Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: start removing Atom from the hot path #2295

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2020
Merged

perf: start removing Atom from the hot path #2295

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2020

Conversation

lukesteensen
Copy link
Member

Ref #1891

This removes Atom from our data model and the grok_parser transform. We can follow up with similar changes to other components, but this was sufficient for a ~15% throughput increase in a simple grok-heavy pipeline.

I also removed some unused methods *_flat that kept catching my eye for looking slow. Let me know if we should keep these around for any reason @a-rodin.

Signed-off-by: Luke Steensen <luke.steensen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Steensen <luke.steensen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Steensen <luke.steensen@gmail.com>
@binarylogic
Copy link
Contributor

/test -t tcp_to_tcp_performance

@binarylogic binarylogic removed the request for review from bruceg April 10, 2020 22:48
@lukesteensen
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to merge with the one approval for now, but please do still review when you get a chance 😄

@lukesteensen lukesteensen merged commit b6e53d5 into master Apr 10, 2020
@lukesteensen lukesteensen deleted the no-atoms branch April 10, 2020 22:49
@github-actions
Copy link

Test harness invocation requested by #2295 (comment) is complete!

Something went wrong, see log for more details.

You can check the execution log to learn more!

Copy link
Contributor

@Hoverbear Hoverbear left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@binarylogic binarylogic added type: enhancement A value-adding code change that enhances its existing functionality. domain: performance Anything related to Vector's performance and removed type: performance labels Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
domain: performance Anything related to Vector's performance type: enhancement A value-adding code change that enhances its existing functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants