Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hotfix(next):next lint installs eslint@9 which includes breaking changes #64141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi commented Apr 6, 2024

This is a hotfix since it breaks next lint, I'll start to implement eslint v9 for canary.

x-ref: #64114
x-ref: eslint v9 release
Fixes #64136

@ijjk ijjk added the type: next label Apr 6, 2024
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 6, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: 25da86a

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

1 similar comment
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 6, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: 25da86a

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi marked this pull request as ready for review April 6, 2024 09:34
@huozhi huozhi added the CI approved Approve running CI for fork label Apr 6, 2024
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 6, 2024

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 6, 2024

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
buildDuration 13.9s 13.9s N/A
buildDurationCached 8.5s 6.3s N/A
nodeModulesSize 199 MB 199 MB ⚠️ +2.18 kB
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 398ms 400ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
2453-HASH.js gzip 31.4 kB 31.4 kB N/A
3304.HASH.js gzip 181 B 181 B
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip 53.7 kB 53.7 kB
8299-HASH.js gzip 5.04 kB 5.04 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 242 B 241 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 32.2 kB 32.2 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.68 kB 1.68 kB N/A
Overall change 99 kB 99 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 196 B 197 B N/A
_error-HASH.js gzip 184 B 184 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 505 B 505 B
css-HASH.js gzip 324 B 325 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.5 kB 2.5 kB N/A
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 258 B 258 B
head-HASH.js gzip 352 B 352 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 370 B 371 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.21 kB 4.21 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 259 B 259 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.67 kB 2.67 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 314 B 312 B N/A
script-HASH.js gzip 386 B 386 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 309 B 309 B
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 6.57 kB 6.57 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 481 B 484 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
index.html gzip 529 B 529 B
link.html gzip 541 B 541 B
withRouter.html gzip 523 B 524 B N/A
Overall change 1.07 kB 1.07 kB
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 95.4 kB 95.4 kB N/A
page.js gzip 3.06 kB 3.06 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 625 B 624 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 151 B 151 B
middleware.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.5 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 839 B 839 B
Overall change 990 B 990 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 170 kB 170 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 97 kB 97 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 98.8 kB 98.8 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 93 kB 93 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 144 kB 144 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 91.5 kB 91.5 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 21.4 kB 21.4 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 15.1 kB 15.1 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 15.1 kB 15.1 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 14.9 kB 14.9 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 21.1 kB 21.1 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 14.9 kB 14.9 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.55 kB 9.55 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 9.82 kB 9.82 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.55 kB 9.55 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 22.5 kB 22.5 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 23.1 kB 23.1 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 22.4 kB 22.4 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 51.1 kB 51.1 kB
Overall change 945 kB 945 kB
build cache
vercel/next.js canary devjiwonchoi/next.js eslint-9 Change
0.pack gzip 1.58 MB 1.58 MB N/A
index.pack gzip 106 kB 106 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Diff details
Diff for middleware.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: f4b6767

@devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member Author

devjiwonchoi commented Apr 6, 2024

hmm, works locally for TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test test/integration/eslint/test/next-lint.test.js

RFC: is it all good for me to start implementing v9 on create-next-app, next lint, eslint-config-next, etc.?

@darthmaim
Copy link
Contributor

RFC: is it all good for me to start implementing v9 on create-next-app, next lint, eslint-config-next, etc.?

You can check #56181 which was a PR that tried to implement support for the new flat config format.

Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi requested a review from ztanner April 6, 2024 14:34
Copy link
Member

@ztanner ztanner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the quick hotfix!

@ztanner ztanner merged commit 3b24c34 into vercel:canary Apr 6, 2024
73 checks passed
@devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for reviewing, I hope you have a great weekend!

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi deleted the eslint-9 branch April 6, 2024 14:46
@ztanner
Copy link
Member

ztanner commented Apr 6, 2024

You as well! We could probably have optimized this a bit more to exit the loop once we find eslint, but probably doesn't matter that much since the missing list is likely fairly small 😆

@devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for your insight. I totally agree that it is a much better practice. Yes, honestly, since the list is limited to lint, the length is short so didn't optimize it. I'll do better next time. Thank you again!

@KieraDOG
Copy link

Hey @devjiwonchoi , thanks for your hard work. By the way, do you have an active PR or issue that links to the implementation of ESLint v9? I'd like to have it for tracking purposes.

@devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member Author

@KieraDOG I'm not working on it since #64251 is opened already!

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
CI approved Approve running CI for fork locked type: next
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

next lint installs incompatible eslint@9
6 participants