Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN

[AntiTopQuark]

What type of PR is this?

• bug
• feature
• enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

vesoft-inc/nebula#5274

Description:

rt, Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN

How do you solve it?

Modify the style of pretty/table to produce results in the TCK format.

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

related link:

• the pr link of nebula repo: Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN nebula#5414
• the pr link of nebula-console: Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN #210
• the pr link of nebula nebula-go:Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN nebula-go#265
• the pr link of nebula-doc:Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN nebula-docs#2017
• the pr link of nebula-doc-cn:Support the tck format for the output of EXPLAIN nebula-docs-cn#2664

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[xtcyclist]

Hi. There are some build errors. Please address them.

[AntiTopQuark]

Hi. There are some build errors. Please address them.

Hello, the reason for the building failure is due to the missing function called 'MakePlanByTck' in the dependent 'nebula-go' library.
I have already implemented this function and submitted a PR: vesoft-inc/nebula-go#265
Therefore, it might be necessary to first merge the PR for the 'nebula-go' library before the current repository (nebula-console) can be successfully compiled.

[Sophie-Xie]

Hi. There are some build errors. Please address them.

Hello, the reason for the building failure is due to the missing function called 'MakePlanByTck' in the dependent 'nebula-go' library. I have already implemented this function and submitted a PR: vesoft-inc/nebula-go#265 Therefore, it might be necessary to first merge the PR for the 'nebula-go' library before the current repository (nebula-console) can be successfully compiled.

vesoft-inc/nebula-go#265 merged and nebula-console updated the dependent. But we can't rebase your pr, pls rebase it and try the CI, thanks.

[jievince]

LGTM