-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove extra field. #3427
Remove extra field. #3427
Conversation
Close #3421 |
Does this PR require modification from storage clients? |
Yes. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3427 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.24% 85.34% +0.10%
==========================================
Files 1278 1278
Lines 119200 119189 -11
==========================================
+ Hits 101608 101718 +110
+ Misses 17592 17471 -121
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@@ -561,9 +561,8 @@ struct LookupAndTraverseRequest { | |||
*/ | |||
|
|||
struct ScanCursor { | |||
3: bool has_next, | |||
// next start key of scan, only valid when has_next is true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how client knows the scan has get to end?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When 'next_cursor' is null.
Close #3467 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What type of PR is this?
What does this PR do?
Which issue(s)/PR(s) this PR relates to?
Close #3421
Close #3467
Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, etc:
Additional context:
Checklist:
Release notes:
Please confirm whether to reflect in release notes and how to describe: