fix: after deleting the form item, you will also get the form value #4481
Conversation
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anncwb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, focusing on the addition and reorganization of sections in various README files, specifically for Japanese, English, and Chinese versions. Modifications to error handling logic in request files enhance the flexibility of error responses. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.zh-CN.md (1)
127-129: LGTM: Addition of Star History section with a minor suggestionThe inclusion of the Star History chart is a nice touch that showcases the project's growth and popularity. It's well-placed at the end of the document.
Consider adding a brief description before the chart to provide context for new users. For example:
## Star History 下图展示了项目的 Star 增长历史： [](https://star-history.com/#vbenjs/vue-vben-admin&Date)README.md (1)
127-129: Approved: Star History section adds value, but could be improved.The addition of the Star History section is a great way to showcase the project's growing popularity. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance its effectiveness:
- Add a brief introductory text explaining what the chart represents.
- Ensure the chart renders correctly across different markdown viewers.
Consider adding a brief explanation before the chart, like this:
## Star History This chart shows the growth in GitHub stars for the Vue Vben Admin project over time, reflecting its increasing popularity and adoption within the developer community. [](https://star-history.com/#vbenjs/vue-vben-admin&Date)packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts (2)
92-92: Consider renamingupdateStateto reflect its specific purpose.Renaming the method
updateStateto something more descriptive likehandleDeletedSchemaFieldscan improve code readability by clearly indicating that it handles deletion of schema fields.
95-95: Translate the comment to English for consistency.The inline comment
// 进行了删除schema操作should be translated to English to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (9)
- README.ja-JP.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- README.zh-CN.md (2 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/api/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/api/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/api/request.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts (3 hunks)
- playground/src/api/request.ts (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.ja-JP.md
Additional comments not posted (15)
apps/web-naive/src/api/request.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-98: Verify alignment with PR objectivesWhile the changes in this file enhance error handling capabilities, they don't appear to directly address the reported bug of form submissions including deleted field values.
To ensure we're not missing any relevant changes, let's search for form-related modifications:
If these searches don't yield relevant results, it might be worth clarifying with the PR author how the changes in this file relate to the reported bug, or if there are additional changes that should be included in this PR.
playground/src/api/request.ts (1)
97-100: Approved: Enhanced error handling capability, but clarification neededThe addition of the
_errorparameter and the explanatory comment improve the error handling infrastructure, allowing for more detailed error processing in the future. This is a positive change that doesn't introduce any breaking changes.However, I have a few suggestions and questions:
Consider adding a TODO comment to remind developers to implement custom error handling in the future. For example:
// TODO: Implement custom error handling based on error codes message.error(msg);The current implementation doesn't utilize the new
_errorparameter. It might be beneficial to provide an example of how it could be used, even if it's just a console.log for debugging purposes.Could you clarify how this change relates to the PR objective of fixing the bug where deleted form items are still submitted? The connection isn't immediately clear from this code change.
pnpm-workspace.yaml (8)
24-24: LGTM: Minor version update for @iconify/jsonThe update from ^2.2.251 to ^2.2.252 for @iconify/json is a minor version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible changes or bug fixes. This update is in line with good practices for keeping dependencies current.
27-27: LGTM: Patch update for @intlify/core-baseThe update from ^10.0.2 to ^10.0.3 for @intlify/core-base is a patch version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible bug fixes. This update is appropriate and follows good practices for maintaining dependencies.
34-34: LGTM: Minor version update for @stylistic/stylelint-pluginThe update from ^3.0.1 to ^3.1.0 for @stylistic/stylelint-plugin is a minor version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible new features or bug fixes. This update is in line with good practices for keeping dependencies current.
129-129: LGTM: Patch update for postcss-preset-envThe update from ^10.0.3 to ^10.0.5 for postcss-preset-env is a patch version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible bug fixes. This update is appropriate and follows good practices for maintaining dependencies.
172-172: LGTM: Patch update for vue-i18nThe update from ^10.0.2 to ^10.0.3 for vue-i18n is a patch version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible bug fixes. This update is appropriate and follows good practices for maintaining dependencies.
Given that vue-i18n is crucial for the project's internationalization features, this update may include important bug fixes or improvements relevant to the application's localization capabilities.
89-89: LGTM: Minor version update for eslint-plugin-import-xThe update from ^4.2.1 to ^4.3.0 for eslint-plugin-import-x is a minor version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible new features or bug fixes. This update is appropriate for keeping the dependency current.
As this is an ESLint plugin, it's worth checking if there are any new or modified linting rules that might affect the project. You can use the following command to check the recent changes:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog or release notes for eslint-plugin-import-x gh repo view un-es/eslint-plugin-import-x --json url --jq .url | xargs -I {} gh api "{}releases" --jq '.[0] | {tag_name, body}'
Line range hint
24-172: Overall assessment of dependency updatesThe changes in this file consist of minor and patch version updates to various dependencies. While these updates are good practice for maintaining the project's dependencies, they don't appear to directly address the form submission bug mentioned in the PR objectives (fixing the issue where deleted form fields are still submitted).
To ensure these updates don't introduce any unexpected changes or conflicts with the bug fix:
Run the project's test suite:
Manually test the form submission functionality described in the bug report:
If all tests pass and the manual verification confirms the bug fix, these dependency updates can be considered incidental to the main objective of the PR and do not pose any apparent issues.
28-28: LGTM: Minor version update for @intlify/unplugin-vue-i18nThe update from ^5.0.0 to ^5.2.0 for @intlify/unplugin-vue-i18n is a minor version bump, which typically indicates backward-compatible new features or bug fixes. This update is appropriate for keeping the dependency current.
As this update spans two minor versions (5.1.0 and 5.2.0), it would be prudent to review the changelog for any significant changes or new features that might affect the project. You can use the following command to check the recent changes:
README.zh-CN.md (3)
80-82: LGTM: Addition of Changelog sectionThe inclusion of a changelog section with a link to the GitHub releases page is a valuable addition. It provides users with easy access to the project's update history, which aligns well with the project's documentation and transparency.
80-82: Overall feedback on README changesThe additions to the README.zh-CN.md file (Changelog and Star History sections) are positive improvements that enhance the project's documentation and visibility. However, please consider the following points:
- Ensure that these changes don't overshadow the main purpose of the PR, which is to fix a bug related to form submission after deleting a form item.
- Verify that any removed content (as mentioned in the AI summary) was intentional and doesn't result in loss of important information.
- If applicable, consider adding a brief note about the bug fix in the Changelog section or elsewhere in the documentation to keep users informed about this improvement.
These README changes are approved, but please address the above points to ensure comprehensive documentation updates that align with the PR's primary objective.
Also applies to: 127-129
80-82: Verify alignment with PR objectives and previous content removalWhile the additions to the README are valuable, they don't seem to directly address the bug fix mentioned in the PR objectives (form submission after deleting a form item). Consider the following points:
- Ensure that the necessary documentation updates related to the bug fix are included, if applicable.
- The AI summary mentioned that previous occurrences of the Changelog and Star History sections were removed. Please verify that these removals were intentional and that no important information was lost in the process.
To check for any unintended removals, you can run the following command:
This will help ensure that the changes are comprehensive and don't inadvertently remove important information.
Also applies to: 127-129
packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts (2)
69-71: Confirm the order of state updates in theonUpdatecallback.Updating
prevStatebefore assigning the newstateensures the previous state is accurately captured. This sequence appears correct.
105-105: Verify that setting field values toundefinedprevents them from being submitted.Setting the field value to
undefinedmay not remove it from the form's submission data. Ensure that this approach effectively excludes the deleted fields from the submitted values. If necessary, consider using a method to remove the field entirely from the form's values.
Description
fixed #4480
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores