feat: 新增nest模板、新增server类型的vite配置 #4743
Conversation
MZ-Dlovely
requested review from
anncwb,
vince292007 and
a team
as code owners
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 6ea7a63 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 43 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several configuration files and updates for a Nest.js application, including environment variable settings for development, production, and analysis environments. New modules for authentication, routing, and middleware are established, along with a comprehensive setup for handling JWT authentication. The project structure is enhanced with plugins and utilities for cookie management and error handling, aiming to streamline the application's functionality and improve modularity. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
i'm doing~ |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
apps/backend-nest/src/index.ts (2)
1-1: Consider adding type annotations for imported functions.While TypeScript can infer types, explicitly declaring the return types of imported functions would improve code clarity and maintainability.
-import { bootstrap, useApp } from './app'; +import type { INestApplication } from '@nestjs/common'; +import { bootstrap, useApp }: { bootstrap: () => Promise<void>, useApp: () => INestApplication } from './app';
5-5: Review the singleton pattern implementation.The default export immediately executes
useApp()at module load time. This pattern needs careful consideration:
- It creates a global singleton instance
- The timing of initialization might be important
- Testing might be more difficult due to the singleton pattern
Consider these alternatives:
- Export the function instead of its result to allow controlled initialization
- Use a lazy initialization pattern
- Add a way to reset the instance for testing
-export default useApp(); +// Option 1: Export function +export default useApp; + +// Option 2: Lazy initialization +let app: INestApplication | null = null; +export default () => { + if (!app) { + app = useApp(); + } + return app; +};internal/vite-config/src/index.ts (1)
4-4: Consider adding deprecation notice for the alias.While maintaining backward compatibility through aliasing is good practice, consider:
- Adding a deprecation notice to encourage usage of
loadApplicationEnv- Planning for the removal of the alias in a future major version
Here's a suggested approach using JSDoc:
+/** @deprecated Use loadApplicationEnv instead. Will be removed in next major version. */ export { loadApplicationEnv as loadAndConvertEnv } from './utils/env';apps/backend-nest/vite.config.mts (1)
1-8: Consider adding configuration documentation.Since this is a new configuration file that others might need to modify, consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and available options.
+/** + * Vite configuration for NestJS backend + * @see {@link https://vitejs.dev/config/} + */ import { defineConfig } from '@vben/vite-config'; +/** + * @param {Object} server - Server-specific configurations + * @param {Object} server.swc - SWC compiler options + * @param {Object} server.template - Template configurations + * @param {Object} vite - Vite-specific configurations + */ export default defineConfig(async () => {internal/vite-config/src/config/index.ts (1)
32-34: LGTM: Switch case implementation is consistentThe server case implementation follows the established pattern and correctly delegates to
defineServerConfig.Consider adding
export * from './server';alongside the other exports to make server-specific utilities available to consumers:export * from './application'; export * from './library'; +export * from './server';scripts/vsh/src/check-dep/index.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM! Consider documenting the ignore patterns.The addition of '@nestjs/cli' to
ignoreMatchesis appropriate since it's a development-time dependency used for NestJS project scaffolding and development tasks. This prevents false positives in dependency checks.Consider adding a comment block above the
ignoreMatchesarray to document why certain packages are ignored. This would help future maintainers understand the rationale. Example:const unused = await depcheck(pkg.dir, { + // Ignore patterns: + // - Build tools (vite, vitest, unbuild) + // - CLI tools (@nestjs/cli) + // - Local workspace packages (@vben/*) + // - Type definitions (@types/*) ignoreMatches: [internal/vite-config/src/config/application.ts (3)
19-19: Document the required environment variables.The configuration now expects specific environment variables for
appTitle,base, andport. Please ensure these are documented in the project's environment variable documentation.Consider adding a
.env.examplefile or updating the existing one with these required variables and their descriptions:+ # Application title displayed in the browser + VITE_APP_TITLE=Vben Admin + + # Base public path for the application + VITE_BASE_URL=/ + + # Development server port + VITE_PORT=3000
Line range hint
52-63: Consider optimizing the build configuration.The current build configuration can be enhanced for better performance and maintainability:
- Consider using dynamic imports for better code splitting
- The drop configuration could include more development-only code
- Asset file naming could be more consistent
Consider these optimizations:
build: { rollupOptions: { output: { - assetFileNames: '[ext]/[name]-[hash].[ext]', - chunkFileNames: 'js/[name]-[hash].js', - entryFileNames: 'jse/index-[name]-[hash].js', + assetFileNames: 'assets/[name].[hash][ext]', + chunkFileNames: 'js/[name].[hash].js', + entryFileNames: 'js/[name].[hash].js', + manualChunks(id) { + if (id.includes('node_modules')) { + return 'vendor'; + } + } }, }, target: 'es2015', + minify: 'esbuild', }, esbuild: { drop: isBuild ? [ - // 'console', + 'console', 'debugger', ] : [], legalComments: 'none', + treeShaking: true, },
Line range hint
82-89: Make warmup paths configurable.The hardcoded paths in the warmup configuration might not match all project structures, especially in a monorepo setup.
Consider making these paths configurable:
server: { host: true, port, warmup: { - clientFiles: [ - './index.html', - './src/bootstrap.ts', - './src/{views,layouts,router,store,api}/*', - ], + clientFiles: application.warmupPaths ?? [ + './index.html', + './src/bootstrap.ts', + './src/{views,layouts,router,store,api}/*', + ], }, },internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (2)
Line range hint
89-90: Consider enhancing compress type validationThe current validation for compress types could be more robust using a type-safe approach.
Consider this improvement:
- const compressTypes = (VITE_COMPRESS ?? '') - .split(',') - .filter((item) => item === 'brotli' || item === 'gzip'); + const VALID_COMPRESS_TYPES = ['brotli', 'gzip'] as const; + type CompressType = typeof VALID_COMPRESS_TYPES[number]; + const compressTypes = (VITE_COMPRESS ?? '') + .split(',') + .filter((item): item is CompressType => + VALID_COMPRESS_TYPES.includes(item as CompressType));
109-133: Add validation for adapter values and document defaultsWhile the function is well-structured, consider these improvements:
- The adapter value should be validated against known options
- Default values should be documented for maintainability
Consider this enhancement:
+const VALID_ADAPTERS = ['nest', 'express', 'fastify'] as const; +type ValidAdapter = typeof VALID_ADAPTERS[number]; + async function loadServerEnv(match = 'VITE_', confFiles = getConfFiles()) { const envConfig = await loadEnv(match, confFiles); + + // Default values for server configuration + const DEFAULTS = { + ADAPTER: 'nest', + APP_NAME: 'Vben Server', + APP_PATH: 'src', + EXPORT_NAME: 'default', + PORT: 5173, + } as const; const { VITE_ADAPTER, // ... other destructured values } = envConfig; + const adapter = getString(VITE_ADAPTER, DEFAULTS.ADAPTER); + if (!VALID_ADAPTERS.includes(adapter as ValidAdapter)) { + throw new Error(`Invalid adapter: ${adapter}. Must be one of: ${VALID_ADAPTERS.join(', ')}`); + } return { - adapter: getString(VITE_ADAPTER, 'nest') as RequestAdapterOption, + adapter: adapter as RequestAdapterOption, appName: getString(VITE_APP_NAME, DEFAULTS.APP_NAME), // ... rest of the return object }; }package.json (2)
30-30: Standardize the filter flag usage across scripts.The scripts use different flags for filtering:
build:nestuses--filterdev:nestuses-FWhile both work, it's better to standardize the approach across all scripts.
Consider using the same flag style:
- "build:nest": "pnpm run build --filter=@vben/backend-nest", - "dev:nest": "pnpm -F @vben/backend-nest run dev", + "build:nest": "pnpm run build --filter=@vben/backend-nest", + "dev:nest": "pnpm run dev --filter=@vben/backend-nest"Also applies to: 46-46
Line range hint
30-46: Consider adding a test script for the NestJS backend.Other packages in the monorepo appear to have corresponding test scripts. For consistency and maintainability, consider adding a
test:nestscript.Consider adding:
+ "test:nest": "pnpm run test --filter=@vben/backend-nest",internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (1)
141-154: Add more detailed JSDoc comments for the ServerPluginOptions properties.While the property names are clear, adding detailed JSDoc comments would improve maintainability and developer experience.
Consider adding comments like this:
interface ServerPluginOptions extends CommonPluginOptions { + /** + * Server adapter configuration for vite-plugin-node + * Controls how the server handles requests and responses + */ adapter?: RequestAdapterOption; + /** + * Name of the NestJS application + * Used for dependency injection and module organization + */ appName?: string; // Add similar comments for other properties
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
- apps/backend-nest/.env (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.analyze (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.build.json (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/vite.config.mts (1 hunks)
- cspell.json (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/package.json (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/config/application.ts (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/config/index.ts (2 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (5 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (5 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (3 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (2 hunks)
- scripts/vsh/src/check-dep/index.ts (1 hunks)
- vben-admin.code-workspace (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- apps/backend-nest/.env
- apps/backend-nest/.env.analyze
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production
- apps/backend-nest/.vscode/settings.json
- apps/backend-nest/package.json
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts
- apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.build.json
- apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (21)
apps/backend-nest/vite.config.mts (2)
3-8:⚠️ Potential issueConfiguration appears incomplete.
The current configuration with empty objects doesn't align with the PR objectives. The following essential configurations are missing:
- SWC compilation settings
- Template configurations
- Server-specific settings for NestJS
Consider adding the necessary configurations. Here's a suggested structure:
export default defineConfig(async () => { return { - server: {}, + server: { + swc: { + enable: true, + // Add SWC compilation options + }, + // Add NestJS specific server configurations + template: { + // Add template configurations + } + }, - vite: {}, + vite: { + // Add Vite-specific configurations + build: { + // Add build configurations + } + }, }; }, 'server');
1-1: Verify package availability and version.The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the package is properly set up.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't yield results, so let's broaden our search to:
- Check all package.json files to verify the package existence
- Look for all vite configuration files to understand the setup
- Search for any references to the package in the codebase
This will help us determine if the package is properly set up and if the import is valid.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have confirmed:
- The package
@vben/vite-configexists in the workspace as a private package- It's being used consistently across multiple applications in the monorepo
- The import pattern matches other applications' usage
- The configuration structure follows the same pattern as other apps
The package import is correctly configured.
The minimal configuration is intentional as it follows the server-type template pattern seen in the codebase, where basic server and vite objects are defined and can be extended as needed. The empty configuration is valid for initial setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the package is defined in workspace rg -g "package.json" "@vben/vite-config" # Check for the defineConfig export ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ defineConfig'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check workspace packages fd -g "package.json" --exec cat {} \; # Check for vite config related files fd -e ts -e mts -g "*vite*" --exec cat {} \; # Look for any references to vite-config rg "@vben/vite-config"Length of output: 51514
apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts (1)
5-5: Verify AppModule configuration and environment setup.Please ensure that:
- The AppModule is properly configured with all necessary providers and controllers
- Environment variables are documented and included in the example .env files
Let's verify the module setup and environment configuration:
internal/vite-config/src/config/index.ts (3)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement follows existing patternsThe import statement for
defineServerConfigis correctly placed with other local imports and maintains the established code organization.
15-15: LGTM: Type signature extension maintains compatibilityThe addition of 'server' to the type union is well-integrated and maintains backward compatibility with the default 'auto' value.
8-8: Verify the existence of the server configuration moduleLet's ensure that the imported server configuration module exists and is properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Server configuration module is properly implemented and functional
The
defineServerConfigfunction exists ininternal/vite-config/src/config/server.tsand is correctly implemented with:
- Proper type imports and dependencies
- Configuration merging logic
- Server-specific optimizations and plugin loading
- Environment variable handling
- Port and host configuration
The import statement in the original file is valid and references a properly implemented module.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the server configuration module # Check if the server.ts file exists in the same directory fd -e ts "server.ts" "internal/vite-config/src/config" # Verify the exported defineServerConfig function ast-grep --pattern 'export function defineServerConfig' "internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts"Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the actual implementation of defineServerConfig rg -A 5 "export function defineServerConfig" "internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts"Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check the content of the server.ts file cat internal/vite-config/src/config/server.tsLength of output: 1663
cspell.json (1)
9-54: LGTM! Word additions align with project requirements.The new words added to the spell checker dictionary appropriately support:
- The NestJS integration ("nestjs")
- Frontend-related terms ("antdv", "lucide", "uicons")
- Build tools and configurations ("vitejs", "vitepress")
All entries are properly alphabetized.
internal/vite-config/package.json (1)
58-59: LGTM! Addition of vite-plugin-node aligns with server-side configuration goals.The addition of this plugin is appropriate for supporting server-side Vite configurations and NestJS integration.
Let's verify the plugin's compatibility with the project's Vite version:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Plugin version is compatible with project's Vite setup
The verification shows:
- Project is using Vite 5.4.x
- vite-plugin-node@4.0.0 is being used and is properly resolved with Vite 5.4.10
- The plugin is actively maintained and compatible with current Vite version
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check vite-plugin-node compatibility with project's Vite version # Expected: Package versions should be compatible # Get the installed versions rg '"vite":|"vite-plugin-node":' package.json internal/*/package.json -A 1Length of output: 604
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual versions in the catalog rg '"version":' package.json internal/*/package.json -A 1Length of output: 802
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the pnpm-lock.yaml for the actual resolved version of vite-plugin-node rg "vite-plugin-node(?:@|\s)" pnpm-lock.yaml -A 3Length of output: 425
internal/vite-config/src/config/application.ts (1)
13-13: Verify the impact of replacingloadAndConvertEnvwithloadApplicationEnv.This import change could affect other parts of the codebase that might still be using
loadAndConvertEnv.✅ Verification successful
The search results show that
loadAndConvertEnvis actually re-exported as an alias forloadApplicationEnvininternal/vite-config/src/index.ts, andloadApplicationEnvis properly exported fromutils/env.ts. This indicates a well-maintained backward compatibility. Let me verify if this is the only occurrence and check the implementation to ensure the functionality remains consistent.
Let me try a different approach to check the implementation and usage:
Import change is properly handled with backward compatibility
The verification shows that:
loadApplicationEnvis properly implemented inutils/env.tswith all necessary environment variable handling- Backward compatibility is maintained through re-export in
index.ts:export { loadApplicationEnv as loadAndConvertEnv }- No other direct usage of
loadAndConvertEnvexists in the codebase besides the re-export🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of loadAndConvertEnv # Expected: No occurrences of the old function name echo "Checking for remaining usage of loadAndConvertEnv..." rg "loadAndConvertEnv" echo "Checking if loadApplicationEnv is properly exported..." rg "export.*loadApplicationEnv" "internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts"Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of loadApplicationEnv to verify it maintains compatibility ast-grep --pattern 'export function loadApplicationEnv($_) { $$$ }' # Check if there are any direct imports of loadAndConvertEnv rg "import.*loadAndConvertEnv"Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the env.ts file to understand the implementation cat internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts # Check if there are any direct uses of loadAndConvertEnv besides the re-export rg -g '!index.ts' "loadAndConvertEnv"Length of output: 3530
internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import aligns with server configuration requirementsThe addition of
RequestAdapterOptionfrom vite-plugin-node is appropriate for the new server configuration functionality.
Line range hint
65-108: LGTM: Improved function naming and type safetyThe renaming from
loadAndConvertEnvtoloadApplicationEnvbetter reflects its purpose, and the explicit return type enhances type safety.
135-135: LGTM: Clean exportsThe export statement is well-organized and includes all necessary functions.
vben-admin.code-workspace (1)
7-10: LGTM! Verify the backend-nest directory structure.The new workspace folder entry is properly structured and follows the existing naming conventions.
Let's verify the directory structure:
✅ Verification successful
Directory structure verified successfully
The
apps/backend-nestdirectory exists in the repository as expected, confirming the workspace configuration is correct.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the backend-nest directory exists and contains expected files fd --type d "^backend-nest$" apps/Length of output: 55
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Verify NestJS dependencies are properly configured.The PR introduces a NestJS template, but there are no corresponding dependencies in the root package.json. While these might be defined in the workspace package, it's important to ensure they're properly configured.
Let's verify the workspace configuration and dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
NestJS dependencies are properly configured in the workspace
The backend-nest package (
apps/backend-nest/package.json) has all the necessary NestJS dependencies correctly configured:
- Core NestJS packages:
@nestjs/common,@nestjs/core,@nestjs/platform-express- Required dependencies:
reflect-metadata,rxjs- Development dependencies:
@nestjs/cliThe workspace is also properly configured with
apps/*in thepnpm-workspace.yaml, which includes the backend-nest package.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if NestJS dependencies are defined in the workspace echo "Checking workspace package.json files for NestJS dependencies..." fd -t f package.json -x rg -l "@nestjs|@vben/backend-nest" # Check if the backend-nest package is properly configured in the workspace echo "Verifying backend-nest package configuration..." fd -t f "pnpm-workspace.yaml|package.json" -x rg -l "backend-nest"Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual NestJS dependencies in the backend-nest package echo "Checking NestJS dependencies in backend-nest package..." cat apps/backend-nest/package.json # Check workspace configuration echo -e "\nChecking workspace configuration..." cat pnpm-workspace.yamlLength of output: 5716
internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (5)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement is correctly typed and necessary.The type-only import of
RequestAdapterOptionfrom vite-plugin-node is appropriate for the server configuration types being added.
86-87: LGTM: Well-documented property addition.The
noElementproperty is appropriately typed and documented, making it clear when to use this flag in server-only configurations.
170-173: LGTM: Type definition follows established patterns.The
DefineServerOptionstype maintains consistency with existing configuration patterns while adding server-specific functionality.
175-178: LGTM: Type updates maintain consistency and compatibility.The changes to
DefineConfigand exports properly integrate the new server configuration types while maintaining backward compatibility.Also applies to: 188-188, 194-194
141-154: Verify integration with NestJS template configuration.The server configuration types look good, but let's verify they support all necessary NestJS configuration options.
Also applies to: 170-173
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the NestJS configuration usage.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
ServerPluginOptions interface properly supports NestJS integration
The server configuration types align well with the NestJS implementation:
- The
portconfiguration is correctly handled through environment variables- The interface supports essential options like
adapterandappPathused in the server plugin implementation- The NestJS app bootstrap process in
apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.tsworks seamlessly with the provided configuration options🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NestJS-specific configuration patterns in the codebase echo "Checking for NestJS configuration usage..." rg -l "defineServerConfig|ServerPluginOptions" # Look for any potential missing configuration options echo "Checking for additional NestJS configuration patterns..." rg -l "createNestApp|NestFactory"Length of output: 535
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual implementation of server config and its usage echo "Checking server config implementation:" rg -A 10 "defineServerConfig" internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts echo "\nChecking NestJS app implementation:" cat apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts echo "\nChecking server plugin implementation:" rg -A 10 "ServerPluginOptions" internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.tsLength of output: 2559
internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts (1)
11-61: Function implementation is well-structured and correctThe
defineServerConfigfunction is well-structured, effectively loading environment variables, plugins, and merging configurations as expected.internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (1)
263-273: Confirm the unconditional inclusion of 'vite-plugin-node'The condition for including the
vite-plugin-nodeplugin is set totrue, meaning it will always be included. Please confirm that this is intentional and that the plugin should be active in all scenarios.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (1)
Line range hint
65-108: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the renamed function.The function renaming and type improvements enhance code clarity. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the function's purpose, parameters, and return value.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Loads and converts application-specific environment variables + * @param match - Prefix to match environment variables (default: 'VITE_') + * @param confFiles - Configuration files to load (default: getConfFiles()) + * @returns Object containing parsed application configuration + */ async function loadApplicationEnv(
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production (1 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/package.json (2 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (5 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (5 hunks)
- internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (3 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production
- internal/vite-config/package.json
- internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (9)
internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.The new type imports support the server configuration functionality while maintaining type safety.
137-137: LGTM! Exports are properly updated.The exports correctly reflect the available functionality, maintaining a clean public API.
109-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify port conflicts and add adapter validation.
The implementation looks good, but there are two potential issues to consider:
- The server port (line 129) uses the same environment variable
VITE_PORTas the application config. This could lead to port conflicts when running both server and application.- The adapter value (line 124) should be validated against supported values.
Consider these improvements:
- VITE_PORT, + VITE_SERVER_PORT,- port: getNumber(VITE_PORT, 5173), + port: getNumber(VITE_SERVER_PORT, 3000),+ const VALID_ADAPTERS = ['nest', 'express', 'fastify'] as const; + type ValidAdapter = typeof VALID_ADAPTERS[number]; + + function isValidAdapter(adapter: string): adapter is ValidAdapter { + return VALID_ADAPTERS.includes(adapter as ValidAdapter); + } + return { - adapter: getString(VITE_ADAPTER, 'nest') as RequestAdapterOption, + adapter: (() => { + const value = getString(VITE_ADAPTER, 'nest'); + if (!isValidAdapter(value)) { + throw new Error(`Invalid adapter: ${value}. Must be one of: ${VALID_ADAPTERS.join(', ')}`); + } + return value; + })() as RequestAdapterOption,internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (6)
8-8: ImportingServerPluginOptionsThe addition of
ServerPluginOptionsallows for type-safe configuration of server-specific plugin options.
19-19: AddingvitePluginNodeImportImporting
VitePluginNodeasvitePluginNodeintegrates Node.js support within Vite, which is essential for server-side rendering and backend development.
54-54: DestructuringnoElementfrom OptionsIncluding
noElementin the options destructuring enables conditional loading of plugins based on whether element UI components are required.
57-57: Conditional Loading of Vue Plugins Based onnoElementThe condition
!noElementensures that Vue plugins are only loaded when element UI components are needed, optimizing the build by excluding unnecessary plugins whennoElementis true.
70-70: Conditional Loading of Vue DevTools PluginThe condition
!noElement && !isBuild && devtoolsensures that the Vue DevTools plugin is only included in development builds when element UI components are used and thedevtoolsoption is enabled.
245-296: IntroducingloadServerPluginsFunction for Server PluginsThe new
loadServerPluginsfunction modularizes the loading of server-specific plugins, enhancing code maintainability and configurability for server-side applications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
apps/backend-nest/.env.development (1)
1-2: Consider using English comments for better international collaboration.
The comment "端口号" could be replaced with "Port number" to maintain consistency with international development practices.
-# 端口号
+# Port number
VITE_PORT=5777Also, please document why port 5777 was chosen to help prevent potential port conflicts.
apps/backend-nest/src/routes/user.controller.ts (1)
1-1: Add API documentation decorators.
Add Swagger/OpenAPI decorators to document the endpoint for API consumers.
Add documentation:
+import { ApiTags, ApiOperation, ApiResponse } from '@nestjs/swagger';
+@ApiTags('User')
@Controller('user')
export class UserController {
+ @ApiOperation({ summary: 'Get current user information' })
+ @ApiResponse({
+ status: 200,
+ description: 'Returns the current user information',
+ type: UserResponseDto
+ })
+ @ApiResponse({ status: 401, description: 'Unauthorized' })
@Get('info')apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts (1)
9-13: Add JSDoc documentation for the module.
While the implementation is correct, adding documentation would improve maintainability.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation:
+/**
+ * Routes Module
+ *
+ * Automatically registers all controllers in the current directory
+ * that match the pattern `*.controller.ts`.
+ */
@Module({
controllers,
})
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-extraneous-class
export class RoutesModule {}apps/backend-nest/src/utils/cookie-utils.ts (2)
3-9: LGTM! Consider adding path and domain restrictions.
The implementation correctly uses secure cookie settings. However, consider adding additional security restrictions:
export function clearRefreshTokenCookie(res: Response) {
res.clearCookie('jwt', {
httpOnly: true,
sameSite: 'none',
secure: true,
+ path: '/api/auth',
+ domain: process.env.COOKIE_DOMAIN,
});
}11-18: Enhance configuration flexibility and security.
While the implementation is functionally correct, consider these improvements:
- Extract cookie configuration to environment variables:
+const COOKIE_CONFIG = {
+ name: process.env.JWT_COOKIE_NAME || 'jwt',
+ maxAge: parseInt(process.env.JWT_COOKIE_MAX_AGE) || 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000,
+ path: process.env.COOKIE_PATH || '/api/auth',
+ domain: process.env.COOKIE_DOMAIN,
+ sameSite: process.env.COOKIE_SAME_SITE || 'none',
+ secure: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production',
+ httpOnly: true,
+};
export function setRefreshTokenCookie(res: Response, refreshToken: string) {
- res.cookie('jwt', refreshToken, {
- httpOnly: true,
- maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000,
- sameSite: 'none',
- secure: true,
- });
+ res.cookie(COOKIE_CONFIG.name, refreshToken, COOKIE_CONFIG);
}- Add JSDoc documentation:
/**
* Sets a secure HTTP-only cookie containing the refresh token
* @param res - Express Response object
* @param refreshToken - JWT refresh token
*/apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts (2)
1-6: Consider adding explicit payload type definition.
The JWT strategy implementation looks good, but it would benefit from explicit type definitions for better type safety and documentation.
Add a type interface for the JWT payload:
interface JwtPayload {
sub: string;
username: string;
// add other expected payload fields
}1-18: Consider implementing a comprehensive auth module structure.
Since this is part of a new NestJS template, consider implementing a more complete auth module structure:
- Add guards:
JwtAuthGuardRolesGuardfor role-based access control
- Add decorators:
@Public()for public routes@Roles()for role-based access
- Add documentation:
- Swagger/OpenAPI annotations
- Usage examples in README
This will provide a more robust starting point for projects using this template.
Would you like me to help generate these additional components and documentation?
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.module.ts (2)
18-19: Remove unnecessary eslint-disable comment
The eslint-disable comment for @typescript-eslint/no-extraneous-class is unnecessary as AuthModule is a valid NestJS module class serving as a module definition.
-// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-extraneous-class
export class AuthModule {}16-16: Consider exporting the providers
If these authentication services and strategies need to be used by other modules, consider adding them to the exports array of the module decorator.
imports: [/*...*/],
providers: [AuthService, LocalStrategy, JwtStrategy],
+ exports: [AuthService],apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts (2)
5-5: Consider using explicit file paths for imports.
Instead of importing from ./index.service, consider using the explicit file path (e.g., ./auth.service or similar) to improve code maintainability and make the codebase easier to navigate.
9-9: Follow TypeScript naming conventions for parameters.
The parameter AuthService should be in camelCase as per TypeScript conventions.
- constructor(private readonly AuthService: AuthService) {
+ constructor(private readonly authService: AuthService) {apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts (1)
31-35: Add startup logging and environment information.
The bootstrap process should log important information about the application's environment and configuration to assist with deployment verification and debugging.
export async function bootstrap() {
const app = await useApp();
+ const port = import.meta.env.VITE_PORT;
+ const nodeEnv = import.meta.env.MODE || 'development';
- await app.listen(import.meta.env.VITE_PORT);
+ await app.listen(port);
+ console.log(`
+ 🚀 Server running on port ${port}
+ 📝 Environment: ${nodeEnv}
+ ⚡ Nest application initialized
+ `);
}apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.ts (1)
13-28: Improve type definitions and documentation
- The cookie value types are too permissive with
any - The JSDoc comment for
secretis in Chinese
Apply these improvements:
declare global {
export namespace Express {
export interface Request {
/**
- * 请求密钥
- * [可选] 如果向`cookie-parser`传递了密钥，则此属性将包含密钥。
- * 可以被其他中间件使用
+ * Request secret key
+ * [Optional] If a secret was provided to `cookie-parser`, this property will contain that secret.
+ * Can be used by other middleware
*/
secret?: string | undefined;
- /** 解析尚未签名的cookie */
- cookies: Record<string, any>;
- /** 解析已签名的cookie */
- signedCookies: Record<string, any>;
+ /** Parsed unsigned cookies */
+ cookies: Record<string, string | undefined>;
+ /** Parsed signed cookies */
+ signedCookies: Record<string, string | undefined>;
}
}
}apps/backend-nest/src/guards/auth.guard.ts (2)
1-7: Consider consolidating imports and making the public key more specific.
The implementation is correct, but could be improved for maintainability.
Apply these changes:
-import type { Reflector } from '@nestjs/core';
-
-import { type ExecutionContext, Injectable, SetMetadata } from '@nestjs/common';
+import { type ExecutionContext, Injectable, SetMetadata } from '@nestjs/common';
+import { type Reflector } from '@nestjs/core';
import { AuthGuard } from '@nestjs/passport';
-const IS_PUBLIC_KEY = 'isPublic';
+const JWT_AUTH_PUBLIC_KEY = 'jwtAuthPublic';
-export const Public = () => SetMetadata(IS_PUBLIC_KEY, true);
+export const Public = () => SetMetadata(JWT_AUTH_PUBLIC_KEY, true);29-30: Consider named exports and English documentation.
The default export works but could be improved:
- Use English comments for better international collaboration
- Consider using named exports for better maintainability and refactoring support
-// 默认导出，便于glob导入
-export default JwtAuthGuard;
+// Export for glob imports in the application
+export { JwtAuthGuard };apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts (1)
85-90: Improve type declaration and remove eslint disable.
The global type declaration can be improved:
- The eslint disable comment can be removed by properly typing the interface
- Consider adding more specific user properties for Express context
declare global {
namespace Express {
interface User extends Omit<UserInfo, 'password'> {
// Add Express-specific properties
authToken?: string;
tokenExpiration?: Date;
}
}
}apps/backend-nest/src/utils/mock-data.ts (1)
173-186: Add type definitions for menu configuration.
The mock menus structure would benefit from explicit type definitions.
+interface UserMenuConfig {
+ menus: MenuItem[];
+ username: string;
+}
-export const MOCK_MENUS = [
+export const MOCK_MENUS: UserMenuConfig[] = [📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/guards/auth.guard.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/guards/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/user.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/utils/cookie-utils.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/backend-nest/src/utils/mock-data.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/backend-nest/.env.production
- apps/backend-nest/package.json
- apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts
🔇 Additional comments (15)
apps/backend-nest/.env.development (1)
4-5: LGTM! Good choice enabling SWC for development.
Enabling SWC in development environment will improve build performance.
apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/index.ts (1)
8-8: Verify the Cookies import path and usage.
The Cookies import seems to be used for authentication purposes based on the AI summary.
Let's verify the Cookies implementation and its usage:
✅ Verification successful
The Cookies import and implementation are correctly used for authentication
The verification shows that:
- The Cookies decorator is properly implemented in
cookies.tsas a param decorator - It's correctly used in
auth.controller.tsfor handling JWT refresh tokens in authentication endpoints:logoutendpoint:@Cookies('jwt')refreshendpoint:@Cookies('jwt')
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Cookies implementation and its usage in authentication
# Check the Cookies implementation
echo "Checking Cookies implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*Cookies" "./apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.ts"
# Check Cookies usage in auth-related files
echo "Checking Cookies usage in auth:"
rg -l "Cookies" "./apps/backend-nest/src/**/*auth*"
Length of output: 662
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Cookies usage across the codebase more broadly
echo "Checking all files using Cookies:"
rg -l "Cookies" --type ts
# Check for actual usage of the Cookies decorator
echo -e "\nChecking Cookies decorator usage:"
rg "@Cookies\(" --type ts -A 2
# Check for cookie-related authentication code
echo -e "\nChecking cookie-related auth patterns:"
rg -i "cookie.*auth|auth.*cookie" --type ts
Length of output: 1040
apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports with proper type imports.
The import statement follows TypeScript best practices by using the type modifier for type imports.
3-7: Verify controller file naming and export patterns.
Let's ensure all controller files follow the correct naming convention and export pattern.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the controller files.
Controller files follow correct naming and export patterns
Both controller files (auth.controller.ts and user.controller.ts) follow the correct naming convention and properly export their controller classes:
- Files end with
.controller.ts - Each file has a default export of a class decorated with
@Controller - Classes follow the naming convention with
Controllersuffix
The dynamic import in index.ts will work correctly with these files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify controller file naming and export patterns
# Check for controller files that don't follow the naming convention
echo "Checking for controller files that don't follow the naming convention..."
fd --type f --full-path "apps/backend-nest/src/routes" --exec sh -c '
for file in "$@"; do
if [[ $file =~ .*controller\.[jt]s$ ]]; then
# Check if the file has a default export
if ! rg -q "export default class.*Controller" "$file"; then
echo "Warning: $file might be missing a default export of a controller class"
fi
fi
done
' sh
Length of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all controller files and their content
echo "Controller files in routes directory:"
fd "controller.ts$" "apps/backend-nest/src/routes"
echo -e "\nChecking controller file contents:"
fd "controller.ts$" "apps/backend-nest/src/routes" -x cat {}
Length of output: 2789
apps/backend-nest/src/guards/index.ts (3)
5-8: Consider using a more specific import pattern.
The current glob pattern ./*.guard.ts only matches guard files in the current directory. If you plan to organize guards in subdirectories, consider using ./**/*.guard.ts instead.
Let's check if there are any nested guard files that might be missed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for guard files in subdirectories that would be missed by the current pattern
fd --type f --regex '.*\.guard\.ts$' apps/backend-nest/src/guards/ -d 215-15: Verify the Public decorator implementation.
The Public decorator is re-exported from auth.guard, but we should verify its implementation to ensure it properly marks routes as public.
Let's check the implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of the Public decorator
ast-grep --pattern 'export const Public = $$$'10-13: Verify the impact of global guards.
The setup registers all guards globally using APP_GUARD. This means they will run for every request unless explicitly marked with @Public(). Ensure this is the intended behavior.
Let's check for routes that might need public access:
✅ Verification successful
Global guards are correctly implemented with proper public route handling
The verification shows that the global guard setup is appropriate:
- Only the login route is marked with
@Public()decorator, which is the expected behavior for authentication - Other routes in
auth.controller.ts(logout, refresh) and all routes inuser.controller.tsare protected - The
JwtAuthGuardproperly implements the public route bypass using theIS_PUBLIC_KEYmetadata
The current implementation follows security best practices by protecting all routes by default and explicitly marking public endpoints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for controller routes that might need public access (e.g., login, register)
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@$_("$_")
$_($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for controller routes and their decorators
rg "@(Controller|Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch)\(.*\)" -A 2
# Look for @Public decorator usage
rg "@Public\(\)" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for all guard files to understand the protection scope
fd "\.guard\.ts$" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2452
apps/backend-nest/src/utils/cookie-utils.ts (1)
6-6: Verify the necessity of 'sameSite: none'.
Setting sameSite: 'none' allows cross-origin cookies, which should only be used if the frontend and API are on different domains.
Also applies to: 15-15
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient evidence:
sameSite: none setting is necessary - keep it
The codebase shows clear evidence of a cross-origin setup:
- Multiple frontend apps (web-antd, web-naive, web-ele) configure separate API URLs via
VITE_GLOB_API_URL - Backend has CORS enabled (
app.enableCors()in backend-nest) - Mock backend explicitly allows cross-origin requests with
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: '*'
This architecture confirms the frontend and API are designed to run on different domains, making sameSite: none necessary for cookies to work properly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the frontend and backend are on different domains
echo "Checking for frontend origin configuration..."
rg -l "VITE_API_URL|FRONTEND_URL|CORS_ORIGIN" --type env
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for environment configuration files with any extension
echo "Searching for environment configuration files..."
fd -e .env -e .env.example -e .env.sample -e env
# Search for CORS configuration in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for CORS configuration..."
rg -i "cors|origin" --type ts -A 3
# Search for API URL configuration in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for API URL configuration..."
rg -i "api.*url|frontend.*url" --type ts -A 3
Length of output: 9389
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts (1)
15-17:
Add payload validation and type safety.
The current validate method lacks type safety and payload validation, which could lead to runtime errors.
Implement proper validation and typing:
- async validate(payload: any) {
- return { ...payload };
+ async validate(payload: JwtPayload): Promise<JwtPayload> {
+ if (!payload.sub || !payload.username) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid token payload');
+ }
+ return payload;
}Also, consider adding:
- Logging for failed validations
- User existence verification against your database
- Additional claims validation if required (roles, permissions, etc.)
Let's check if there are any user-related interfaces or types defined in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed due to incorrect file type specification. Let's try with the correct extension and also expand our search to include JWT-related types and existing strategy implementations to better understand the context.
The previous output shows we have UserInfo interfaces and a LocalStrategy implementation. Let's gather more context about the JWT payload structure and authentication-related types to provide a more accurate recommendation.
Add type safety and validation to JWT payload
- async validate(payload: any) {
- return { ...payload };
+ async validate(payload: UserInfo): Promise<Omit<UserInfo, 'password'>> {
+ if (!payload.username || !payload.id || !Array.isArray(payload.roles)) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid token payload');
+ }
+ const { password, ...userInfo } = payload;
+ return userInfo;
}- The
UserInfointerface is already defined in the auth service - Following the pattern in
jwt-utils.ts, we exclude the password from the returned payload - Added validation for required fields: username, id, and roles array
- Properly typed the return value to exclude the password field
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for user-related interfaces and types
rg -t typescript "interface.*User|type.*User"
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for user-related interfaces and types with correct file extension
rg "interface.*User|type.*User" --type ts
# Search for JWT related types and interfaces
rg "interface.*Jwt|type.*Jwt|interface.*Token|type.*Token" --type ts
# Look for existing validate method implementations in strategy files
fd ".*strategy\.ts$" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 3910
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the auth service and related files for the JWT payload structure
cat apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts
# Check if there are any JWT-related utilities
fd "jwt.*\.(ts|js)$" --exec cat {}
# Look for any auth-related DTOs or interfaces
rg -t ts "class.*Dto|interface.*Auth|type.*Auth" -A 5
Length of output: 5175
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.module.ts (1)
1-8: Verify the strategy implementations
The module imports both LocalStrategy and JwtStrategy, but we need to ensure they are properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the authentication implementation to ensure completeness.
Both strategies are properly implemented with correct authentication flows
The verification shows that both strategies are correctly implemented:
- LocalStrategy properly extends PassportStrategy with username/password validation
- JwtStrategy is configured correctly with bearer token extraction and payload validation
- AuthService implements the required validateUser method and JWT token generation
A few minor observations:
- Using mock users and hardcoded secrets (marked as TODO)
- Proper typing for user information with UserInfo interface
- Correct JWT token generation with appropriate expiration times
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the strategy files exist and contain proper implementations
echo "Checking strategy implementations..."
# Check LocalStrategy
rg -A 10 "class LocalStrategy" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts
# Check JwtStrategy
rg -A 10 "class JwtStrategy" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts
# Verify AuthService implementation
rg -A 10 "class AuthService" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts
Length of output: 1265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper imports and setup in the strategy files
echo "Checking strategy imports and setup..."
# Check LocalStrategy imports and full implementation
cat apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts
# Check JwtStrategy imports and full implementation
cat apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts
# Check AuthService full implementation for validation method
cat apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts
Length of output: 3236
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts (1)
13-21: Verify security measures in AuthService implementation.
Since this strategy handles authentication, ensure that:
- Password comparison in
validateUseruses secure methods (e.g., bcrypt) - No sensitive information is leaked in the returned user object
- Rate limiting is implemented to prevent brute force attacks
apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.ts (1)
5-5: Verify the path alias configuration.
The #/ path alias needs to be properly configured in the TypeScript and build configuration files to prevent module resolution issues.
✅ Verification successful
Path alias #/ is properly configured
The path alias #/ is correctly configured in the project:
- Found in
apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.jsonwith proper path mapping:"#/*": ["./src/*"] - Consistently used across multiple applications in the monorepo
- Alias configuration follows the standard TypeScript path mapping pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the path alias is configured in tsconfig
rg -l "paths.*#/" --type json
# Check if the alias is properly handled in build config
rg -l "alias.*#/" --type typescript --type javascript
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for tsconfig files and their content
fd -e json tsconfig && fd -e json tsconfig | xargs cat
# Check for any build configuration files
fd -e js -e cjs -e mjs 'vite|webpack|rollup|babel|esbuild' && fd -e js -e cjs -e mjs 'vite|webpack|rollup|babel|esbuild' | xargs cat
# Check the actual usage of the #/ alias in the codebase
rg -l "#/"
Length of output: 14769
apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.ts (2)
1-28: Verify integration with authentication system
Since this is a security-sensitive component handling cookies, please ensure:
- It's properly integrated with the JWT authentication system mentioned in the PR
- Cookie settings align with the authentication requirements (expiration, secure flags, etc.)
✅ Verification successful
Cookie handling is properly integrated with authentication system
The cookie implementation is securely integrated with the JWT authentication system:
- JWT refresh tokens are stored in HTTP-only cookies with proper security settings:
httpOnly: trueprevents JavaScript accesssecure: trueensures HTTPS-only transmissionsameSite: 'none'configured for cross-origin requests- 24-hour expiration via
maxAge
- The
Cookiesdecorator is correctly used in auth endpoints for refresh token handling - Cookie operations are centralized in
cookie-utils.tswith consistent security settings - Proper cookie cleanup is implemented in logout and token refresh flows
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT and cookie usage patterns in auth-related files
echo "Checking JWT token storage in cookies..."
rg -A 5 "jwt.*cookie|cookie.*jwt" --type ts
echo "Checking cookie security configurations..."
rg -A 5 "cookie.*secure|cookie.*httpOnly|cookie.*sameSite" --type ts
Length of output: 701
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the cookie-utils.ts file more thoroughly
echo "Checking cookie-utils.ts content..."
cat apps/backend-nest/src/utils/cookie-utils.ts
# Let's also check where this cookie utility is being used
echo -e "\nChecking usage of cookie-utils..."
rg -l "cookie-utils" --type ts
# Check for any auth-related imports or usage of the Cookies decorator
echo -e "\nChecking usage of Cookies decorator..."
rg "import.*Cookies.*from" --type ts
rg "@Cookies" --type ts
Length of output: 1323
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the auth controller to understand the complete authentication flow
echo "Checking auth.controller.ts content..."
cat apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts
# Let's also check if there are any security-related configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for security configurations..."
rg -l "SecurityConfig|CookieOptions|cookie.*config" --type ts
Length of output: 2459
1-4:
Configure cookie-parser with secure options
The default export of cookie-parser without options may expose the application to security vulnerabilities. Consider configuring it with secure options.
Apply this diff to enhance security:
-export default cookieParser();
+export default cookieParser({
+ // Mitigate parsing unexpected objects in cookies
+ verify: (req, res, buf) => {
+ try {
+ JSON.parse(buf);
+ } catch (e) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid cookie');
+ }
+ }
+});Also consider adding these options based on your requirements:
secret: for signed cookiessecure: to ensure cookies only sent over HTTPShttpOnly: to prevent XSS attacks
apps/backend-nest/src/guards/auth.guard.ts (1)
1-30: Verify JWT strategy configuration and guard usage.
Please ensure:
- The JWT strategy is properly configured in the auth module
- The guard is correctly applied at the application level or controller level
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the JWT configuration and usage.
Let me check the JWT strategy implementation to complete the verification.
JWT authentication implementation is properly configured
The verification shows a complete and secure JWT authentication setup:
- JWT strategy is correctly implemented with proper token extraction and validation
- JwtModule is registered with a secret key
- Guard is globally registered via APP_GUARD provider
- Public decorator is being used in auth.controller.ts for unprotected routes
- All necessary dependencies (passport-jwt, @nestjs/passport) are properly imported
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT strategy configuration
echo "Checking JWT strategy configuration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $strategy implements $_ {
$$$
validate($jwt) {
$$$
}
}'
# Check for guard usage in main.ts or app.module.ts
echo "Checking guard usage..."
rg -l "JwtAuthGuard" "apps/backend-nest/src/"
Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT strategy and module configuration
echo "Checking JWT strategy and module setup..."
rg -A 10 "JwtModule" "apps/backend-nest/src/"
# Check for global guard setup in main.ts
echo "Checking global guard setup..."
rg -A 5 "useGlobalGuards|APP_GUARD" "apps/backend-nest/src/"
# Check for Public decorator usage
echo "Checking Public decorator usage..."
rg "Public\(\)" "apps/backend-nest/src/"
# Look for passport-jwt related imports
echo "Checking passport-jwt configuration..."
rg "passport-jwt" "apps/backend-nest/src/"
Length of output: 2608
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT strategy implementation
echo "Checking JWT strategy implementation..."
cat "apps/backend-nest/src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts"
# Check if the guard is properly imported in the module
echo "Checking guard registration..."
rg -A 5 "JwtAuthGuard" "apps/backend-nest/src/guards/index.ts"
Length of output: 753
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts (2)
1-17: Add OpenAPI documentation.
The endpoint lacks API documentation which is crucial for API consumers.
Add Swagger decorators to document the endpoint:
+import { ApiOperation, ApiQuery, ApiResponse } from '@nestjs/swagger';
@Controller()
export class StatusController {
+ @ApiOperation({ summary: 'Check system status' })
+ @ApiQuery({ name: 'status', type: Number, description: 'HTTP status code to return' })
+ @ApiResponse({ status: 200, description: 'Status check successful' })
+ @ApiResponse({ status: 400, description: 'Invalid status code provided' })
@Get('status')
public status(...)1-17: Add unit tests for the status endpoint.
The controller lacks unit tests to verify its behavior.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for this controller? The tests should cover:
- Valid status codes
- Invalid status codes
- Error handling
- Input validation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts (1)
1-17: Verify the impact on existing health checks.
This new status endpoint might conflict with existing health check mechanisms.
Let's check for existing health check implementations:
✅ Verification successful
No conflict with health checks found
Based on the verification results:
- No health check modules (@nestjs/terminus) are installed or configured
- No other status endpoints exist in the NestJS application
- The only similar endpoint is in the mock backend which serves a different purpose
The new status endpoint is safe to implement as it doesn't interfere with any existing health check mechanisms.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing health check endpoints
echo "Searching for health check related files..."
rg -l "health|status" --type ts
# Search for NestJS health modules
echo "Checking for @nestjs/terminus usage..."
rg -l "@nestjs/terminus"
Length of output: 1000
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of relevant files to understand health check implementations
# Check the content of the status endpoint in backend-mock
echo "=== Content of backend-mock status endpoint ==="
cat apps/backend-mock/api/status.ts
# Check for any health or status related configurations in NestJS app
echo -e "\n=== NestJS health/status related configurations ==="
rg -l "HealthModule|TerminusModule" --type ts
# Look for other status endpoints in the NestJS app
echo -e "\n=== Status endpoints in NestJS app ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@$_("status")
$$$
}'
# Check package.json for health-related dependencies
echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json for health dependencies ==="
cat package.json | grep -i "health\|terminus"
Length of output: 804
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts (3)
13-16: Add JSDoc documentation for better code clarity.The implementation is good, but adding documentation would improve maintainability and help other developers understand the purpose and usage of this interceptor.
+/** + * Transforms the response data into a standardized ResponseClass format. + * @template T The type of data being transformed + */ @Injectable() export class TransformInterceptor<T> implements NestInterceptor<T, ResponseClass<T>>
17-22: Consider adding error handling and logging.While the basic transformation works, consider these improvements for better robustness:
- Add error handling for the transformation process
- Include logging for debugging purposes
intercept( _: ExecutionContext, next: CallHandler, ): Observable<ResponseClass<T>> { - return next.handle().pipe(map((data) => ResponseClass.Success(data))); + return next.handle().pipe( + map((data) => { + // Add logging for debugging + console.debug('TransformInterceptor - Transforming response:', data); + return ResponseClass.Success(data); + }), + catchError((error) => { + console.error('TransformInterceptor - Error:', error); + throw error; + }) + ); }Don't forget to add the following import:
import { catchError } from 'rxjs/operators';
1-23: Consider integration testing and documentation.This interceptor plays a crucial role in maintaining consistent API responses. Consider:
- Adding integration tests to verify behavior with various response types
- Documenting usage examples in the project's API documentation
- Adding examples of how this interceptor works with other NestJS features (Guards, Pipes, etc.)
Would you like me to help create:
- Integration tests for this interceptor?
- Documentation with usage examples?
apps/backend-nest/src/interfaces/response.ts (4)
1-8: Enhance type safety and add documentation.Consider the following improvements:
- Define a specific error type instead of using
any- Add validation for the code parameter
- Add JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose and parameters
+/** + * Standardized API response wrapper + * @template T - Type of the response data + */ export class ResponseClass<T = any> { + /** + * @param code - Response status code (0 for success, -1 for error) + * @param data - Response payload + * @param error - Error details if any + * @param message - Response message or array of messages + */ constructor( public code: number, public data: T, - public error: any, + public error: Error | null, public message: string | string[], - ) {} + ) { + if (![0, -1].includes(code)) { + throw new Error('Invalid response code. Use 0 for success or -1 for error'); + } + }
9-11: Improve error handling consistency.The error method could be enhanced with better parameter validation and error handling.
- static Error(message: string | string[], error: any = null) { - return new ResponseClass(-1, null, error, message); + static Error(message: string | string[], error?: Error) { + if (!message || (Array.isArray(message) && message.length === 0)) { + throw new Error('Message is required for error responses'); + } + return new ResponseClass(-1, null, error || null, message); }
35-38: Make success message customizable for consistency.The Success method should allow message customization like PageSuccess does.
- static Success<T = null>(data: T) { - return new ResponseClass(0, data, null, 'ok'); + static Success<T = null>(data: T, { message = 'ok' } = {}) { + return new ResponseClass(0, data, null, message); }
1-49: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.
- Define interfaces for response types:
interface IApiResponse<T> { code: number; data: T; error: Error | null; message: string | string[]; } interface IPaginatedResponse<T> { items: T[]; total: number; }
- Add logging for better observability, especially for error cases
- Consider implementing response caching for paginated responses
- Add metrics collection for monitoring response patterns
These improvements would enhance maintainability and observability of the API responses.
apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts (2)
16-16: Remove unnecessary ESLint disable commentThe ESLint disable comment on line 16 is unnecessary since there is no 'throw new Error' statement following it. Removing this comment will keep the code clean and maintainable.
- // eslint-disable-next-line unicorn/throw-new-error const result = ResponseClass.Error(results.message);
14-17: Improve variable naming for clarityThe variables
resultsandresultare similarly named, which can cause confusion. Renaming them toexceptionResponseanderrorResponserespectively can enhance readability.- const results = exception.getResponse() as ExceptionResponse; - const result = ResponseClass.Error(results.message); + const exceptionResponse = exception.getResponse() as ExceptionResponse; + const errorResponse = ResponseClass.Error(exceptionResponse.message);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interfaces/response.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts (1)
1-11: Verify the import alias configuration.
The import path alias # is used in '#/interfaces/response'. Ensure that this alias is properly configured in your TypeScript and build configuration files.
✅ Verification successful
The # import alias is properly configured
The import alias # is correctly configured in the project's TypeScript configuration. The apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json file includes the path mapping:
"paths": {
"#/*": ["./src/*"]
}This confirms that the import statement import { ResponseClass } from '#/interfaces/response' is using a valid path alias that resolves to files under the src directory.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import alias configuration
# Check tsconfig.json for path alias configuration
echo "Checking TypeScript configuration for '#' alias..."
rg -l "\"#\"" --type json
# Check for other files using this alias pattern
echo "Checking other files using '#' alias..."
rg "from '#/" --type typescript
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the import alias configuration
# Check for tsconfig files with different extensions
echo "Checking for TypeScript configuration files..."
fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig
# Check the content of any tsconfig files for path mappings
echo "Checking path mappings in tsconfig files..."
fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig -x cat {}
# Check for files using the '#' import pattern with ripgrep
# Using --type-add to define typescript files
echo "Checking files using '#' import pattern..."
rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts "from '[\"']#/"
Length of output: 10364
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/index.ts (1)
5-8: Consider enhancing type safety for interceptor imports.While the current type assertion works, it could be more specific to ensure that only valid interceptor classes are imported.
Consider this improvement:
-const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type>('./*.interceptor.ts', { +interface NestInterceptor { + intercept(...args: any[]): any; +} +const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type<NestInterceptor>>('./*.interceptor.ts', { import: 'default', eager: true, });apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (2)
9-12: Consider documenting middleware configuration.The module spreads arrays of guards, interceptors, and filters into providers. Consider adding documentation to explain the order of execution and purpose of each middleware component.
+/** + * Main application module that configures: + * - Routes and authentication through module imports + * - Global guards for authorization + * - Global interceptors for request/response transformation + * - Global filters for error handling + */ @Module({ imports: [RoutesModule, AuthModule], providers: [...guards, ...interceptors, ...filters], })
13-14: Document the reason for empty class or consider alternatives.The ESLint suppression suggests this empty class is intentional, but it would be better to either:
- Document why an empty class is necessary
- Consider using a more idiomatic NestJS pattern
-// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-extraneous-class +/** + * Root application module. + * Empty class is required by NestJS for module declaration. + * All functionality is configured through the @Module decorator. + */ export class AppModule {}apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts (1)
36-36: Remove redundant default export.The controller is already exported as a named export. Having both named and default exports can lead to confusion and inconsistency in import statements. NestJS conventionally uses named exports.
-export default UserController;apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts (3)
1-12: Consider improving import organization and path aliasing.While the imports are functionally correct, consider:
- Grouping external (NestJS, RxJS) and internal (interfaces) imports
- Using more explicit path aliases instead of '#/' for better maintainability
import type { CallHandler, ExecutionContext, NestInterceptor, } from '@nestjs/common'; import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; import { Reflector } from '@nestjs/core'; import { Observable } from 'rxjs'; import { map } from 'rxjs/operators'; -import { ResponseClass, SkipResCheck } from '#/interfaces/response'; +import { ResponseClass, SkipResCheck } from '@/interfaces/response';
37-38: Translate and improve the comment documentation.The Chinese comment should be translated to English and provide more context about the glob import usage.
-// 默认导出，便于glob导入 +// Default export to facilitate automatic module registration via glob imports export default TransformInterceptor;
1-38: Consider documenting global interceptor registration.Since this is a response transformation interceptor that standardizes API responses, it should typically be registered globally. Consider adding setup instructions in the README or module documentation:
// app.module.ts import { APP_INTERCEPTOR } from '@nestjs/core'; import { TransformInterceptor } from './interceptor/transform.interceptor'; @Module({ providers: [ { provide: APP_INTERCEPTOR, useClass: TransformInterceptor, }, ], }) export class AppModule {}apps/backend-nest/package.json (2)
2-7: Add missing package metadataPlease add:
- A meaningful description that explains the package's purpose
- Author information for maintenance purposes
15-17: Consider adding more NestJS-specific import aliasesWhile the current import alias is good, consider adding more common NestJS paths for better code organization.
"imports": { "#/*": "./src/*" + "#/common/*": "./src/common/*", + "#/config/*": "./src/config/*", + "#/modules/*": "./src/modules/*", + "#/types/*": "./src/types/*" }apps/backend-nest/src/interfaces/response.ts (1)
39-41: Adjust the default generic type parameter 'T' to 'any' for flexibilityDefaulting the generic type parameter
Ttonullin theSuccessmethod may lead to type constraints that prevent passing actual data. It's more conventional to defaultTtoanyor omit the default to allow flexibility in the data type.Apply this diff to update the default generic type parameter:
- static Success<T = null>(data: T) { + static Success<T = any>(data: T) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
apps/backend-nest/package.json(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/filters/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/guards/auth.guard.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interfaces/response.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.module.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/guards/auth.guard.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/backend-nest/src/filters/index.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-structured and necessary.
The type imports and the APP_FILTER token are correctly imported from their respective NestJS packages.
1-13: Consider documenting the dynamic filter registration pattern.
While the dynamic registration approach is elegant and reduces boilerplate, it makes it less obvious which filters are active in the application. Consider:
- Adding documentation about this pattern in the project's developer guide
- Creating a debug log during application startup that lists all registered filters
- Adding unit tests to verify the registration mechanism
Let's check for existing documentation about this pattern:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any documentation mentioning filters or dynamic registration
rg -i "filter|dynamic.*registration" "README.md" "docs/"5-8: Consider enhancing the glob configuration for better maintainability and type safety.
While the current implementation works, consider these improvements:
- The glob pattern could be expanded to include subdirectories (
'./**/*.filter.ts') for better organization - Type safety could be strengthened by adding a type guard or validation
-const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type>('./*.filter.ts', {
+const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type>('./**/*.filter.ts', {
import: 'default',
eager: true,
});Let's check if there are any filter files in subdirectories that might be missed:
apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/index.ts (1)
10-13: LGTM! Verify all interceptor files follow the naming convention.
The implementation correctly sets up global interceptors using the APP_INTERCEPTOR token. The approach is modular and follows NestJS best practices.
Let's verify that all interceptor files follow the .interceptor.ts naming convention and export a default class:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the interceptor files.
All interceptor files follow the naming convention and structure correctly
The verification shows:
- All interceptor files follow the
.interceptor.tsnaming convention in kebab-case - The interceptor file properly exports a default class that implements
NestInterceptor - The implementation follows NestJS best practices with proper decorators and typing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify interceptor file naming and structure
# Test 1: Check for files that don't follow the naming convention
echo "Checking for interceptor files not following the naming convention..."
fd --type f . apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor -x sh -c '
if [[ "{}" =~ interceptor\.ts$ ]]; then
if ! [[ $(basename "{}") =~ ^[a-z-]+\.interceptor\.ts$ ]]; then
echo "Warning: {} does not follow kebab-case.interceptor.ts naming convention"
fi
fi
'
# Test 2: Verify each interceptor file has a default export
echo "Checking for default exports in interceptor files..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export default class $_ implements $_ { $$$ }' apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/*.interceptor.ts
Length of output: 703
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the interceptor directory
echo "Files in interceptor directory:"
fd . apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor
# Check content of interceptor files
echo -e "\nInterceptor file contents:"
for file in $(fd --type f . apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor); do
echo -e "\n=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
Length of output: 2118
apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (2)
1-14: Verify global middleware registration.
The spread operators suggest these middleware components will be registered globally. We should verify that this is the intended behavior and that the components are properly configured for global use.
Consider using NestJS's APP_* tokens from @nestjs/core for global middleware if not already implemented:
import { APP_GUARD, APP_INTERCEPTOR, APP_FILTER } from '@nestjs/core';✅ Verification successful
Global middleware is properly configured using NestJS's APP_ tokens*
The middleware components are correctly configured for global use through the recommended approach using APP_GUARD, APP_INTERCEPTOR, and APP_FILTER tokens from @nestjs/core. The index files in guards, interceptors, and filters directories properly set up global providers using these tokens, which is the best practice for registering global middleware in NestJS applications.
The spread operators in the AppModule are working with arrays of properly configured global providers, exactly as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for global middleware configuration
echo "Checking guard configurations..."
rg -A 5 "@Injectable|@Global" --type typescript $(fd -e ts "guards/")
echo "Checking interceptor configurations..."
rg -A 5 "@Injectable|@Global" --type typescript $(fd -e ts "interceptor/")
echo "Checking filter configurations..."
rg -A 5 "@Injectable|@Global" --type typescript $(fd -e ts "filters/")
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the middleware configurations
# First, let's find the guard files and their content
echo "=== Guards ==="
fd -e ts . "guards" --exec cat {}
echo -e "\n=== Interceptors ==="
fd -e ts . "interceptor" --exec cat {}
echo -e "\n=== Filters ==="
fd -e ts . "filters" --exec cat {}
# Also check if APP_* tokens are being used
echo -e "\n=== APP_* Token Usage ==="
rg "APP_(GUARD|INTERCEPTOR|FILTER)" -A 3
Length of output: 2061
1-8: Verify path alias configuration.
The imports use the '#/' alias prefix. We should verify that this alias is properly configured in the TypeScript and build configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Path aliases and imports are correctly configured
The verification shows that:
- The
#/*path alias is properly configured in the backend-nest's tsconfig.json - All imported modules exist with their respective index.ts files:
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.tsapps/backend-nest/src/filters/index.tsapps/backend-nest/src/guards/index.tsapps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/index.tsapps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.ts
Each module directory contains the necessary implementation files, confirming that the imports are valid and the module structure is well-organized.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TypeScript configuration for path aliases
echo "Checking for path alias configuration..."
rg -l "paths.*#" --type json
rg -l "paths.*#" --type typescript
# Check for actual files referenced by imports
echo "Verifying imported files exist..."
fd -e ts "auth/index" "filters/index" "guards/index" "interceptor/index" "routes/index"
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the path aliases and imports
# Check for tsconfig files
echo "Checking tsconfig files..."
fd tsconfig
# Check content of found tsconfig files
echo "\nChecking path mappings in tsconfig files..."
fd tsconfig -x cat {}
# Check if the imported modules exist
echo "\nChecking for module files..."
fd -t f -e ts "(auth|filters|guards|interceptor|routes)"
# Look for barrel files
echo "\nChecking for index files in these modules..."
fd -t f "index.ts" -d 2
Length of output: 11299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check specifically for the imported modules in the backend-nest directory
echo "Checking for module files in backend-nest..."
fd -t f -e ts "^index\.ts$" apps/backend-nest/src/auth
fd -t f -e ts "^index\.ts$" apps/backend-nest/src/filters
fd -t f -e ts "^index\.ts$" apps/backend-nest/src/guards
fd -t f -e ts "^index\.ts$" apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor
fd -t f -e ts "^index\.ts$" apps/backend-nest/src/routes
# Let's also check the content of these directories
echo "\nListing contents of relevant directories..."
ls -R apps/backend-nest/src/auth 2>/dev/null || true
ls -R apps/backend-nest/src/filters 2>/dev/null || true
ls -R apps/backend-nest/src/guards 2>/dev/null || true
ls -R apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor 2>/dev/null || true
ls -R apps/backend-nest/src/routes 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 1269
apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts (3)
1-8: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between external and internal dependencies.
9-11:
Fix naming convention and add strategy configuration.
- The injected service should follow camelCase naming convention
- The strategy configuration is missing important options
Apply this diff:
- constructor(private readonly AuthService: AuthService) {
+ constructor(private readonly authService: AuthService) {
super({
+ usernameField: 'username',
+ passwordField: 'password',
});
}13-21:
Improve error handling and type safety.
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Using
ForbiddenException(403) for authentication failure is incorrect. UseUnauthorizedException(401) instead. - Return type
anyshould be replaced with a specific type - Variable name
findUsercould be more descriptive
Apply this diff:
- async validate(username: string, password: string): Promise<any> {
- const findUser = await this.AuthService.validateUser(username, password);
+ async validate(username: string, password: string): Promise<User> {
+ const user = await this.authService.validateUser(username, password);
- if (!findUser) {
- throw new ForbiddenException('用户名或密码错误');
+ if (!user) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid credentials');
}
- return findUser;
+ return user;
}Note: Replace User with your actual user interface/type.
✅ Verification successful
Improve error handling and type safety in local authentication strategy
The review suggestions are valid and should be implemented with the following adjustments:
- Change
ForbiddenExceptiontoUnauthorizedExceptionfor authentication failures - Use
UserInfotype from@vben-core/typingsinstead ofany - Rename
findUsertouserfor better clarity
Apply this diff:
+ import { UnauthorizedException } from '@nestjs/common';
+ import { UserInfo } from '@vben-core/typings';
- import { ForbiddenException } from '@nestjs/common';
- async validate(username: string, password: string): Promise<any> {
- const findUser = await this.AuthService.validateUser(username, password);
+ async validate(username: string, password: string): Promise<UserInfo> {
+ const user = await this.authService.validateUser(username, password);
- if (!findUser) {
- throw new ForbiddenException('用户名或密码错误');
+ if (!user) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid credentials');
}
- return findUser;
+ return user;
}The changes are verified because:
- The
UserInfotype exists and matches the structure returned byvalidateUser - The mock data in
AuthServiceconfirms the return type structure UnauthorizedExceptionis more appropriate for invalid credentials as per HTTP standards- The variable rename improves code readability
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the User interface/type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface User {
$$$
}'
# Check for other similar authentication strategies
rg -l "extends PassportStrategy"
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the User type/interface in different locations and patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'type User ='
ast-grep --pattern 'class User'
# Check the validateUser return type in AuthService
ast-grep --pattern 'validateUser(username: string, password: string): $_'
# Check imports in the local.strategy.ts
rg -A 5 "^import.*User" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts
# Check if there's a user entity or model
fd -e ts user
Length of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the user type definition in the types package
cat packages/types/src/user.ts
# Check the auth service implementation to understand the return type
rg -A 10 "validateUser.*password.*" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/
# Check if UnauthorizedException is already used elsewhere in auth
rg "UnauthorizedException" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/
Length of output: 1761
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the BasicUserInfo type and MOCK_USERS structure
rg -A 10 "BasicUserInfo" --type ts
rg -A 10 "MOCK_USERS" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/index.service.ts
# Check imports in local.strategy.ts to see what's already imported
rg "^import" apps/backend-nest/src/auth/local.strategy.ts
Length of output: 3835
apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts (1)
5-6: Verify the import alias configuration.
The #/ alias is used in imports. Ensure the path alias is properly configured in the TypeScript and build configurations.
✅ Verification successful
Path alias #/ is properly configured
The #/ path alias is correctly configured in apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json with the mapping "#/*": ["./src/*"]. This configuration allows the imports in the controller file to work as expected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify path alias configuration
# Test 1: Check tsconfig.json for path alias
echo "Checking tsconfig.json for path alias configuration..."
fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig && rg -l '"#/"' $(fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig)
# Test 2: Check build configuration files
echo "Checking build configuration files..."
fd -e js vite.config && rg -l '"#/"' $(fd -e js vite.config)
Length of output: 3557
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific tsconfig for the backend-nest app and its path aliases
# Check the content of the backend-nest tsconfig files
echo "Content of apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json:"
cat apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.json
echo -e "\nContent of apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.build.json:"
cat apps/backend-nest/tsconfig.build.json
# Let's also check for any NestJS configuration files that might define path aliases
echo -e "\nChecking for nest-cli.json:"
fd nest-cli.json
echo -e "\nContent of any nest-cli.json if found:"
fd nest-cli.json -x cat {}
Length of output: 856
|
finishing touches are underway |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/index.ts (2)
3-6: Consider adding error handling for import failures.While the current implementation is functional, it might benefit from explicit error handling for import failures.
Consider wrapping the import in a try-catch or adding error boundaries:
-const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type>('./*.middleware.ts', { +const glob_result = await Promise.all( + Object.entries(import.meta.glob<Type>('./*.middleware.ts', { import: 'default', eager: true, -}); +})).catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to load middleware modules:', error); + return {}; +});
1-1: Consider strengthening type safety.While using
Typefrom@nestjs/commonprovides basic type safety, we could make it more specific to middleware.Consider using a more specific type:
-import type { Type } from '@nestjs/common'; +import type { Type } from '@nestjs/common'; +import type { NestMiddleware } from '@nestjs/common'; + +type MiddlewareType = Type<NestMiddleware>;Then update the glob import:
-const glob_result = import.meta.glob<Type>('./*.middleware.ts', { +const glob_result = import.meta.glob<MiddlewareType>('./*.middleware.ts', {apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (1)
16-20: Consider selective middleware applicationWhile applying middleware globally (
forRoutes('*')) is valid, consider if all routes truly need all middleware. You might want to apply specific middleware to specific route patterns for better performance and maintainability.Example of selective middleware application:
- consumer.apply(...middlewares).forRoutes('*'); + // Apply specific middleware to specific routes + consumer + .apply(LoggerMiddleware) + .forRoutes('*') + .apply(AuthMiddleware) + .exclude('auth/(login|register)') + .forRoutes('*');apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/logger.middleware.ts (2)
7-8: Consider improving logger configuration for better maintainability.The logger implementation could be enhanced in two ways:
- Consider using an internationalization system for the logger context instead of hardcoded Chinese characters
- Make the logger context more specific, e.g., "HttpRequestLogger" or "RequestLoggerMiddleware"
- private readonly logger = new Logger('HTTP请求'); + private readonly logger = new Logger(LoggerMiddleware.name);
22-23: Consider standardizing export pattern.The dual export pattern (both named and default) could lead to inconsistent import usage across the codebase. Consider:
- Standardizing on named exports for better tree-shaking
- Using English comments for better international collaboration
-// 默认导出，便于glob导入 -export default LoggerMiddleware; +// Remove default export and rely on named export onlyapps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.plugin.ts (2)
6-11: Add type safety to the Cookies decorator.The current implementation could benefit from improved type safety and validation:
-export const Cookies = createParamDecorator( - (data: string, ctx: ExecutionContext) => { +export const Cookies = createParamDecorator( + <T = any>(data: string | undefined, ctx: ExecutionContext): T => { const request: Express.Request = ctx.switchToHttp().getRequest(); - return data ? request.cookies?.[data] : request.cookies; + if (data) { + const cookie = request.cookies[data]; + if (cookie === undefined) { + throw new Error(`Cookie '${data}' not found`); + } + return cookie as T; + } + return request.cookies as T; }, );
13-28: Improve type declarations and documentation.Consider the following improvements:
- Translate comments to English for better international collaboration
- Use more specific types for cookie values
declare global { export namespace Express { export interface Request { /** - * 请求密钥 - * [可选] 如果向`cookie-parser`传递了密钥，则此属性将包含密钥。 - * 可以被其他中间件使用 + * Request secret key + * [Optional] If a secret was provided to `cookie-parser`, this property will contain that secret. + * Can be used by other middleware */ secret?: string | undefined; - /** 解析尚未签名的cookie */ - cookies: Record<string, any>; - /** 解析已签名的cookie */ - signedCookies: Record<string, any>; + /** Parsed unsigned cookies */ + cookies: Record<string, string | undefined>; + /** Parsed signed cookies */ + signedCookies: Record<string, string | undefined>; } } }apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts (2)
18-18: Consider using ASCII characters for logger names.Using non-ASCII characters ('HTTP响应') in logger names might cause display issues in different environments or log aggregation systems.
- private readonly logger = new Logger('HTTP响应'); + private readonly logger = new Logger('HTTP_RESPONSE');
41-42: Consider named exports and English documentation.
- The comment should be in English for better international collaboration
- Named exports are generally preferred over default exports as they:
- Support better tree-shaking
- Make refactoring easier
- Are more explicit
-// 默认导出，便于glob导入 -export default TransformInterceptor; +// Exported for glob imports in module registration +export { TransformInterceptor };docs/src/guide/essentials/server.md (4)
352-360: Add implications of disabling mock serviceWhile the configuration is clear, consider adding information about:
- What happens after disabling mock service
- How to switch to real API endpoints
- Any additional configuration needed
361-368: Enhance NodeJS server introduction sectionConsider adding:
- Version requirements for Node.js and NestJS
- Prerequisites for using the backend template
- Link to NestJS documentation for further reading
408-419: Enhance application entry configuration examplesConsider adding:
- Examples of different export scenarios (named exports vs default export)
- Sample directory structure showing the relationship between VITE_APP_PATH and entry file
- Impact of these configurations on the application
420-428: Expand server startup configuration sectionPlease enhance this section by adding:
- Use cases for immediate startup
- Implications of enabling/disabling this feature
- Relationship with other configuration options
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
apps/backend-nest/.env(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/.env.development(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/interceptor/transform.interceptor.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/logger.middleware.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.plugin.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/backend-nest/src/routes/user.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/.env.development(1 hunks)docs/src/guide/essentials/server.md(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- apps/backend-nest/.env
- apps/backend-nest/.env.development
- apps/backend-nest/src/filters/http-exception.filter.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/index.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/index.controller.ts
- apps/backend-nest/src/routes/user.controller.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/index.ts (1)
1-8: LGTM! Clean implementation of dynamic middleware imports.
The implementation provides a scalable way to manage middleware modules. The use of import.meta.glob with eager: true ensures all middleware is loaded at startup, preventing runtime surprises.
Let's verify the middleware file naming convention is followed consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Dynamic middleware setup is correctly implemented and follows best practices
The verification confirms:
- Proper naming convention is followed with
.middleware.tssuffix LoggerMiddlewareis correctly implemented as a NestJS middleware with proper decorators and interface implementation- Default export is present, matching the glob import pattern
- Type safety is maintained throughout the implementation
The dynamic import setup in index.ts correctly captures and exports the middleware, making it a clean and maintainable solution.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all middleware files follow the .middleware.ts pattern
# and verify no middleware files are missed
# Test 1: List all files in the middleware directory
echo "Files in middleware directory:"
fd . "apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares"
# Test 2: Specifically check for middleware files
echo -e "\nFiles matching middleware pattern:"
fd "middleware.ts$" "apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares"
Length of output: 405
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation of logger.middleware.ts to ensure it exports a valid NestJS middleware
cat apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/logger.middleware.ts
Length of output: 660
apps/web-antd/.env.development (1)
10-10: Verify backend readiness before disabling mock service.
The change to disable the Nitro Mock service (VITE_NITRO_MOCK=false) aligns with the introduction of the NestJS backend. However, we should ensure a smooth transition for developers.
Please verify:
- All previously mocked endpoints have corresponding implementations in the new NestJS backend
- The backend is properly configured and accessible at the specified API URL (/api)
Consider:
- Updating the development setup documentation to reflect this change
- Adding instructions for developers to set up and run the NestJS backend
- Providing a fallback option (e.g., setting VITE_NITRO_MOCK=true) during the transition period
✅ Verification successful
Disabling mock service is appropriate with NestJS backend integration
Based on the documentation and configuration analysis:
- The change from
VITE_NITRO_MOCK=truetofalsealigns perfectly with the PR's objective of introducing a NestJS backend:
- The mock service was designed as a temporary solution during frontend development
- The PR introduces a real NestJS backend with JWT auth and other features
- The documentation explicitly states that mock services should be disabled when using real backend endpoints
- The transition is well-supported:
- The proxy configuration in
vite.config.mtsis already set up to handle API requests - The NestJS backend template is provided in
apps/backend-nest - The documentation includes clear instructions for switching between mock and real backend
- No active mock dependencies were found in the codebase that would be broken by this change.
The change is safe and follows the recommended practice of disabling mocks when moving to a real backend implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential mock usage in the codebase that might be affected
# Test: Look for mock service imports or usage
rg -l "nitro.*mock" --type ts --type vue
# Test: Look for mock API endpoints that need to be implemented
rg -l "mock.*api" --type ts --type vue
Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find mock-related code
# Look for mock service imports or usage with broader file types
rg -l -t js -t ts -t jsx -t tsx "nitro.*mock"
# Look for mock API endpoints with broader file types
rg -l -t js -t ts -t jsx -t tsx "mock.*api"
# Check for any mock-related configurations
rg -l "VITE_NITRO_MOCK"
# Look for any mock-related imports or services
rg -l "createMock|useMock|mockService"
# Check package.json files for mock-related dependencies
fd "package.json" --exec grep -l "mock"
Length of output: 592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the documentation and configuration files to understand the mock setup
# Check the content of relevant documentation files
echo "=== Settings Documentation ==="
cat docs/src/guide/essentials/settings.md
echo -e "\n=== Server Documentation ==="
cat docs/src/guide/essentials/server.md
echo -e "\n=== Environment Configuration ==="
cat internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts
# Check if there's a dedicated mock backend
echo -e "\n=== Mock Backend Package ==="
cat apps/backend-mock/package.json
Length of output: 24054
apps/backend-nest/src/app/index.module.ts (3)
12-15: LGTM: Module configuration follows NestJS best practices
The module configuration is well-structured:
- Imports essential modules (RoutesModule, AuthModule)
- Globally registers guards, interceptors, and filters using spread operator
1-20: Verify error handling setup
The module imports filters but we should verify proper error handling setup across the application.
Let's check the error handling implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for error handling implementations
echo "Checking error handling setup..."
# Look for exception filters
echo "=== Exception Filters ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ExceptionFilter {
$$$
}'
# Look for error handling in interceptors
echo "=== Error Handling in Interceptors ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements NestInterceptor {
$$$
catchError($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'5-10: Verify path alias configuration
The imports use the '#/' prefix alias which is non-standard. Ensure the path alias is properly configured in your TypeScript/Node.js configuration.
Let's verify the path alias configuration:
✅ Verification successful
The previous output seems unrelated to path alias configuration. Let's specifically check for tsconfig files and package.json imports field to verify the '#/' path alias setup.
Path alias '#/' is properly configured
The '#/' path alias is correctly configured in both tsconfig.json and package.json files:
- Multiple tsconfig.json files show the path mapping:
"paths": {
"#/*": ["./src/*"]
}- Several package.json files also define the import alias:
"imports": {
"#/*": "./src/*"
}The path alias usage in the imports is valid and follows the project's configuration standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for path alias configuration in common config files
echo "Checking for path alias configuration..."
for config_file in $(fd -e json -e js '(tsconfig|package)\.json$' && fd 'vite\.config\.(ts|js)$'); do
echo "=== Checking $config_file ==="
cat "$config_file"
done
Length of output: 3879
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for tsconfig files specifically and their path mappings
echo "=== Checking tsconfig files ==="
fd -e json 'tsconfig.*\.json$' -x cat {}
# Also check for any path alias setup in package.json
echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json ==="
fd -g 'package.json' -x jq '.imports' {}
Length of output: 8886
apps/backend-nest/src/middlewares/logger.middleware.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM! Clean imports and proper decorator usage.
The imports are well-organized, using type imports appropriately, and the @Injectable() decorator is correctly applied.
apps/backend-nest/src/plugins/cookies.plugin.ts (1)
1-28: Verify cookie security settings in authentication flow.
Since this plugin is used for handling refresh tokens in the authentication flow, it's crucial to ensure proper security settings are enforced.
✅ Verification successful
Cookie security settings are properly configured for refresh tokens
The cookie-utils implementation shows that refresh tokens are stored with appropriate security settings:
httpOnly: trueprevents JavaScript accesssecure: trueensures HTTPS-only transmissionsameSite: 'none'is set for cross-origin compatibilitymaxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000sets a 24-hour expiration
The implementation follows security best practices for JWT refresh token cookies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cookie usage in auth-related files
echo "Checking cookie usage in auth controller..."
rg -A 5 "Cookies.*refresh" apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts
echo "Checking cookie settings in auth responses..."
rg -A 5 "res\.cookie.*refresh" apps/backend-nest/src/routes/
Length of output: 557
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for cookie-related settings in auth flow
echo "Checking auth controller implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class AuthController" apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts
echo "Checking cookie settings in response handlers..."
rg -A 10 "@Post.*login|@Post.*sign" apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts
echo "Checking cookie configuration in auth service..."
rg -A 5 "setCookie|cookie" apps/backend-nest/src/routes/auth.controller.ts apps/backend-nest/src/services/auth.service.ts
echo "Checking for any cookie configuration in main app setup..."
rg "cookie" apps/backend-nest/src/main.ts apps/backend-nest/src/app.module.ts
Length of output: 2122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for cookie utility implementation and imports
echo "Checking cookie utils implementation..."
fd -t f "cookie-utils" -x cat {}
echo "Checking for cookie configuration in app setup..."
fd -t f "main.ts|app.module.ts" -x cat {}
echo "Checking auth service implementation..."
fd -t f "auth.service" -x cat {}
Length of output: 4503
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (1)
139-156: Add JSDoc documentation for ServerPluginOptions propertiesWhile the types are well-defined, adding JSDoc comments for each property would improve maintainability and developer experience. This is especially important for properties like
adapter,immediate, andswcOptionswhere their purpose might not be immediately clear.Example documentation format:
interface ServerPluginOptions extends CommonPluginOptions { + /** Adapter configuration for server integration */ adapter?: RequestAdapterOption; + /** Name of the server application */ appName?: string; // Add similar documentation for other properties }internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (2)
243-256: Document configuration options.The function accepts several important configuration options that would benefit from JSDoc documentation:
swc: Controls whether to use SWC or esbuild for TypeScript compilationimmediate: Controls whether the app is initialized on boot- Other options that affect server behavior
Add JSDoc documentation like this:
/** * Load Vite plugins for server-side applications * @param options Server plugin options * @param options.swc - Use SWC instead of esbuild for TypeScript compilation * @param options.immediate - Initialize the app immediately on boot * @param options.adapter - Server framework adapter (e.g., 'nest', 'express') * @param options.appPath - Path to the server application entry point * @returns Array of Vite plugins */
268-277: Consider environment-specific compiler configuration.The
swcandtsCompileroptions are hardcoded. Consider making them environment-aware for optimal development experience.- tsCompiler: swc ? 'swc' : 'esbuild', + tsCompiler: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' || swc ? 'swc' : 'esbuild',
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
internal/vite-config/package.json(2 hunks)internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts(5 hunks)internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts(5 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- internal/vite-config/package.json
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (7)
internal/vite-config/src/typing.ts (2)
87-88: LGTM: Well-documented common option addition
The noElement optional flag is appropriately typed and documented, providing a clear way to indicate absence of frontend elements.
172-180: LGTM: Consistent type definition structure
The new server configuration types follow the established pattern and are well-integrated into the existing type system.
Let's verify the consistency of configuration usage across the codebase:
Also applies to: 190-190, 196-196
✅ Verification successful
Type definitions and usage are consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- All three configuration types (
DefineApplicationOptions,DefineLibraryOptions,DefineServerOptions) follow the same pattern with identical structure - Each type has a corresponding configuration function in its respective module that uses it correctly
- The types are properly used in the configuration functions with consistent parameter patterns and return types
- The union type
DefineConfigcorrectly includes all three configuration options
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of configuration types
# Expected: All config definitions should follow the same pattern
# Search for config definitions using these types
rg -t typescript "DefineConfig|DefineServerOptions|DefineApplicationOptions|DefineLibraryOptions" -A 2
Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the type definitions and their usage
# Search for type definitions without file type restriction
rg "type\s+(DefineConfig|DefineServerOptions|DefineApplicationOptions|DefineLibraryOptions)" -A 2
# Search for any usage of these types in function parameters or type annotations
rg "(DefineConfig|DefineServerOptions|DefineApplicationOptions|DefineLibraryOptions)(\s*[=:)])" -A 2
# Look for files that might contain these definitions
fd -e ts -e tsx -x grep -l "DefineConfig\|DefineServerOptions\|DefineApplicationOptions\|DefineLibraryOptions" {}
Length of output: 3172
pnpm-workspace.yaml (2)
166-166: LGTM: Addition of vite-plugin-node aligns with PR objectives.
The addition of vite-plugin-node at version ^4.0.0 is appropriate for supporting the server-side Vite configuration requirements of the NestJS template.
Line range hint 1-14: Verify NestJS template location compatibility.
The workspace configuration includes apps/* in the package paths, which correctly supports the new @vben/backend-nest project location.
✅ Verification successful
Backend NestJS project location verified in workspace configuration
The backend-nest project exists at the expected location apps/backend-nest/ which aligns with the workspace configuration's apps/* pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and structure of the apps directory
# Test: Check if apps directory exists and contains the backend-nest project
fd -t d "^backend-nest$" apps/
Length of output: 51
internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (3)
53-56: LGTM: Improved plugin loading optimization.
The addition of the noElement flag to conditionally load Vue-related plugins is a good optimization, especially for server-side builds where these plugins aren't needed.
257-257: Add validation for required options.
The past review comment about validating adapter and appPath is still valid. Type casting to Required<ServerPluginOptions> doesn't provide runtime safety.
283-287: Reconsider server restart strategy.
The past review comment about the performance impact of server.restart() is still valid. Consider implementing a more targeted HMR strategy.
|
@anncwb i think no test file need to do |
| '@vben/backend-nest': patch | ||
| '@vben/docs': patch | ||
| '@vben/vite-config': patch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Based on the git history, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence that these are indeed new features introduced in this PR (commit bfd9cbb: "feat: 新增nest模板、新增server类型的vite配置").
Version bumps should be minor, not patch, for these new features
The changes introduce entirely new features:
- A new NestJS template with JWT auth, core APIs, and unified response handling
- New server-type Vite configurations
According to semver conventions, new features warrant minor version bumps. Patch versions are for backwards-compatible bug fixes only.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider using minor version bumps instead of patches.
Since you're adding new features (NestJS template and server-type Vite configuration), these changes should typically warrant minor version bumps rather than patches according to semver conventions. Patch versions are usually reserved for backwards-compatible bug fixes.
-'@vben/backend-nest': patch
-'@vben/docs': patch
-'@vben/vite-config': patch
+'@vben/backend-nest': minor
+'@vben/docs': minor
+'@vben/vite-config': minorLet me gather more information about these packages to verify if they are new additions or existing ones with modifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these are truly new features by looking for existing implementations
echo "Checking for existing NestJS template..."
fd -t f "package.json" -x grep -l "backend-nest"
echo "Checking for existing server-type Vite config..."
rg -l "defineServerConfig"
Length of output: 402
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git history for these packages
echo "Checking git history for backend-nest..."
git log --diff-filter=A -- apps/backend-nest/
echo "Checking git history for vite-config server configuration..."
git log --diff-filter=A -- internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts
# Check package versions
echo "Current package versions..."
cat apps/backend-nest/package.json | grep \"version\"
cat internal/vite-config/package.json | grep \"version\"
# Check the actual changes in this PR
echo "Changes to server config..."
git diff internal/vite-config/src/config/server.ts
Length of output: 1041
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anncwb how do u think about it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
|
还没时间细看，不过其实它了现在 backend-mock 的事，一开始也是用了 nestjs 的，后面改成了轻量的nitro。想了下这样后面会越来越多，所以可后面会倾向于单开一个仓库或者分支来做。 |
但是如果放在同一个
|
Description
使用vben肯定比较注重工程化，而全栈人也常常为了工程化将前后端放在同一个monorepo中，nestjs就是个nodejs开发、适合工程化、非常常用的一个后端框架，所以我感觉nestjs完全可以配置为开箱即用
@vben/vite-config: 新增defineServerConfig及其相关类型与方法defineServerConfig: 允许使用swc编译, 并提供模板配置apps: 提供@vben/backend-nest项目基础模板@vben/backend-nest: 提供JWT验证及鉴权收尾@vben/backend-nest: 提供统一响应的过滤器及拦截器@vben/backend-nest: 提供vben所必需的核心@vben/backend-nest: 提供后端服务器常用的接口Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores