ci: update action #4046
ci: update action #4046
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe recent modifications to the GitHub Actions workflows focus on enhancing security and standardizing authentication methods by replacing references to Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/changeset-version.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/draft.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lock.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-tag.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/stale.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
.github/workflows/draft.yml (1)
17-17: Approved: Improved token management.Changing the token from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security by using the standard GitHub token with specific permissions.To ensure consistency, verify the usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENin other workflow files.Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENacross workflow files.The
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENis used consistently across various workflow files, ensuring standardized and secure token management.
.github/workflows/stale.yml.github/workflows/release-tag.yml.github/workflows/lock.yml.github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml.github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml.github/workflows/draft.yml.github/workflows/changeset-version.yml.github/workflows/build.yml.github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.ymlScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN` in other workflow files. # Test: Search for the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN`. Expect: Consistent usage across all workflow files. rg --type yaml 'secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/Length of output: 1078
.github/workflows/lock.yml (1)
18-18: Approved: Improved token management.Changing the token from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security by using the standard GitHub token with specific permissions.To ensure consistency, verify the usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENin other workflow files.Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENacross workflow files.The
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENis consistently used in the following workflow files:
- .github/workflows/stale.yml
- .github/workflows/lock.yml
- .github/workflows/release-tag.yml
- .github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml
- .github/workflows/changeset-version.yml
- .github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- .github/workflows/draft.yml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN` in other workflow files. # Test: Search for the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN`. Expect: Consistent usage across all workflow files. rg --type yaml 'secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/Length of output: 1078
.github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml (1)
19-19: Approved: Improved token management.Changing the token from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security by using the standard GitHub token with specific permissions.To ensure consistency, verify the usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENin other workflow files.Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENacross workflow files.The
secrets.GITHUB_TOKENis used consistently in the following workflow files:
.github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml.github/workflows/lock.yml.github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml.github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml.github/workflows/draft.yml.github/workflows/stale.yml.github/workflows/build.yml.github/workflows/release-tag.yml.github/workflows/changeset-version.ymlScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN` in other workflow files. # Test: Search for the usage of `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN`. Expect: Consistent usage across all workflow files. rg --type yaml 'secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/Length of output: 1078
.github/workflows/stale.yml (1)
13-13: LGTM! Improved security and simplicity.Updating the
repo-tokento${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security and simplifies the authentication process..github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml (1)
26-26: LGTM! Improved security and best practices.Updating the
GITHUB_TOKENenvironment variable to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security and aligns with best practices for token management..github/workflows/build.yml (2)
24-25: LGTM! Integration with external services.Adding
TURBO_TOKENandTURBO_TEAMenvironment variables facilitates integration with external services.
34-34: LGTM! Improved security and best practices.Updating the
GITHUB_TOKENenvironment variable to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}enhances security and aligns with best practices for token management..github/workflows/changeset-version.yml (1)
55-55: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management..github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml (3)
18-18: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management.
27-27: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management.
36-36: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management..github/workflows/release-tag.yml (2)
61-61: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management.
72-72: LGTM! Token update aligns with best practices.The change from
${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}to${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}improves security and aligns with GitHub's recommended practices for token management.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- .github/actions/setup-node/action.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/changeset-version.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (6 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-tag.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .node-version (1 hunks)
- internal/lint-configs/commitlint-config/index.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/deploy.yml
- .node-version
- internal/lint-configs/commitlint-config/index.mjs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- .github/workflows/changeset-version.yml
- .github/workflows/issue-close-require.yml
- .github/workflows/issue-labeled.yml
- .github/workflows/release-tag.yml
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml
Additional comments not posted (9)
.github/actions/setup-node/action.yml (6)
1-4: LGTM!The name and description of the action are clear and appropriate.
5-7: LGTM!The usage of a composite action is appropriate for setting up Node.js and pnpm.
8-10: LGTM!The action correctly installs pnpm using
pnpm/action-setup@v4.
11-16: LGTM!The action correctly installs Node.js using
actions/setup-node@v4and configures pnpm caching.
17-21: LGTM!The script correctly retrieves the pnpm store path and sets it in the environment.
22-40: LGTM!The caching and dependency installation steps are correctly implemented.
.github/workflows/ci.yml (3)
40-41: LGTM!The new local action simplifies and centralizes the Node.js setup process.
74-75: LGTM!The new local action simplifies and centralizes the Node.js setup process.
96-97: LGTM!The new local action simplifies and centralizes the Node.js setup process.
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}instead of${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}.