Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update questions.json #693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

chore: update questions.json #693

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

eltociear
Copy link
Contributor

fucntion -> function

fucntion -> function
Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: The PR aims to correct a typographical error in the questions.json file, ensuring the readability and accuracy of training data, which is critical for accurate Text-to-SQL generation.
  • Key components modified: The training_data/similarweb/questions.json file.
  • Impact assessment: The change improves data accuracy and readability without introducing any new functionality or dependencies.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: None. The change is isolated to a single file and does not affect system dependencies or integration points.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: None. The change is a simple correction in a JSON file and does not affect the system architecture.
  • Component interactions: None. The change does not alter how components interact within the system.
  • Integration points: None. The file is used for training data and does not impact integration points.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

Example 1: Correction in questions.json

  • File Path: training_data/similarweb/questions.json
    • Submitted PR Code:
      [
          {
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date fucntion , Plot a line chart ",
    
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
          "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%Tesla%' or company_name = 'Ford') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2023-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
      },
      ...
    
    ]
    - **Analysis**:
    - **Current logic and potential issues**: The change corrects a typo from "fucntion" to "function." No functional issues are observed with this change.
    - **Edge cases and error handling**: None applicable for this change.
    - **Cross-component impact **: None.
    - **Business logic considerations **: None.
    - **LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements**: None required. The change is straightforward and corrects a typo.
    - **Improvement rationale **: None.
    
    

Example 2: Another Correction in questions.json

  • File Path: training_data/similarweb/questions.json
    • Submitted PR Code:
      [
          {
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on ebay and amazon from 2018 to 2021? Convert varchar to date using to date fucntion , Plot a line chart ",
    
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on ebay and amazon from 2018 to 2021? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
          "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%ebay%' or company_name ilike '%amazon%') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2021-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
      },
      ...
    
    ]
    - **Analysis**:
    - **Current logic and potential issues**: Similar to the previous example, this change corrects a typo from "fucntion" to "function." No functional issues are observed with this change.
    - **Edge cases and error handling**: None applicable for this change.
    - **Cross-component impact **: None.
    - **Business logic considerations **: None.
    - **LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements**: None required. The change is straightforward and corrects a typo.
    - **Improvement rationale **: None.
    
    

Cross-cutting Concerns

  • Data flow analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • State management implications: Not applicable for this change.
  • Error propagation paths: Not applicable for this change.
  • Edge case handling across components: Not applicable for this change.

Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis

  • Complexity analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • Performance implications: Not applicable for this change.
  • Memory usage considerations: Not applicable for this change.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure: The questions.json file is well-organized, and the changes are isolated to the specific questions that needed correction.
  • Design patterns usage: Not applicable for JSON files.
  • Error handling approach: Not applicable for this change.
  • Resource management: Not applicable for this change.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues: None
  • 🟡 Warnings: None

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The corrections improve readability and maintainability by ensuring consistency in terminology.
  • Readability issues: None.
  • Performance bottlenecks: None applicable for this change.

4. Security Assessment

4.1 Security Considerations

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: Not applicable for this change.
  • Data handling concerns: Not applicable for this change.
  • Input validation: Not applicable for this change.
  • Security best practices: Not applicable for this change.

4.2 Vulnerability Analysis

  • Potential security risks: None.
  • Mitigation strategies: Not applicable for this change.
  • Security testing requirements: Not applicable for this change.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • Integration test requirements: Not applicable for this change.
  • Edge cases coverage: Not applicable for this change.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

[
  {
    "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
    "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%Tesla%' or company_name = 'Ford') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2023-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
  },
  ...
]
  • Coverage improvements: Not applicable for this change.
  • Performance testing needs: Not applicable for this change.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration): None.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: The correction improves maintainability by ensuring consistency in terminology.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: None.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: None. The change is isolated to a single file and does not affect deployment processes.
  • Key operational considerations: None. The change does not affect operational processes.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required: None
  2. Important improvements suggested: None
  3. Best practices to implement: None
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address: None

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: Continue to monitor and correct any inconsistencies in training data to ensure accuracy.
  • Business capability evolution: Maintain high standards of data quality to support accurate Text-to-SQL generation.
  • System integration impacts: None. The change is isolated and does not affect system integration.

@zainhoda zainhoda merged commit cd29916 into vanna-ai:main Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants