Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[error overlay] fix missing html error is not displayed #75831

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

huozhi
Copy link
Member

@huozhi huozhi commented Feb 9, 2025

What

[data-nextjs-dialog-content] was set to height: 100%, which has conflicted with useMeasureHeight hook. data-nextjs-dialog-content] 's parent is always controlled by useMeasureHeight, and the height is anmiating from 0 to the child height. If the child is aligned with that parent, then the height is always 0, which lead to not displayed

Closes NDX-797

@huozhi huozhi requested a review from devjiwonchoi February 9, 2025 13:01
@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. type: next labels Feb 9, 2025
@huozhi huozhi requested review from ztanner and gaojude February 9, 2025 13:05
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Feb 9, 2025

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
buildDuration 18.8s 15.5s N/A
buildDurationCached 14.7s 12.5s N/A
nodeModulesSize 393 MB 393 MB N/A
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 403ms 418ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
5306-HASH.js gzip 54.3 kB 54.3 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.46 kB 5.46 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 53 kB 53 kB
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 245 B 246 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.6 kB 34.5 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 53 kB 53 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.59 kB 4.58 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.35 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 748 B 747 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
index.html gzip 522 B 523 B N/A
link.html gzip 538 B 538 B
withRouter.html gzip 518 B 520 B N/A
Overall change 538 B 538 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 130 kB 130 kB N/A
page.js gzip 211 kB 211 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 676 B 670 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.3 kB 31.3 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 394 kB 394 kB N/A
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 132 kB 132 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 145 kB 145 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 141 kB 141 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 381 kB 381 kB N/A
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 129 kB 129 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 39.3 kB 39.3 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 40.9 kB 40.9 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 356 B 356 B
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 349 B 349 B
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.69 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.8 kB 11.8 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.68 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 31.5 kB 31.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 60.7 kB 60.7 kB
Overall change 897 kB 897 kB
build cache Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error Change
0.pack gzip 2.11 MB 2.11 MB ⚠️ +4.36 kB
index.pack gzip 76.6 kB 75.6 kB N/A
Overall change 2.11 MB 2.11 MB ⚠️ +4.36 kB
Diff details
Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page-exp..ntime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page.runtime.dev.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: b6af822

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Feb 9, 2025

Failing test suites

Commit: b6af822

pnpm test-dev test/e2e/socket-io/index.test.js

  • socket-io > should support socket.io without falling back to polling
Expand output

● socket-io › should support socket.io without falling back to polling

TIMED OUT: /hello world/



undefined

  735 |
  736 |   if (hardError) {
> 737 |     throw new Error('TIMED OUT: ' + regex + '\n\n' + content + '\n\n' + lastErr)
      |           ^
  738 |   }
  739 |   return false
  740 | }

  at check (lib/next-test-utils.ts:737:11)
  at Object.<anonymous> (e2e/socket-io/index.test.js:31:5)

Read more about building and testing Next.js in contributing.md.

Copy link
Contributor

@gaojude gaojude left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a test to prevent regression like this?

@huozhi
Copy link
Member Author

huozhi commented Feb 9, 2025

Should we add a test to prevent regression like this?

ideally yes but there might be too many pure styling issues could cause this issue. It's inifinite hole to assert all the styling. We do have a missing html error development test checking the DOM, the error itself rendering is covered. Mostly like not displayed visually

@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ const styles = css`
outline: none;
}

/* Place overflow: hidden on this so we can break out from [data-nextjs-dialog] */
${
'' /* Place overflow: hidden on this so we can break out from [data-nextjs-dialog] */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was this an accident?

Copy link
Member

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi Feb 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some comments from us passing to the client, I'll follow up removing them (via util function, so we can still write comments without escaping like this PR did) while minifying CSS!
x-ref: NDX-750

@devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member

Should we add a test to prevent regression like this?

I'll find a way to prevent regression, something similar to isVisible().

@huozhi huozhi merged commit 263dc23 into canary Feb 9, 2025
127 of 130 checks passed
@huozhi huozhi deleted the huozhi/02-09-fix_missing_html_error branch February 9, 2025 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants