enhance: implement element instance structure and frontend for selection questions #4440
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sjschlapbach has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new element type called Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (2)
5-81: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The implementation of
ANSWER_COLLECTIONSis well-structured with consistent formatting and appropriate access levels. Each collection has unique entries and properly documents markdown support.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the structure and purpose of the constant:
/** * Test answer collections with different access levels. * Each collection contains a set of entries and supports markdown in descriptions. */ export const ANSWER_COLLECTIONS = [
Line range hint
253-270: Consider using numbers for numerical solutions.While the implementation is functionally correct, storing numerical solutions as strings may lead to type-safety issues and unnecessary string-to-number conversions.
Consider this improvement:
- exactSolutions: ['0', '20', '100'], + exactSolutions: [0, 20, 100],apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/liveQuiz/LiveQuizQuestionsStep.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-22: Review and update the TODO commentThe TODO comment about updating accepted types seems outdated since we're now adding new types. Consider either:
- Removing the comment if it's no longer relevant
- Updating it to reflect current requirements for flashcards and content elements
apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/quizzes/index.tsx (1)
53-54: Remove debugging console.log statementRemove the console.log statement as it appears to be debugging code that shouldn't be in production.
-console.log(data)packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts (1)
245-252: LGTM! Consider extracting common query options.The include clause correctly retrieves all necessary data for selection questions. However, since this query structure is identical to the one in
microLearning.ts, consider extracting it into a shared constant or helper function to maintain DRY principles.Example refactor:
// In a shared utils file export const ELEMENT_QUERY_INCLUDE = { answerCollection: { include: { entries: true, }, }, answerCollectionSolutions: true, } as const; // In the services const dbElements = await ctx.prisma.element.findMany({ where: { ... }, include: ELEMENT_QUERY_INCLUDE, });packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (1)
1569-1574: Consider adding input validation for numberOfInputs.While the structure is good, consider adding a restriction on
numberOfInputsto prevent potential performance issues with very large numbers.Consider adding these constraints:
- Add a maximum limit for
numberOfInputs- Consider making it required (non-nullable)
- Add a minimum value of 1
Example modification:
type SelectionQuestionOptions { answerCollection: SelectionQuestionOptionsCollection answerCollectionSolutionIds: [Int!] hasSampleSolution: Boolean numberOfInputs: Int! # Make required maxNumberOfInputs: Int # Add max limit }Also applies to: 1576-1584
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
23525-23658: LGTM: Well-structured element type with flexible scoringThe SelectionElementData type is well-designed with appropriate field types and nullability constraints. The inclusion of pointsMultiplier enables flexible scoring strategies.
Consider documenting the scoring formula and valid ranges for pointsMultiplier to ensure consistent implementation across the frontend and backend. This will be particularly important for:
- Partial scoring in multi-select scenarios
- Score normalization across different question types
- Integration with existing scoring systems
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/groupActivity/GroupActivityWizard.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/liveQuiz/LiveQuizQuestionsStep.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/microLearning/MicroLearningWizard.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/practiceQuiz/PracticeQuizWizard.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/questions/manipulation/ElementTypeMonitor.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/questions/manipulation/useElementFormInitialValues.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/quizzes/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementData.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementDataInfo.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementDataWithoutSolutions.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MManipulateSelectionQuestion.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetSingleQuestion.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/client.json(7 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(2 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts(5 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts(4 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts(5 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts(4 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/seedTEST.ts(6 hunks)packages/types/src/index.ts(5 hunks)packages/util/src/index.ts(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/util/src/index.ts
[error] 177-177: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
- GitHub Check: SonarCloud
- GitHub Check: check
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (41)
packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (2)
318-322: LGTM! Question arrays updated consistently.The new questions (5 and 6) have been properly integrated into the quiz blocks while maintaining the existing structure.
Also applies to: 338-342
271-283:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the numberOfInputs setting.
There's a potential mismatch between configuration and solutions:
numberOfInputsis set to 2answerCollectionSolutionscontains 3 items:['Apple', 'Banana', 'Cherry']This might prevent users from selecting all correct answers.
Either adjust
numberOfInputsto match the number of correct answers or reduce the number of correct answers:options: { hasSampleSolution: true, - numberOfInputs: 2, + numberOfInputs: 3, },✅ Verification successful
The numberOfInputs setting is working as designed.
The mismatch between
numberOfInputs: 2and three correct answers inanswerCollectionSolutionsis intentional:
numberOfInputslimits how many selections a user can makeanswerCollectionSolutionsdefines the pool of correct answers- Users can select any subset of correct answers up to the numberOfInputs limit
This design allows for flexible question configurations where users can select some, but not necessarily all, correct answers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other SELECTION type questions rg "type: ElementType\.SELECTION" -B 5 -A 10 # Look for type definitions related to SELECTION rg "interface.*Selection|type.*Selection" -A 5 # Search for test files related to SELECTION questions fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg "SELECTION.*test|test.*SELECTION"Length of output: 74803
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation about SELECTION type fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -i "selection.*question|number.*input" # Look for test files related to SELECTION type validation fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg "SELECTION.*test|test.*SELECTION|numberOfInputs" # Search for implementation code handling numberOfInputs validation ast-grep --pattern 'numberOfInputs = $_' rg "numberOfInputs.*validation|validate.*numberOfInputs"Length of output: 2347
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for GraphQL resolvers and service layer code handling SELECTION rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "type: ElementType.SELECTION" -B 5 -A 10 # Look for frontend validation or handling of numberOfInputs rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" "numberOfInputs.*\{|numberOfInputs.*\(" -B 5 -A 10 # Search for any validation middleware or service functions rg "validate.*options|options.*validate" -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" -B 5 -A 10Length of output: 66848
packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts (1)
143-151: LGTM!The modifications to the
prepareQuestionfunction appropriately handle the new parameters for answer collections and correct option IDs. The adjustments enhance the function's capability to prepare different types of questions.Also applies to: 164-165
packages/prisma/src/data/seedTEST.ts (4)
137-139: LGTM!Including the
entriesin theanswerCollectionsupsert operation ensures that the associated entries are readily available for subsequent processing.
204-253: LGTM!The additional logic in seeding questions with answer collections and correct option IDs is well-implemented. Error handling is thorough, and the mapping between collections and their entries is correctly established.
906-912: LGTM!Extracting the IDs of correct answer options for the selection question is correctly handled. This ensures accurate responses are captured for selection elements.
Line range hint
950-1000: LGTM!The addition of handling for
SELECTIONelement types in decision mappings is appropriate. This extends support for the new element type in group activity decisions.Also applies to: 1041-1045
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/questions/manipulation/ElementTypeMonitor.tsx (1)
26-27: LGTM! Clean implementation of Selection element type handlingThe addition follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with other element type handlers.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/liveQuiz/LiveQuizQuestionsStep.tsx (1)
23-23: LGTM! Selection type properly added to accepted typesThe addition of ElementType.Selection expands the quiz creation capabilities as intended.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/questions/manipulation/useElementFormInitialValues.ts (1)
136-138: LGTM! Robust handling of answerCollectionThe implementation properly handles the case when answerCollection is undefined and follows TypeScript best practices with optional chaining.
packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts (5)
150-163: LGTM! Well-structured interface for selection options.The interface and implementation are clear and follow the established patterns.
165-180: LGTM! Well-structured collection interface.The collection interface and implementation are clear and correctly reference the entry type.
185-185: LGTM! Good replacement of ID with object reference.The change from
answerCollectionIdtoanswerCollectionobject improves type safety while maintaining backward compatibility with nullable flag.Also applies to: 196-199
271-281: LGTM! Well-structured element data interface.The interface correctly extends BaseElementData and reuses shared element data implementation.
308-308: LGTM! Proper integration with ElementData union.The SelectionElementData type is correctly added to the union and resolver.
Also applies to: 320-321
packages/types/src/index.ts (2)
195-201: LGTM! Well-aligned with GraphQL schema.The TypeScript interface correctly mirrors the GraphQL schema structure.
303-306: LGTM! Consistent with other result types.The structure follows the established pattern and is suitable for aggregating selection counts.
packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts (1)
242-249: LGTM! Proper inclusion of answer collection data.The include clause correctly retrieves all necessary data for selection questions.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/practiceQuiz/PracticeQuizWizard.tsx (1)
53-53: LGTM! Addition of Selection typeThe addition of
ElementType.Selectionto the accepted types array correctly enables support for selection questions in practice quizzes.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/microLearning/MicroLearningWizard.tsx (1)
52-52: LGTM! Addition of Selection typeThe addition of
ElementType.Selectionto the accepted types array correctly enables support for selection questions in micro-learning activities.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/activities/creation/groupActivity/GroupActivityWizard.tsx (1)
55-55: LGTM! Addition of Selection typeThe addition of
ElementType.Selectionto the accepted types array correctly enables support for selection questions in group activities.packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts (4)
124-127: LGTM! Consistent answer collection structureThe answer collection is correctly structured with an id and empty entries array, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
145-152: LGTM! Proper Prisma include patternThe Prisma query correctly includes the answer collection and its entries, following established patterns for eager loading related data.
639-644: LGTM! Consistent include patternThe include pattern for answer collection and entries matches the pattern used in getArtificialElementInstance, maintaining consistency.
402-405: LGTM! Consistent return structureThe answer collection structure in the return object matches the pattern used in getSingleQuestion, ensuring consistency across the service.
packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts (2)
324-331: LGTM! Include clause enhanced for selection questions.The addition of
answerCollectionandanswerCollectionSolutionsto theincludeclause ensures that the necessary data for selection questions is fetched when retrieving elements.
1615-1623: LGTM! Include clause enhanced for selection questions in element instances.The addition of
elementwithanswerCollectionto theincludeclause ensures that answer collections are properly fetched when retrieving element instances during quiz cancellation.packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts (1)
1003-1010: LGTM! Include clause enhanced for selection questions.The addition of
answerCollectionandanswerCollectionSolutionsto theincludeclause ensures that the necessary data for selection questions is fetched when retrieving elements.packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2)
1146-1146: LGTM! Documentation updated for selection questions in live quizzes.The list of supported question types has been updated to include selection questions, maintaining consistency with the new feature.
1271-1271: LGTM! Documentation updated for selection questions in group activities.The list of supported question types has been updated to include selection questions, maintaining consistency with the new feature.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MManipulateSelectionQuestion.graphql (1)
33-35: LGTM! Improved structure for answer collection data.The restructuring of
answerCollectionas an object with anidfield follows GraphQL best practices by providing a more organized and extensible data structure.packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementDataInfo.graphql (1)
36-46: LGTM! SelectionElementData fragment follows established patterns.The new fragment for SelectionElementData maintains consistency with other element types by including all standard fields (id, name, type, content, etc.).
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementDataWithoutSolutions.graphql (1)
57-77: LGTM! Comprehensive data structure for selection elements.The SelectionElementData fragment provides a well-structured representation of selection elements, including a properly nested answerCollection with entries containing both id and value fields.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/FElementData.graphql (1)
68-89: LGTM! Fragment structure follows established patterns.The SelectionElementData fragment is well-structured and consistent with other element types, properly including all necessary fields for selection questions.
Run this script to verify type consistency across element fragments:
✅ Verification successful
SelectionElementData fragment structure verified as consistent
The fragment follows the established pattern across all element types:
- Contains all required base fields (__typename, id, elementId, etc.)
- Options structure aligns with other question types
- Solution handling matches the pattern used in other elements
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all element data fragments follow consistent patterns # Test: Check for required fields across all element data fragments ast-grep --pattern $'... on $_ElementData { __typename id elementId name type content explanation pointsMultiplier $$$ }'Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all element data fragments in .graphql files echo "=== Element Data Fragments ===" rg -U "fragment.*on.*ElementData \{[\s\S]*?\}" --type graphql echo -e "\n=== Element Type Implementations ===" rg -U "... on \w+ElementData \{[\s\S]*?\}" --type graphqlLength of output: 347
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find .graphql files and search for element data fragments echo "=== GraphQL Files ===" fd -e graphql echo -e "\n=== Element Data Fragments ===" fd -e graphql -x rg -U "... on \w+ElementData \{(\n.*)*?\}"Length of output: 17244
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetSingleQuestion.graphql (1)
106-108: LGTM! Nested structure improves data access pattern.The change from a direct ID to a nested object with
idfield follows GraphQL best practices by allowing future expansion of theanswerCollectionobject without breaking changes.packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (1)
21-22: Operation hashes updated correctly.The hash updates reflect the schema changes for selection questions across create, edit, and query operations.
Run this script to verify operation hash consistency:
Also applies to: 25-25, 43-45, 124-124, 126-126, 128-128, 132-132, 139-139, 144-145, 156-156, 161-161, 170-173
✅ Verification successful
Hash updates correctly reflect schema changes
The hash updates in client.json are valid as the operations depend on element fragments that include selection question fields. Both CreateLiveQuiz and CreateMicroLearning operations reference these fragments (ElementDataInfo and ElementData respectively) which must have been updated to accommodate selection question changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that operation hashes match their queries # Test: Check for any operations missing hash updates # Look for GraphQL operations that might reference selection questions rg -l "SelectionElement|SelectionElementData" --type graphql # Compare with updated hashes for op in $(rg -o '"([^"]+)":' client.json | cut -d'"' -f2); do echo "Checking $op..." rg "query $op|mutation $op|subscription $op|fragment $op" --type graphql doneLength of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First verify client.json exists and show sample content echo "Checking client.json..." cat packages/graphql/src/public/client.json | head -n 5 # Find all .graphql and .gql files echo -e "\nFinding GraphQL files..." fd "\.(graphql|gql)$" # Search for selection-related types in found files echo -e "\nSearching for selection types..." rg "SelectionElement|SelectionElementData" -lLength of output: 14747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of relevant GraphQL operations echo "Checking CreateLiveQuiz operation..." cat packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MCreateLiveQuiz.graphql echo -e "\nChecking CreateMicroLearning operation..." cat packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MCreateMicroLearning.graphql echo -e "\nChecking selection question manipulation..." cat packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MManipulateSelectionQuestion.graphqlLength of output: 3099
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (1)
1558-1567: LGTM! SelectionElementData follows established patterns.The type definition is consistent with other element data types and includes all necessary fields.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (2)
4885-4889: LGTM: Type registration follows schema conventionsThe SelectionElementData type is properly registered in the possible types array, maintaining alphabetical ordering.
Line range hint
23660-23822: Verify completeness of selection options structureThe options collection structure is missing several important fields that might be necessary for full functionality:
- No field for marking correct answers
- No weights/points for individual options
- No field for randomization/ordering preferences
- No constraints for entry ID uniqueness within a collection
Let's check if these fields exist in related types or if they're handled elsewhere:
Consider enhancing the schema to support:
- Correct answer designation
- Option-level scoring for partial credit
- Presentation control (randomization, grouping)
- Explicit uniqueness constraints for entry IDs
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
1148-1148: LGTM! Translation for Selection questions in Live Quizzes is consistent.The addition of "Auswahl" to the list of supported question types in Live Quizzes maintains consistent terminology and formatting.
Let's verify that the Selection question type is fully supported in Live Quizzes:
✅ Verification successful
Selection questions are fully supported in Live Quizzes
The GraphQL schema confirms that Selection questions are properly integrated into the Live Quiz functionality, validating the translation addition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if Selection questions are supported in Live Quiz related components rg -A 5 "ElementType.Selection.*Live"Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the enum/type definition for Selection questions rg -i "selection.*type|questiontype.*selection" -A 3 # Look for Live Quiz question type validation rg -i "live.*quiz.*question.*type|questiontype.*live" -A 5Length of output: 68535
1278-1278: LGTM! Translation for Selection questions in Group Activities is consistent.The addition of "Auswahl" to the list of supported question types in Group Activities maintains consistent terminology and formatting.
Let's verify that the Selection question type is fully supported in Group Activities:
✅ Verification successful
Selection questions are properly supported in Group Activities
The codebase confirms that Selection questions are fully integrated into the Group Activities feature:
- Selection type is explicitly included in the supported question types in GroupActivityWizard
- The GraphQL schema includes proper SelectionElementData handling for group activities
- The German translation accurately reflects this supported functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if Selection questions are supported in Group Activity related components rg -A 5 "ElementType.Selection.*Group"Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Selection type definitions and usage echo "=== Selection Type Definition ===" ast-grep --pattern 'ElementType.Selection' echo -e "\n=== Group Activity Question Types ===" rg -i "group.*activity.*question.*type" echo -e "\n=== Allowed Question Types ===" rg "allowedQuestionTypes|supportedQuestionTypes|validQuestionTypes" -A 5Length of output: 80141
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/util/src/index.ts (1)
174-182: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize reducer to avoid O(n²) complexity.
Using spread syntax within a reducer can lead to O(n²) time complexity. Consider using a more performant approach.
- const selections = element.answerCollection.entries.reduce< - Record<number, number> - >( - (acc, entry) => ({ - ...acc, - [entry.id]: 0, - }), - {} - ) + const selections: Record<number, number> = {} + for (const entry of element.answerCollection.entries) { + selections[entry.id] = 0 + }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 178-178: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
packages/util/src/index.ts (1)
92-124: Enhance error message with more details.The error handling and data processing for selection elements look good. Consider making the error message more descriptive to help with debugging.
- throw new Error( - 'Answer collection or solutions missing for selection element' - ) + throw new Error( + `Selection element ${element.id} is missing ${ + !element.answerCollection?.entries ? 'answer collection entries' : 'sample solutions' + }` + )packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (2)
1569-1576: Consider adding documentation for the numberOfInputs field.While the type structure is good, the
numberOfInputsfield's purpose and constraints could benefit from documentation. Is it used to limit the number of selections a user can make?Consider adding a description using GraphQL's built-in documentation:
type SelectionQuestionOptions { answerCollection: SelectionQuestionOptionsCollection answerCollectionSolutionIds: [Int!] hasAnswerFeedbacks: Boolean hasSampleSolution: Boolean + """ + Maximum number of options that can be selected. If not set, allows unlimited selections. + """ numberOfInputs: Int }
1582-1585: Consider enriching the options entry type.While the current structure is functional, consider adding optional fields to support richer option representation:
type SelectionQuestionOptionsCollectionEntry { id: Int! value: String! + """ + Optional description or hint for the option + """ + description: String + """ + Optional flag to mark an option as deprecated + """ + isDeprecated: Boolean + """ + Optional reason for deprecation + """ + deprecationReason: String }packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts (2)
Line range hint
182-210: Add documentation for the Selection Question Options fieldsWhile the implementation is solid, please add JSDoc comments to document:
- The purpose of
numberOfInputsand its relationship to the selection mechanism- The validation rules for
answerCollectionSolutionIds- The relationship between
hasSampleSolutionandanswerCollectionSolutionIds
Line range hint
313-326: Add default case to resolveType switch statementWhile the SELECTION case is properly handled, the switch statement should include a default case to handle unexpected element types and prevent undefined returns.
resolveType: (element) => { switch (element.type) { // ... existing cases ... case DB.ElementType.CONTENT: return ContentElementData + default: + throw new Error(`Unsupported element type: ${element.type}`) } },packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (4)
23525-23652: Add field descriptions for better documentationConsider adding descriptions to document the purpose and constraints of each field in the SelectionElementData type. This would improve schema self-documentation and help API consumers understand the intended usage.
23697-23708: Document the answer feedback featureThe hasAnswerFeedbacks field suggests a feedback system for answers. Consider:
- Adding a description field explaining when/how answer feedbacks are used
- Documenting if this is a feature flag or dynamic state
23739-23786: Consider adding ordering support for collection entriesThe SelectionQuestionOptionsCollection currently doesn't support explicit ordering of entries. Consider adding an order/position field to maintain consistent display order across clients.
23787-23830: Review ID type and value constraintsFor SelectionQuestionOptionsCollectionEntry:
- Consider using ID type instead of Int for better scalability
- Consider adding constraints or validation for the value field (e.g., max length, format)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(4 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(2 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts(5 hunks)packages/util/src/index.ts(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/util/src/index.ts
[error] 178-178: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: SonarCloud
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: check
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/util/src/index.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions and meaningful constant rename.The new types are properly defined and the rename of
FLASHCARD_KEYStoNO_OPTIONS_KEYSbetter reflects its broader usage across different element types.Also applies to: 26-30, 40-45
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (2)
1558-1567: LGTM! Type definition follows established patterns.The
SelectionElementDatatype is well-structured and consistent with other element data types in the schema.
1577-1580: LGTM! Well-structured collection type.The
SelectionQuestionOptionsCollectiontype provides a robust structure for managing reusable sets of selection options.packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts (3)
150-181: LGTM! Well-structured collection typesThe implementation of
SelectionQuestionOptionsCollectionEntryandSelectionQuestionOptionsCollectionfollows good practices with proper typing and nullability handling.
276-286: LGTM! Consistent element data implementationThe
SelectionElementDataimplementation maintains consistency with other element data types and properly extends the base interface.
Line range hint
150-326: Ensure test coverage for new Selection typesPlease ensure that unit tests are added to cover:
- Serialization/deserialization of Selection types
- Resolution of Selection elements in the ElementData union
- Validation of Selection question options
Would you like me to help generate the test cases for these scenarios?
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (3)
4885-4889: LGTM: SelectionElementData type properly added to union typesThe addition of SelectionElementData as a possible type is correctly implemented.
23622-23636: Consider adding validation for pointsMultiplierThe pointsMultiplier field should probably have some validation constraints to ensure it's not negative or zero. Consider either:
- Adding a custom scalar type with validation
- Documenting the valid range in the field description
- Implementing validation in the resolver
Line range hint
4885-23830: Verify schema changes with existing queries and mutationsThe schema changes look solid overall. Please ensure:
- All existing queries/mutations using the element types are updated
- Client-side code handles the new selection type correctly
- Documentation is updated to reflect these new types
Run this script to verify the schema changes:
✅ Verification successful
Schema changes are properly integrated with existing queries and mutations
The SelectionElement type and its related types are fully integrated into the GraphQL schema with consistent handling across all relevant operations. The implementation maintains proper type safety and follows the same patterns as other element types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all queries/mutations are updated for the new types # Check for queries/mutations using element types rg -A 5 "type.*Element.*{" packages/graphql/src/ # Check for fragments referencing element types rg -A 5 "fragment.*on.*Element" packages/graphql/src/ # Check for client-side type references rg -A 5 "SelectionElement" packages/Length of output: 65775
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
selection-question-instances
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 15m 00s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Julius Schlapbach |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
202
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
packages/util/src/index.ts (2)
92-96: Consider using a type predicate for better type inference.The current type guard using 'in' operator works but could be improved for better maintainability and type inference.
Consider creating a type predicate:
interface SelectionOptions { hasSampleSolution: boolean; numberOfInputs: number; } function isSelectionElement( element: ElementWithAnswerCollection ): element is ElementWithAnswerCollection & { options: SelectionOptions } { return ( element.type === PrismaElementType.SELECTION && 'hasSampleSolution' in element.options && 'numberOfInputs' in element.options ) }Then use it in the condition:
-} else if ( - element.type === PrismaElementType.SELECTION && - 'hasSampleSolution' in element.options && - 'numberOfInputs' in element.options -) { +} else if (isSelectionElement(element)) {
171-176: Consider using a consistent type guard approach.The type guard for SELECTION differs from the one in processElementData. Consider using the same type predicate approach for consistency.
Use the same type predicate suggested earlier:
-} else if ( - element.type === PrismaElementType.SELECTION && - 'answerCollection' in element && - element.answerCollection && - 'entries' in element.answerCollection -) { +} else if (isSelectionElement(element) && element.answerCollection?.entries) {apps/backend-docker/src/app.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-185: Consider enabling response caching for the new selection questions.Since this PR adds support for selection questions, consider enabling the commented-out response caching configuration for better performance, especially for read-heavy operations like fetching question data.
The existing commented configuration can be updated to include the new selection type:
useResponseCache({ ttlPerType: { Selection: 60000, // Cache selection questions for 1 minute // ... other types }, cache, session(req) { return req.body?.locals?.user?.sub ?? null }, })packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx (1)
42-59: Enhance accessibility and user experience.The select fields could benefit from additional accessibility attributes and loading state handling.
Consider these improvements:
<SelectField required value={selectedValue ? String(selectedValue) : undefined} onChange={(newValue) => { onChange({ ...responses, [inputIndex]: parseInt(newValue) }) }} items={selectItems} label={t('shared.questions.seCorrectAnswerN', { number: Number(inputIndex) + 1, })} labelType="small" placeholder={t('shared.questions.seSelectOption')} disabled={disabled} + aria-label={t('shared.questions.seCorrectAnswerN', { + number: Number(inputIndex) + 1, + })} + loading={!options.answerCollection?.entries?.length} className={{ root: 'w-full', select: { root: 'w-full', trigger: 'w-full' }, }} />packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx (2)
20-20: Define proper type for evaluation prop.The TODO comment indicates missing type definition for
SelectionInstanceEvaluation.Would you like me to help define the evaluation type interface based on the existing evaluation types in the codebase?
46-54: Add error boundary for markdown rendering.The Markdown component should be wrapped in an error boundary to handle potential rendering failures.
Consider adding an error boundary:
+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@klicker-uzh/shared-components/src/ErrorBoundary' {content !== '<br>' && ( <div className={twMerge( 'bg-primary-10 prose prose-p:!m-0 prose-img:!m-0 mb-4 min-h-[6rem] max-w-none flex-initial rounded border border-slate-300 p-4 leading-6' )}> + <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Failed to render content</div>}> <Markdown content={content} /> + </ErrorBoundary> </div> )}packages/shared-components/src/StudentElement.tsx (1)
289-299: Improve type safety for response casting.The current type casting could be made safer using type guards.
Consider adding a type guard:
function isSelectionResponse( response: unknown ): response is Record<number, number | undefined> { return ( typeof response === 'object' && response !== null && Object.values(response).every( (value) => typeof value === 'undefined' || typeof value === 'number' ) ) }Then use it in the component:
response={ typeof studentResponse !== 'undefined' - ? (studentResponse[element.id]?.response as Record<number, number | undefined>) + ? (isSelectionResponse(studentResponse[element.id]?.response) + ? studentResponse[element.id].response + : {}) - : (singleStudentResponse.response as Record<number, number | undefined>) + : (isSelectionResponse(singleStudentResponse.response) + ? singleStudentResponse.response + : {}) }packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (2)
5-81: Reduce duplication in collection descriptions and add TypeScript interfaces.Consider the following improvements:
- Extract the common description template to reduce duplication
- Add TypeScript interfaces for better type safety
+interface CollectionEntry { + value: string; +} + +interface AnswerCollection { + name: string; + description: string; + access: typeof Prisma.CollectionAccess[keyof typeof Prisma.CollectionAccess]; + entries: CollectionEntry[]; +} + +const COLLECTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE = (subject: string) => + `This collection contains questions about ${subject}. The description supports markdown syntax such as **bold** and *italic*.` + -export const ANSWER_COLLECTIONS = [ +export const ANSWER_COLLECTIONS: AnswerCollection[] = [ { name: 'Public Collection (Fruits)', - description: - 'This collection contains questions about fruits. The description supports markdown syntax such as **bold** and *italic*.', + description: COLLECTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE('fruits'), // ... rest of the collection }, // Apply similar changes to other collections ]
Line range hint
251-267: Enhance the explanation for the NUMERICAL question.The explanation could be more detailed to match the format of other questions in the test data. Consider explaining why these specific values are correct answers.
- explanation: 'Die korrekten Antworten sind 0%, 20% oder 100%.', + explanation: 'Die korrekten Antworten sind 0% (keine Investition), 20% (konservative Strategie) oder 100% (aggressive Strategie). Diese Werte repräsentieren typische Investitionsstrategien.',packages/markdown/package.json (1)
Line range hint
19-19: Coordinated design system version updateThe update of
@uzh-bf/design-systemfrom3.0.0-alpha.37to3.0.0-alpha.38is consistent across all packages. Given this is an alpha version update, consider:
- Testing the documentation site to ensure styles remain consistent
- Verifying no breaking changes in the shared components
- Validating markdown rendering remains unchanged
- Running the full test suite to catch any potential issues
Consider adding a changesets workflow to automate and document these coordinated version bumps in the future.
Also applies to: 21-21, 25-25, 42-42, 43-43
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
packages/shared-components/dist/utilities.cssis excluded by!**/dist/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
apps/auth/package.json(1 hunks)apps/backend-docker/package.json(1 hunks)apps/backend-docker/src/app.ts(1 hunks)apps/docs/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-control/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/quizzes/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-pwa/package.json(1 hunks)apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json(1 hunks)apps/func-response-processor/package.json(1 hunks)apps/office-addin/package.json(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts(0 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(3 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(3 hunks)packages/markdown/package.json(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts(5 hunks)packages/shared-components/package.json(1 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx(1 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/StudentElement.tsx(3 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx(1 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts(1 hunks)packages/transactional/package.json(1 hunks)packages/types/src/index.ts(5 hunks)packages/util/src/index.ts(6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- apps/frontend-pwa/package.json
- apps/auth/package.json
- packages/transactional/package.json
- apps/backend-docker/package.json
- apps/frontend-control/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/quizzes/index.tsx
- packages/i18n/messages/de.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx
[error] 56-56: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 73-73: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (21)
packages/util/src/index.ts (5)
Line range hint
26-30: LGTM! Improved naming convention.The rename from
FLASHCARD_KEYStoNO_OPTIONS_KEYSbetter reflects its broader usage across different element types.
40-45: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
ElementWithAnswerCollectiontype properly extendsElementwith optional properties for answer collections and solutions.
97-104: LGTM! Proper error handling for required fields.The error handling ensures that required data is present before processing.
106-115: LGTM! Clean and type-safe options construction.The selectionOptions construction is well-structured and maintains type safety with the non-null assertion operator.
177-180: LGTM! Efficient initialization using for...of loop.The implementation follows the performance optimization suggestion from the previous review by avoiding spread syntax in reducers.
packages/types/src/index.ts (4)
195-201: LGTM! Well-structured interface for answer collections.The interface is well-designed with unique identifiers for both the collection and its entries.
203-207: LGTM! Interface follows best practices.The interface correctly extends
BaseQuestionOptionsand all fields are properly marked as optional, ensuring backward compatibility.
218-218: LGTM! Union type correctly updated.The
ElementOptionsSelectiontype is properly added to theElementOptionsunion.
256-259: LGTM! Selection element data type and union update are correct.The
SelectionElementDatatype is properly defined usingIElementDatawith correct type parameters, and it's correctly added to theAllElementTypeDataunion.Also applies to: 267-267
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (3)
14-15: LGTM! Clear and consistent messages for selection questions.The messages follow the established pattern and use proper placeholder formatting.
1148-1148: LGTM! Live quiz type message properly updated.The message clearly lists all supported question types with proper formatting.
1273-1273: LGTM! Group activity type message properly updated.The message clearly lists all supported question types with proper formatting.
packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (2)
315-315: LGTM! Quiz updates are consistent.The new questions have been properly integrated into the existing quiz blocks, maintaining consistency across different quiz configurations.
Also applies to: 319-319, 335-335, 339-339
268-280: Verify the numberOfInputs constraint for the SELECTION question.The
numberOfInputs: 2constraint seems inconsistent with having 3 correct answers inanswerCollectionSolutions. This might prevent users from selecting all correct answers.apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json (1)
19-19: Verify compatibility with @uzh-bf/design-system alpha.38Since this is an alpha version update, we should verify there are no breaking changes that could affect the development workflow.
Let's check the changelog and any breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Version update is consistent across the codebase
The update to @uzh-bf/design-system@3.0.0-alpha.38 is synchronized across all packages in the repository, maintaining version consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes in @uzh-bf/design-system between alpha.37 and alpha.38 # Get the package's repository information echo "Fetching package information..." npm view @uzh-bf/design-system repository.url # Check for relevant commits between the versions gh api graphql -f query=' { repository(owner: "uzh-bf", name: "design-system") { releases(first: 2, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) { nodes { name description tagName } } } }'Length of output: 1291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all package.json files containing @uzh-bf/design-system echo "Checking usage across package.json files..." fd package.json --type f --exec grep -l "@uzh-bf/design-system" {} \; echo -e "\nChecking version specifications..." fd package.json --type f --exec grep -A 1 -B 1 '"@uzh-bf/design-system"' {} \; echo -e "\nChecking package-lock.json for version resolution..." fd package-lock.json --type f --exec grep -A 5 '"@uzh-bf/design-system"' {} \;Length of output: 2297
apps/func-response-processor/package.json (1)
21-21: Version update is consistentThe version update matches other packages in the monorepo.
apps/docs/package.json (1)
25-25: Verify documentation styling with new design system versionSince this is the documentation package, ensure that the new design system version doesn't affect the documentation styling and components.
Let's check for any style-related changes:
✅ Verification successful
Design system version update appears safe
The version update follows the same pattern as other applications in the monorepo, and the styling integration is consistent with the project's standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for style-related changes in the new version # Look for CSS/style related changes in the docs rg -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' -g '*.less' '@uzh-bf/design-system' # Check for documentation components usage ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@uzh-bf/design-system"'Length of output: 722
packages/shared-components/package.json (1)
42-42: Review peerDependency update impactAs this is a peerDependency in the shared-components package, ensure all consuming packages are compatible with the new version.
Let's check for potential compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
Version update is consistently applied
The update to @uzh-bf/design-system version 3.0.0-alpha.38 is already synchronized across all packages in the monorepo, including all consumers of shared-components. No compatibility issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for packages depending on shared-components # Find all package.json files that might depend on shared-components fd package.json | xargs rg "@klicker-uzh/shared-components" # Check for direct usage of design system components ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@uzh-bf/design-system"'Length of output: 544
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for @uzh-bf/design-system version specifications across all package.json files fd package.json | xargs rg "@uzh-bf/design-system" # Also check for any potential version conflicts in peerDependencies fd package.json | xargs rg "peerDependencies" -A 5 -B 1Length of output: 3830
packages/markdown/package.json (1)
43-43: Verify markdown rendering compatibilityAs this package handles markdown rendering, ensure the new design system version maintains consistent styling of markdown content.
Let's check for markdown-related components:
✅ Verification successful
Design system update impact is minimal
The markdown package uses only basic UI components (Prose, Modal, Button, Tooltip) from the design system in a straightforward manner. The minor version bump (alpha.37 to alpha.38) is unlikely to affect these fundamental components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for markdown-related components using the design system # Look for markdown components using design system ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@uzh-bf/design-system"' | rg -A 5 'Markdown|MD|Text' # Check for style imports in markdown files rg -g '*.md' -g '*.mdx' '@uzh-bf/design-system'Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all design system imports and markdown files # Find all design system imports rg -l "@uzh-bf/design-system" # Find markdown-related files fd -e md -e mdx -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx . packages/markdown/ # Check package.json contents cat packages/markdown/package.jsonLength of output: 25284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation of markdown components # Show Markdown.tsx implementation cat packages/markdown/src/Markdown.tsx # Show ImgWithModal.tsx implementation cat packages/markdown/src/ImgWithModal.tsx # Show Ellipsis.tsx implementation cat packages/markdown/src/Ellipsis.tsxLength of output: 13088
apps/frontend-manage/package.json (1)
24-24: Verify design system version update and its changesThe design system update from alpha.37 to alpha.38 should be intentional and necessary for the selection questions implementation.
Run this script to check the changelog and verify the update's necessity:
✅ Verification successful
Design system version update is consistent and valid ✅
All packages in the monorepo are consistently using version 3.0.0-alpha.38, which is the latest published version in the npm registry.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the changelog of @uzh-bf/design-system for version alpha.38 # Find and check package.json files for version consistency echo "Checking version consistency across packages..." fd -e json -x grep -l "@uzh-bf/design-system" {} \; | xargs grep "3.0.0-alpha" # Fetch the latest published versions echo -e "\nChecking published versions..." npm view @uzh-bf/design-system versions --json | jq '.[] | select(contains("3.0.0-alpha"))'Length of output: 1933
apps/office-addin/package.json (1)
6-6: Verify if Office add-in requires this design system updateThe design system update is being applied across all packages. Please confirm if the Office add-in specifically requires these changes for selection questions functionality.
Let's check if the Office add-in uses any selection-related components:
packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts (1)
87-102: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance validation for selection responses.
The current validation implementation could be strengthened by:
- Adding an
optionsparameter to validate againstnumberOfInputsand available options- Adding JSDoc documentation to describe the function's purpose and parameters
Consider this enhanced implementation:
+/** + * Validates a selection response against the question options + * @param response - Record mapping input indices to selected option IDs + * @param options - Selection question options containing numberOfInputs and valid options + * @returns boolean indicating if the response is valid + */ export function validateSelectionResponse({ response, + options, }: { response?: Record<number, number | undefined> + options: SelectionQuestionOptions }) { if ( !response || Object.values(response).some((value) => typeof value === 'undefined') || + Object.keys(response).length !== options.numberOfInputs || + Object.values(response).some( + (value) => + !options.answerCollection?.entries?.some((entry) => entry.id === value) + ) || new Set(Object.values(response)).size !== Object.values(response).length ) { return false } return true }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts (1)
92-92: Consider enhancing the comment to be more descriptive.The current comment could be more descriptive about what constitutes a valid submission.
- // ensure that all select components contain a submission value and that all values are unique + // Validate that: + // 1. All select components contain a submission value + // 2. No duplicate selections are allowed (all values must be unique) + // 3. Number of selections matches the required inputs + // 4. All selected values correspond to valid option IDspackages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (1)
34-53: Consider maintaining alphabetical order in the vegetables collection.The entries in the vegetables collection are not consistently alphabetized, unlike the other collections. 'Cucumber', 'Carrot' appear after 'Dill', breaking the alphabetical order.
entries: [ { value: 'Artichoke', }, { value: 'Broccoli', }, { value: 'Cabbage', }, + { + value: 'Carrot', + }, + { + value: 'Cucumber', + }, { value: 'Dill', }, - { - value: 'Cucumber', - }, - { - value: 'Carrot', - }, ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts(5 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx(1 hunks)packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: SonarCloud
- GitHub Check: check
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts (1)
87-102: Verify usage of validateSelectionResponse across the codebase.Let's ensure all calls to this function are updated with the required parameters after implementing the suggested changes.
✅ Verification successful
validateSelectionResponse changes are safe to implement
The function is only used in SelectionQuestion.tsx and all calls include the required parameters with correct types. No other usages found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of validateSelectionResponse echo "Searching for validateSelectionResponse usage..." rg "validateSelectionResponse" -A 2 # Search for SelectionQuestion components that might need validation echo "Searching for SelectionQuestion components..." rg "SelectionQuestion" -A 5Length of output: 71140
packages/prisma/src/data/data/TEST.ts (2)
Line range hint
251-267: LGTM! Well-structured numerical question with exact solutions.The question is well-implemented with clear content, matching explanation, and appropriate numerical restrictions.
315-319: LGTM! Consistent updates to quiz blocks.The new questions (5 and 6) have been consistently added to all relevant quiz blocks.
Also applies to: 335-339
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary, here are the updated release notes:
New Features
Improvements
Technical Updates