**FAIL** Overlaying path segments

[vv-monsalve]

@guidoferreyra The following check was implemented after seeing some issues for outlines with coincident paths and it is reporting a Fails status for the Geist fonts

• Geist Sans

🔥 FAIL Check there are no overlapping path segments

Some rasterizers encounter difficulties when rendering glyphs with
overlapping path segments.

A path segment is a section of a path defined by two on-curve points.
When two segments share the same coordinates, they are considered
overlapping.

Original proposal: google/fonts#7594 (comment)

• 🔥 FAIL

  The following glyphs have overlapping path segments:

* uni0416 (U+0416): L<<616.0,355.0>--<500.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0416 (U+0416): L<<428.0,355.0>--<311.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni041A (U+041A): L<<288.0,355.0>--<171.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni040C (U+040C): L<<288.0,355.0>--<171.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0496 (U+0496): L<<616.0,355.0>--<500.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0496 (U+0496): L<<428.0,355.0>--<311.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni049A (U+049A): L<<288.0,355.0>--<171.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0436 (U+0436): L<<578.0,265.0>--<467.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0436 (U+0436): L<<395.0,265.0>--<282.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni043A (U+043A): L<<272.0,265.0>--<159.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni045C (U+045C): L<<272.0,265.0>--<159.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0497 (U+0497): L<<578.0,265.0>--<467.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0497 (U+0497): L<<395.0,265.0>--<282.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni049B (U+049B): L<<272.0,265.0>--<159.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

[code: overlapping-path-segments]

• Geist Mono

🔥 FAIL Check there are no overlapping path segments

Some rasterizers encounter difficulties when rendering glyphs with
overlapping path segments.

A path segment is a section of a path defined by two on-curve points.
When two segments share the same coordinates, they are considered
overlapping.

Original proposal: google/fonts#7594 (comment)

• 🔥 FAIL

  The following glyphs have overlapping path segments:

* uni0416 (U+0416): L<<426.0,355.0>--<333.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0416 (U+0416): L<<267.0,355.0>--<174.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni041A (U+041A): L<<248.0,355.0>--<137.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni040C (U+040C): L<<248.0,355.0>--<137.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0496 (U+0496): L<<409.0,355.0>--<320.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0496 (U+0496): L<<256.0,355.0>--<167.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni049A (U+049A): L<<238.0,355.0>--<127.0,355.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0436 (U+0436): L<<432.0,265.0>--<336.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0436 (U+0436): L<<264.0,265.0>--<168.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni043A (U+043A): L<<283.0,265.0>--<170.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni045C (U+045C): L<<283.0,265.0>--<170.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0497 (U+0497): L<<432.0,265.0>--<336.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni0497 (U+0497): L<<264.0,265.0>--<168.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* uni049B (U+049B): L<<282.0,265.0>--<169.0,265.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

* asciitilde_at.liga: L<<-150.0,221.0>--<-150.0,143.0>> has the same coordinates as a previous segment.

[code: overlapping-path-segments]

[guidoferreyra]

Oh this is a new check right? It was not reporting before I will fix it now.