Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add parsing support to checksum calcs #13173

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Ayman161803
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds support to statements of type CHECKSUM TABLE table1name, table2name....

Related Issue(s)

#13090
#8604

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Signed-off-by: Ayman161803 <mohammedaymannawaz@gmail.com>
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 27, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 27, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.0 milestone May 27, 2023
Ayman161803 and others added 3 commits May 27, 2023 14:58
Signed-off-by: Ayman <76606666+Ayman161803@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayman <76606666+Ayman161803@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayman161803 <mohammedaymannawaz@gmail.com>
{
$$ = &ChecksumExpr{Tables: $3}
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we move this into its own checksum_statement expression? It also doesn't seem to support the full syntax, see https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/checksum-table.html.

There's the QUICK or EXTENDED options at the end that we don't seem to parse here?

@frouioui frouioui modified the milestones: v17.0.0, v18.0.0 Jun 12, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:

  • Push additional commits to the associated branch.
  • Remove the stale label.
  • Add a comment indicating why it is not stale.

If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. label Jul 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was closed because it has been stale for 7 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jul 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants