Fix purity classification of composite literals #768
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ArquintL
requested changes
May 21, 2024
src/main/scala/viper/gobra/frontend/info/implementation/typing/ghost/GhostExprTyping.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, the type system of Gobra disallows array literals like
[3]int{}from occurring in strongly pure contexts, even though an array is a value type (similarly to structs). Furthermore, the type system (wrongly) allows slice and map literals in pure contexts, even though it shouldn't because slices and maps are reference types. This PR addresses this classification.To implement this, I had to fix the function
underlyingTypeWithCtxPto allow for ADTs