Vector.of(T element) performance improvement #2659
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2659 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 92.87% 92.87%
Complexity 5370 5370
=========================================
Files 89 89
Lines 12790 12790
Branches 1620 1620
=========================================
Hits 11879 11879
Misses 722 722
Partials 189 189 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
danieldietrich
approved these changes
May 16, 2021
sleepytomcat
added a commit
to sleepytomcat/vavr
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2021
danieldietrich
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed here #2656 (comment)