:
+      practiceQuizStartRequired:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      practiceQuizStartRequired:
        'Bitte geben Sie ein Startdatum für Ihr Übungs-Quiz ein.',

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PracticeQuizPublishingModal.tsx (2)

21-31: Consider adding error handling for the mutation.

While the mutation setup is good, consider adding error handling to provide feedback to users when publication fails.

 const [publishPracticeQuiz, { loading: practiceQuizPublishing }] =
-    useMutation(PublishPracticeQuizDocument)
+    useMutation(PublishPracticeQuizDocument, {
+      onError: (error) => {
+        // Handle error appropriately (e.g., show toast notification)
+        console.error('Failed to publish practice quiz:', error)
+      },
+    })

21-143: Consider component decomposition and hook extraction.

The component handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from:

  1. Splitting into smaller components (ImmediatePublication and ScheduledPublication)
  2. Moving the mutation logic to a custom hook (e.g., usePublishPracticeQuiz)

This would improve maintainability and reusability.

🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/courses/modals/PracticeQuizPublishingModal.tsx (2)

98-98: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in validation message key.

There's a typo in the validation message key: 'practiceQuizStartReqeuired' should be 'practiceQuizStartRequired'.

-  .required(t('manage.sessionForms.practiceQuizStartReqeuired'))
+  .required(t('manage.sessionForms.practiceQuizStartRequired'))
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

                .required(t('manage.sessionForms.practiceQuizStartRequired'))

32-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider handling the mutation response.

The immediate publication button should handle the mutation response to confirm successful publication.

 onClick={async () => {
-  await publishPracticeQuiz({
-    variables: {
-      id: elementId,
-    },
-  })
-  setOpen(false)
+  try {
+    const response = await publishPracticeQuiz({
+      variables: {
+        id: elementId,
+      },
+    })
+    if (response.data?.publishPracticeQuiz) {
+      // Show success notification
+      setOpen(false)
+    }
+  } catch (error) {
+    // Error already handled by mutation error handler
+  }
 }}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (1)

1172-1173: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in key name.

There's a typo in the key name practiceQuizStartReqeuired (misspelled "Required").

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-      practiceQuizStartReqeuired:
+      practiceQuizStartRequired:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      practiceQuizStartRequired:
        'Bitte geben Sie ein Startdatum für Ihr Übungs-Quiz ein.',

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cypress/cypress/e2e/I-bookmarking-workflow.cy.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-276: Consider these improvements for better test reliability and maintainability

  1. Replace hardcoded wait times with proper Cypress wait commands:
-cy.wait(500)
+cy.waitUntil(() => cy.get('[data-cy="element-state"]').should('have.class', 'updated'))
  1. Extract common cleanup logic into a custom command:
// In commands.ts
Cypress.Commands.add('cleanupActivity', (type, name, courseName) => {
  cy.get('[data-cy="courses"]').click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="course-list-button-${courseName}"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="tab-${type}s"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="${type}-actions-${name}"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="delete-${type}-${name}"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="confirm-deletion-responses"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="activity-confirmation-modal-confirm"]`).click()
  cy.get(`[data-cy="${type}-actions-${name}"]`).should('not.exist')
})
  1. Consider using before/after hooks for setup and cleanup to improve test organization
cypress/cypress/e2e/H-practice-quiz-workflow.cy.ts (2)

638-654: Enhance test assertions for better clarity.

While the test covers both invalid and valid scheduling scenarios, it could be more explicit in its assertions.

Consider adding explicit assertions to verify why the button is disabled:

 cy.get('[data-cy="schedule-practice-quiz-publication"]').should(
   'be.disabled'
 )
+cy.get('[data-cy="schedule-error-message"]').should(
+  'contain',
+  'Publication date cannot be before course start date'
+)

686-689: Consider adding additional assertions for immediate publication.

The test verifies basic functionality but could benefit from additional assertions to ensure the publication state is correct.

Consider adding these assertions:

 cy.get('[data-cy="schedule-practice-quiz-publication"]').click()
+// Verify immediate publication state
+cy.get('[data-cy="publication-status"]').should('contain', 'Published immediately')
+cy.get('[data-cy="publication-date"]').should('contain', `${currentYear - 1}-01-01`)
 cy.get(`[data-cy="practice-quiz-${scheduledName}"]`).contains(
   messages.shared.generic.published
 )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fa9c1c and 478801d.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • cypress/cypress/e2e/H-practice-quiz-workflow.cy.ts (4 hunks)
  • cypress/cypress/e2e/I-bookmarking-workflow.cy.ts (1 hunks)
  • cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/i18n/messages/en.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cypress/cypress/e2e/I-bookmarking-workflow.cy.ts (1)

84-84: LGTM: Publishing workflow update aligns with PR objectives

The change from a confirmation-based to an immediate publication workflow is consistent with the PR's goal of combining scheduling logic into publication logic.

Let's verify that we're testing all aspects of the new publishing workflow:

✅ Verification successful

Publishing workflow update is consistently implemented

The change from confirmation-based to immediate publication is consistently implemented across both test files:

  • I-bookmarking-workflow.cy.ts
  • H-practice-quiz-workflow.cy.ts

Both files use the same data-cy selector publish-practice-quiz-immediately for the new immediate publication workflow, and both have comprehensive test coverage for the publishing scenarios including:

  • Immediate publication
  • Scheduled publication
  • Publication state verification
  • Student visibility verification
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other test files that might need similar updates for the publishing workflow

# Search for other test files that might contain practice quiz publishing tests
fd -e cy.ts -e cy.js | xargs rg -l "publish.*practice.*quiz"

# Search for the specific data-cy attribute to ensure consistent usage
rg "data-cy=\"publish-practice-quiz-immediately\""

Length of output: 449


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the practice quiz workflow test file to ensure consistent publishing behavior
cat "cypress/cypress/e2e/H-practice-quiz-workflow.cy.ts"

Length of output: 26928

cypress/cypress/e2e/H-practice-quiz-workflow.cy.ts (2)

394-394: LGTM! Test name accurately reflects the purpose.

The renamed test case better describes its intention of testing the scheduling functionality.


494-494: LGTM! Selector name is more descriptive.

The new data-cy selector 'publish-practice-quiz-immediately' better describes the specific action being tested.

packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)

1168-1169: LGTM: Clear messaging for practice quiz scheduling changes.

The new strings effectively communicate:

  1. The relocation of scheduling functionality
  2. The requirement for specifying a start date

Also applies to: 1172-1173


1755-1762: LGTM: Comprehensive publishing workflow messages.

The new strings provide clear guidance through the publishing workflow:

  1. Immediate publishing option with explanation
  2. Scheduled publishing option with explanation
  3. Confirmation steps for both workflows

Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 13, 2024

klicker-uzh    Run #3672

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #3672  •  git commit 997be50acf ℹ️: Merge 478801d0b48e4d626a5c587ab680e4ce05d228a8 into 349ce8ae1b11106c0ec037b4485f...
Project klicker-uzh
Branch Review enhanced-pq-scheduling
Run status status check passed Passed #3672
Run duration 11m 25s
Commit git commit 997be50acf ℹ️: Merge 478801d0b48e4d626a5c587ab680e4ce05d228a8 into 349ce8ae1b11106c0ec037b4485f...
Committer Julius Schlapbach
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 140
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant