Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: add manual workflow for running e2e on prod #56738

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

feedthejim
Copy link
Contributor

@feedthejim feedthejim commented Oct 12, 2023

This PR adds a job to the build-and-deploy workflow so that we run e2e tests on production/vercel if the job was dispatched manually.

This is useful if you need to double-check your PR since we don't run them on production for every PRs.

@feedthejim feedthejim requested review from a team as code owners October 12, 2023 08:44
@feedthejim feedthejim requested review from leerob and delbaoliveira and removed request for a team October 12, 2023 08:44
@ijjk ijjk added the created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. label Oct 12, 2023
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Oct 12, 2023

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
buildDuration 10.1s 10.2s ⚠️ +142ms
buildDurationCached 6.1s 6.3s ⚠️ +191ms
nodeModulesSize 172 MB 172 MB
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 897ms 895ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
199-HASH.js gzip 27.5 kB 27.5 kB N/A
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip 50.9 kB 50.9 kB
99.HASH.js gzip 182 B 182 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 45.3 kB 45.3 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 254 B 252 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 32.9 kB 32.9 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.75 kB 1.75 kB N/A
Overall change 96.4 kB 96.4 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 206 B 205 B N/A
_error-HASH.js gzip 182 B 180 B N/A
amp-HASH.js gzip 506 B 505 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 322 B 323 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.57 kB 2.57 kB N/A
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 260 B 259 B N/A
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 350 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 369 B 369 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.35 kB 4.35 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 256 B 256 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.64 kB 2.63 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 312 B 311 B N/A
script-HASH.js gzip 385 B 384 B N/A
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 307 B 308 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 1.08 kB 1.08 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 485 B 482 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
index.html gzip 528 B 530 B N/A
link.html gzip 541 B 543 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 523 B 525 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 93.7 kB 93.7 kB N/A
page.js gzip 152 kB 152 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 627 B 623 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 150 B 151 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 22.9 kB 22.9 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 1.92 kB 1.92 kB
Overall change 1.92 kB 1.92 kB
Commit: f6bfd62

@feedthejim feedthejim merged commit ebebb6a into canary Oct 12, 2023
@feedthejim feedthejim deleted the feedthejim/add-manual-deploy-action branch October 12, 2023 08:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked label Nov 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. locked
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants