Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/expand into filter #3929

Merged

Conversation

Shylock-Hg
Copy link
Contributor

@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg commented Feb 23, 2022

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

Support redefined node alias in match pattern, like `match (v)-->(v)`.

@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg added doc affected PR: improvements or additions to documentation ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test labels Feb 23, 2022
@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Feb 23, 2022
@Shinji-IkariG Shinji-IkariG merged commit f08004a into vesoft-inc:master Mar 21, 2022
@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg deleted the feature/expand-into-filter branch March 21, 2022 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc affected PR: improvements or additions to documentation ready for review ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants