Include filterDOMProps in fields

[Gervwyk]

Solves #203

[radekmie]

Please, keep imports aligned and correctly spaced.

[Gervwyk]

Oops. Sorry. Fixed.

[janowsiany]

@Gervwyk I think it will be ok if we add {...filterDOMProps(props)} in wrapField.js also. It will solve #207. @radekmie What do you think about this?

[radekmie]

Why have you removed it? We shouldn't use filterDOMProps here as it's not wrapped with connectField, but it's still needed.

[Gervwyk]

Ahh. Sorry. That was just a typo of working on to many things at once.. My bad.

[Gervwyk]

@janowsiany I was also considering #207 but still wanted to experiment with it. I'll do some tests later today then we can combine it in this PR. @radekmie what do you think of including filterDOMProps in wrapField?

[radekmie]

We have to choose one way somewhere in the future (2.0.0 probably, as it will be a breaking change): where all unused props go. To the wrapper? To the input? To the inner wrapper (if any)? To nowhere (discard)? Right now, it's depending on the theme and field.

[Gervwyk]

I struggle to see how it will not be dependant on the theme and field. However, I think its a case of either assigning props to the wrapper or to the field on schema level - which will mean a breaking change or we can say to include a object for wrapper props and all other props are assigned on field level.
Something like:

new SimpleSchema({
    size: {
        type: String,
        allowedValues: ['xs', 's', 'm', 'l', 'xl'],
        uniforms: {
         showSearch: true,
         filterOption: (input, option) => option.props.value.toLowerCase().indexOf(input.toLowerCase()) >= 0
         wrapperProps: { 
              labelCol: {span: 3, offset: 12},
              wrapperCol: {span: 3, offset: 12}
        }
    }
})

Where showSearch and filterOption end up as field props and labelCol and wrapperCol on the wrapper component. Think this might be less of a breaking change... Not sure how this fit in with other themes.

[radekmie]

Yep, there's also #185. All in all - it shouldn't be discussed here.