-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update server.md #5467
Update server.md #5467
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the response handling logic in the server documentation, introducing a more generalized approach to processing HTTP responses. The changes replace a specific response interceptor with a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/src/guide/essentials/server.md (3)
234-241
: Add examples of different response formats.The new
defaultResponseInterceptor
configuration is more flexible, but it would be helpful to include examples of different API response formats and how to configure the interceptor for each case.Add examples like:
// Example 1: Standard response format { code: 0, data: { ... }, message: 'success' } // Example 2: Different field names { statusCode: 200, result: { ... }, error: null } // Configuration for Example 2: defaultResponseInterceptor({ codeField: 'statusCode', dataField: 'result', successCode: 200, })
234-241
: Document error handling configuration.The interceptor configuration should include information about error handling, particularly how non-success codes are processed.
Add a note explaining:
// Note: When response[codeField] !== successCode, the interceptor will reject // the promise with the response data. This can be caught and handled by the // errorMessageResponseInterceptor shown below.
234-241
: Consider adding a dedicated section for response handling.The response interceptor configuration is a crucial part of the request client setup. Consider creating a dedicated section that explains:
- The purpose and benefits of the
defaultResponseInterceptor
- How it integrates with other interceptors in the chain
- Common customization scenarios
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/src/guide/essentials/server.md
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: post-update (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: post-update (ubuntu-latest)
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yaml
unless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:dev
command.pnpm test
.feat:
,fix:
,perf:
,docs:
, orchore:
.Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Refactor