Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove learner parts when removing space #4040

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2022

Conversation

liwenhui-soul
Copy link
Contributor

@liwenhui-soul liwenhui-soul commented Mar 16, 2022

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

till now storage remove space by meta info, which does not contain learner, so the learner parts still exist after remove the space, this will cause core in next balance.

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@liwenhui-soul liwenhui-soul added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Mar 16, 2022
@liwenhui-soul liwenhui-soul force-pushed the part branch 2 times, most recently from 6374780 to 37c1406 Compare March 17, 2022 06:51
critical27
critical27 previously approved these changes Mar 17, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@critical27 critical27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ class NebulaStore : public KVStore, public Handler {
* @param spaceId
* @param partId
*/
void removePart(GraphSpaceID spaceId, PartitionID partId) override;
void removePart(GraphSpaceID spaceId, PartitionID partId, bool needLock = true) override;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about add some commet to explain in what condition needLock, or not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about add some commet to explain in what condition needLock, or not.

done

@liwenhui-soul liwenhui-soul changed the title remove parts by storage's info before remove space remove learner parts when removing space Mar 18, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Mar 21, 2022
void NebulaStore::removePart(GraphSpaceID spaceId, PartitionID partId) {
folly::RWSpinLock::WriteHolder wh(&lock_);
void NebulaStore::removePart(GraphSpaceID spaceId, PartitionID partId, bool needLock) {
folly::RWSpinLock::WriteHolder wh(nullptr);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why append a lock on nullptr? Is this a new way?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do nothing, you can see its code

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if so why don't remove this line?

Copy link
Contributor

@pengweisong pengweisong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment on lines +502 to +504
if (needLock) {
wh.reset(&lock_);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would you support more explanation? thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if need lock, wh will hold lock_

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants