Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reduce NOWAIT usage to tables with unique keys for foreign key plans #14772

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal commented Dec 13, 2023

Description

This PR limits the usage of NOWAIT to tables having unique key columns.
NOWAIT leads to an error when acquiring the required index lock and it cannot be granted immediately. This leads to the failure of DML execution for foreign key cases.
This is only required when the table has unique keys. When a table has unique keys MySQL does not take gap locks resulting in the issue described in #14532

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Dec 13, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.0 milestone Dec 13, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Query Serving and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Dec 13, 2023
@arthurschreiber
Copy link
Contributor

@harshit-gangal Would you mind extending the PR description to explain why we want to use NOWAIT only on a subset of foreign key plans? Just curious what this change actually means.

@harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member Author

@harshit-gangal Would you mind extending the PR description to explain why we want to use NOWAIT only on a subset of foreign key plans? Just curious what this change actually means.

updated the description.

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Member

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you run the foreign key fuzzer for a longer duration locally to make sure this doesn't cause any correctness issues?

@harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member Author

Have you run the foreign key fuzzer for a longer duration locally to make sure this doesn't cause any correctness issues?

Yes I did :)

@frouioui frouioui merged commit c4b275c into vitessio:main Dec 20, 2023
116 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the fk-nowait branch December 20, 2023 08:11
ejortegau pushed a commit to slackhq/vitess that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
…itessio#14772)

Signed-off-by: Eduardo J. Ortega U. <5791035+ejortegau@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Query Serving Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants