Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ensure lint worker errors aren't silenced #75766

Merged

Conversation

ztanner
Copy link
Member

@ztanner ztanner commented Feb 6, 2025

Errors thrown by the lint worker would only surface the error if JEST_WORKER_ID is present. This check was not reliably truthy in all cases (eg, when run with the vercel CLI, JEST_WORKER_ID wasn't present) which meant the build would fail with no helpful error message. Outside of that, it was a brittle check because if jest-worker ever changed or removed this env, or we replaced the underlying worker library, this would start failing.

This updates the check to be a more explicit env variable that we control.

There's an existing test for this but unfortunately it didn't repro in the test environment.

Test plan:

  • CI=1 npx next build
  • Ensure it errors

Fixes NEXT-3994

Copy link
Member Author

ztanner commented Feb 6, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@ztanner ztanner marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 21:43
@ztanner ztanner requested a review from ijjk February 6, 2025 21:43
@@ -75,7 +76,7 @@ export class Worker {
worker._child?.on('exit', (code, signal) => {
if ((code || (signal && signal !== 'SIGINT')) && this._worker) {
logger.error(
`Static worker exited with code: ${code} and signal: ${signal}`
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drive-by rename since we use this for more than just SSG

@ztanner ztanner enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2025 21:50
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Feb 6, 2025

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
buildDuration 19.6s 17.8s N/A
buildDurationCached 16.9s 14.1s N/A
nodeModulesSize 392 MB 392 MB ⚠️ +524 B
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 471ms 463ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
5306-HASH.js gzip 54.2 kB 54.2 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.46 kB 5.46 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 52.9 kB 52.9 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 240 B 242 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.5 kB 34.5 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.59 kB 4.58 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.35 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 748 B 747 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
index.html gzip 524 B 523 B N/A
link.html gzip 539 B 538 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 520 B 520 B
Overall change 520 B 520 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 130 kB 130 kB N/A
page.js gzip 211 kB 211 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 674 B 673 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.3 kB 31.3 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 393 kB 393 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 132 kB 132 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 145 kB 145 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 141 kB 141 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 381 kB 381 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 128 kB 128 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 39.3 kB 39.3 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 40.9 kB 40.9 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 356 B 356 B
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 349 B 349 B
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.69 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.8 kB 11.8 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.68 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 31.5 kB 31.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 60.5 kB 60.5 kB
Overall change 1.67 MB 1.67 MB
build cache Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced Change
0.pack gzip 2.1 MB 2.11 MB ⚠️ +1.22 kB
index.pack gzip 74.1 kB 75.7 kB ⚠️ +1.65 kB
Overall change 2.18 MB 2.18 MB ⚠️ +2.86 kB
Diff details
Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: ee1ee78

@ztanner ztanner merged commit 8ee2d3f into canary Feb 6, 2025
132 checks passed
@ztanner ztanner deleted the 02-06-fix_ensure_lint_worker_errors_aren_t_silenced branch February 6, 2025 21:59
ztanner added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
Errors thrown by the lint worker would only surface the error if
`JEST_WORKER_ID` is present. This check was not reliably truthy in all
cases (eg, when run with the vercel CLI, `JEST_WORKER_ID` wasn't
present) which meant the build would fail with no helpful error message.
Outside of that, it was a brittle check because if jest-worker ever
changed or removed this env, or we replaced the underlying worker
library, this would start failing.

This updates the check to be a more explicit env variable that we
control.

Fixes NEXT-3994
ztanner added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
Errors thrown by the lint worker would only surface the error if
`JEST_WORKER_ID` is present. This check was not reliably truthy in all
cases (eg, when run with the vercel CLI, `JEST_WORKER_ID` wasn't
present) which meant the build would fail with no helpful error message.
Outside of that, it was a brittle check because if jest-worker ever
changed or removed this env, or we replaced the underlying worker
library, this would start failing.

This updates the check to be a more explicit env variable that we
control.

Fixes NEXT-3994
ztanner added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants