Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

☕ Update GitHub Actions #395

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

☕ Update GitHub Actions #395

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

lambdalisue
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue commented Aug 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the GitHub Action for workflow-triggering to a more stable version, potentially improving build process reliability.
    • Upgraded the Deno setup action to a major stable version, enhancing compatibility and access to the latest features and fixes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Walkthrough

This update primarily involves changing the versions of certain GitHub Actions in workflow files. The modifications shift from specific versions to major version tags, indicating a move towards potentially more stable or compatible versions. Such changes may streamline workflows, align with new features, and ensure that the processes remain robust while avoiding breaking changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yml Updated GitHub Action from v1.2.2 to v1, indicating a shift to a more stable version.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated Deno setup action from v1.1.4 to v1, suggesting an adoption of the latest features within a stable major version.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
Actions updated, as bright as can be!
From versions past, we leap and we bound,
Stability found, in changes profound!
So here’s to the workflows, fresh and anew,
Let’s dance with the code, and enjoy the view! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.52%. Comparing base (06f471f) to head (9de1232).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #395   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.52%   95.52%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        1384     1384           
  Branches      174      174           
=======================================
  Hits         1322     1322           
  Misses         59       59           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 06f471f and 9de1232.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

20-20: LGTM! But verify the action's documentation for breaking changes.

The change to a major version tag (v1) is a good practice to ensure stability and compatibility. However, ensure that there are no breaking changes or deprecated features in benc-uk/workflow-dispatch@v1.

Verification successful

LGTM! No breaking changes found.

The change to a major version tag (v1) for benc-uk/workflow-dispatch is safe. The release notes do not indicate any breaking changes or deprecated features.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation of the GitHub Action `workflow-dispatch` for any breaking changes or deprecated features.

# Test: Open the documentation URL. Expect: Review the changelog or release notes for `v1`.
xdg-open "https://github.com/benc-uk/workflow-dispatch"

Length of output: 131


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Fetch the README or release notes of the GitHub Action `workflow-dispatch` to verify for any breaking changes or deprecated features.

# Fetch the README file from the GitHub repository
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/benc-uk/workflow-dispatch/main/README.md

# Fetch the release notes from the GitHub repository
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/benc-uk/workflow-dispatch/releases

Length of output: 6542

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit e40aec3 into main Aug 3, 2024
9 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the fix-ci branch August 3, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant