-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Messages counters are disabled if notifications for group chats are disabled #528
Comments
I'm in two minds as to how to categorize this - it certainly seems unexpected that unread message count functionality would be coupled to notifications, so I'm leaning towards its being a bug. Related: #1359 element-hq/element-web#3389. Could be tackled as part of #1359. |
the current designed behaviour is "badge count shows number of missed notifs". I agree it could be useful though to have the count reflect messages even if you didn't get a notif for them though. This is a new feature tho. |
+1 for decoupling the two |
…ations This is a potential solution to https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues/3374 and element-hq/element-web#5953 as raised by Mozilla at element-hq/element-web#10868. This lets you define a push rule action which increases the badge count (unread notification) count on a given room, but doesn't actually send a push for that notification via email or HTTP. We might want to define this as the default behaviour for group chats in future to solve https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues/3268 at last. This is implemented as a string action rather than a tweak because: * Other pushers don't care about the tweak, given they won't ever get pushed * The DB can store the tweak more efficiently using the existing `notify` table. * It avoids breaking the default_notif/highlight_action optimisations. Clients which generate their own notifs (e.g. desktop notifs from Riot/Web would need to be aware of the new push action) to uphold it. An alternative way to do this would be to maintain a `msg_count` alongside `highlight_count` and `notification_count` in `unread_notifications` in sync responses. However, doing this by counting the rows in `events` since the `stream_position` of the user's last read receipt turns out to be painfully slow (~200ms), perhaps due to the size of the events table. So instead, we use the highly optimised existing event_push_actions (and event_push_actions_staging) table to maintain the counts - using the code paths which already exist for tracking unread notification counts efficiently. These queries are typically ~3ms or so. The biggest issues I see here are: * We're slightly repurposing the `notif` field on `event_push_actions` to track whether a given action actually sent a `push` or not. This doesn't seem unreasonable, but it's slightly naughty given that previously the field explicitly tracked whether `notify` was true for the action (and as a result, it was uselessly always set to 1 in the DB). * We're going to put more load on the `event_push_actions` table for all the random group chats which people had previously muted. In practice i don't think there are many of these though. * There isn't an MSC for this yet (although this comment could become one).
The current set-up breaks Kent Pitman's two-bit rule. |
Hello all! |
This is a spec issue, the server-side (unread) notification counters are not provided when you disable notifications (because they're notification counters after all) |
I don't need notifications for every single message in group chats. So I turned them off but counters for messages disappeared. I need to know number of unread messages per chat but I don't want to get spammed with notifications.
If desktop notifications is on and notifications for group chats is on there are counters present but I get unwanted notifications.
If desktop notifications is on and notifications for group chats is off no counters and no unwanted notifications.
I think there should be a way to see counters and receive notification only on mentioning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: