Skip to content

Conversation

hcs42
Copy link
Member

@hcs42 hcs42 commented Jul 25, 2014

vim-erlang-tags.erl generates extra tags (#rec for records), and when C-] is
hit on a record, the # is counted as part of the name, so only records tags
will be considered. If there are several records with the same name, it is
still not guaranteed that C-] will jump to the correct one.

Same was implemented for macros and '?'.

vim-erlang-tags.erl generates extra tags (#rec for records), and when C-] is
hit on a record, the # is counted as part of the name, so only records tags
will be considered. If there are several records with the same name, it is
still not guaranteed that C-] will jump to the correct one.

Same was implemented for macros and '?'.
hcs42 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2014
(#14) Jump to record/marco after '#' or '?'
@hcs42 hcs42 merged commit e9f568c into master Jul 25, 2014
@hcs42 hcs42 deleted the records branch September 5, 2014 11:33
ches added a commit to ches/vim-erlang-tags that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2015
Generalizes the approach so that the function doesn't need logic to
handle split, preview, etc. Also no longer results in the cursor being
moved to beginning of the function call (or record/macro after vim-erlang#15) in
the original buffer.
@ches ches mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2015
ches added a commit to ches/vim-erlang-tags that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2015
Generalizes the approach so that the function doesn't need logic to
handle split, preview, etc. Also no longer results in the cursor being
moved to beginning of the function call (or record/macro after vim-erlang#15) in
the original buffer.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant