Skip to content

Implement #{ ... } syntax #110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2019
Merged

Implement #{ ... } syntax #110

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2019

Conversation

tyru
Copy link
Member

@tyru tyru commented Jul 18, 2019

Fix #103

k-takata
k-takata reviewed Jul 18, 2019
View reviewed changes
mattn
mattn reviewed Jul 18, 2019
View reviewed changes
@tyru
Copy link
Member Author

tyru commented Jul 18, 2019

@k-takata @mattn
fixed!

@tyru tyru merged commit 9b485cd into master Jul 18, 2019
@tyru tyru deleted the new-dict-syntax branch July 18, 2019 15:30
blueyed
blueyed reviewed Jul 19, 2019
View reviewed changes
@blueyed blueyed mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2019
Merged
3 tasks
@tyru tyru mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2019
Merged
@blueyed blueyed mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@blueyed blueyed blueyed left review comments

@mattn mattn mattn left review comments

@k-takata k-takata k-takata left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot parse new dictionary literal #{ ... }
4 participants
@tyru @blueyed @mattn @k-takata