Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support vertex cache on storage side #1294

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 24, 2019
Merged

Conversation

dangleptr
Copy link
Contributor

Hope it could be helpful in your case. @CPWstatic

@nebula-community-bot
Copy link
Member

Unit testing passed.

@nebula-community-bot
Copy link
Member

Unit testing passed.

@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
processor->process(req); \
return f;

DEFINE_int32(vertex_cache_num, 16 * 1000 * 1000, "Total keys inside the cache");
DEFINE_int32(vertex_cache_bucket_exp, 4, "Total buckets number is 1 << cache_bucket_exp");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@nebula-community-bot
Copy link
Member

Unit testing passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@critical27 critical27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well done!

Copy link
Contributor

@bright-starry-sky bright-starry-sky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well done. Praise good work!

@nebula-community-bot
Copy link
Member

Unit testing passed.

@dangleptr dangleptr merged commit 5d18524 into vesoft-inc:master Nov 24, 2019
@dangleptr dangleptr deleted the cache branch November 24, 2019 13:49
tong-hao pushed a commit to tong-hao/nebula that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
* Support vertex cache

* Add internal check

* Address cirtical's comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants