chore(TransactionFeedV2): Add tracking for newly completed cross-chain swaps

[sviderock]

Description

9th PR for RET-1207. Implements tracking for newly completed cross-chain swaps.

Test plan

Re-used existing corresponding test for the same functionality from existing feed.

Related issues

• Relates to RET-1207

Backwards compatibility

Yes

Network scalability

If a new NetworkId and/or Network are added in the future, the changes in this PR will:

• Continue to work without code changes, OR trigger a compilation error (guaranteeing we find it when a new network is added)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.74074% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.85%. Comparing base (89e51c4) to head (0d45274).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/transactions/feed/TransactionFeedV2.tsx	90.74%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6156      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.86%   88.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         728      728              
  Lines       30889    30934      +45     
  Branches     5650     5676      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        27448    27487      +39     
- Misses       3245     3251       +6     
  Partials      196      196              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/transactions/feed/TransactionFeedV2.tsx	92.47% <90.74%> (+0.21%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89e51c4...0d45274. Read the comment docs.

[jeanregisser]

🚀

[jeanregisser]

Is there a risk that the tracking could be triggered twice if one of these deps change without being in sync with the other?

[sviderock]

@jeanregisser You're right! Initially, I thought is shouldn't be a problem based on how the flow of data?.transactions and standByTransactions is tightly connected. But now as I think about it, it makes a lot more sense to utilize and add an extra field to useNewlyCompletedTransactions as it should be more precise in signaling the change.

[sviderock]

@jeanregisser updated